Regular price: $29.22

Free with 30-day trial
Membership details Membership details
  • A 30-day trial plus your first audiobook, free
  • 1 credit/month after trial – good for any book, any price
  • Easy exchanges – swap any book you don’t love
  • Keep your audiobooks, even if you cancel
  • After your trial, Audible is just $14.95/month
OR
In Cart

Publisher's Summary

Early on the morning of February 17, 1970, in Fort Bragg, North Carolina, a Green Beret doctor named Jeffrey MacDonald called the police for help. When the officers arrived at his home they found the bloody and battered bodies of MacDonald's pregnant wife and two young daughters. The word "pig" was written in blood on the headboard in the master bedroom. As MacDonald was being loaded into the ambulance, he accused a band of drug-crazed hippies of the crime.

So began one of the most notorious and mysterious murder cases of the 20th century. Jeffrey MacDonald was finally convicted in 1979 and remains in prison today. Since then a number of best-selling books - including Joe McGinniss's Fatal Vision and Janet Malcolm's The Journalist and the Murderer, along with a blockbuster television miniseries - have attempted to solve the MacDonald case and explain what it all means.

In A Wilderness of Error, Errol Morris, who has been investigating the case for nearly two decades, reveals that almost everything we know about that case is ultimately flawed, and an innocent man may be behind bars. In a masterful reinvention of the true-crime thriller, Morris looks behind the haze of myth that still surrounds these murders. Drawing on court transcripts, lab reports, and original interviews, Morris brings a complete 40-year history back to life and demonstrates how our often desperate attempts to understand and explain an ambiguous reality can overwhelm the facts.

A Wilderness of Error allows the listener to explore the case as a detective might, by confronting the evidence as if for the first time. Along the way Morris poses bracing questions about the nature of proof, criminal justice, and the media, and argues that MacDonald has been condemned not only to prison, but also to the stories that have been created around him. In this profoundly original meditation on truth and justice, Errol Morris reopens a famous closed case and reveals that, 40 years after the murder of MacDonald's family, we still have no proof of his guilt.

©2012 Errol Morris (P)2012 Tantor

Critic Reviews

"Bound to be in demand." (Library Journal)

What members say

Average Customer Ratings

Overall

  • 3.9 out of 5.0
  • 5 Stars
    64
  • 4 Stars
    38
  • 3 Stars
    19
  • 2 Stars
    9
  • 1 Stars
    15

Performance

  • 4.0 out of 5.0
  • 5 Stars
    55
  • 4 Stars
    34
  • 3 Stars
    18
  • 2 Stars
    9
  • 1 Stars
    6

Story

  • 3.9 out of 5.0
  • 5 Stars
    57
  • 4 Stars
    29
  • 3 Stars
    22
  • 2 Stars
    10
  • 1 Stars
    10
Sort by:
  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Errol writes like he directs.

Methodical and fair. I still don't know who killed the family. But I know the trial was a farce. Word.

2 of 2 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story
  • Carmen
  • Burlington, NC, United States
  • 11-05-12

Rocked My World

Any additional comments?

I was always convinced Macdonald was guilty. 100%, no question. The first half of the book didn't impress me. It seemed as if if Morris was just content to spout philosophy. He brings the jackhammer down in the second half and I'm still astonished at the lack of info regarding the Macdonald case I had no idea existed. I doubt Macdonalds guilt but, even if I didn't, the things that occurred during his trials frighten me in the sense that this judicial malfeasance could actually occur in my lifetime.

4 of 5 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Can't get my 2 hour back.

What disappointed you about A Wilderness of Error?

The author writing is very fragmented. To me it does not feel like a book. There is no build up to the setting or character development. It goes from 3rd person account to 1st person account. One sentence it is author telling a story, another sentence, he is telling it from the main character point of view. I tried so hard to listen, but after 2 hours, I just gave up. Author have some kind of fascination with the Poet Edgar Allan Poe. he keeps quoting it like every 5 minutes. I gave story 3 star, even though, I did not finish it. My head was spinning. One of his quotes was like what if you have got everything wrong. what if the accused did not kill anyone, what if it not up but it is down. it is not in, but it is out. Bottom line, there is no flow in the story.

Would you ever listen to anything by Errol Morris again?

Never.

What three words best describe John Pruden’s performance?

I can listen to him tell story by another author.

1 of 1 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Good analysis, but maybe a little far fetched

Errol Morris should have made this a documentary. He admits that he tried, but was turned down. After listening to this, i believe i can see why. Although he did his homework, a lot of the book is rehashing Fatal Vision, and explaining the 'double cross' that was perpetrated by the author. Rightfully so. But in the end, i have a hard time believing his theory based on the credibility of the 'witnesses'. Sadly, i do think this case was botched by the military police, but i do believe the conclusion would inevitably be the same. Regardless, it is still worth the credit.

3 of 4 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Well Done

Would you recommend this audiobook to a friend? If so, why?

If you're interested in the Jeffrey McDonald saga (the green beret emergency room doctor convicted of killing his wife and 2 young daughters in February 1970 (now in prison for >30 years), you'll enjoy this book. It's an encyclopedic, microscopic analysis of virtually every whisper and murmur that relates to the case. Every piece of evidence and many pieces that were never made available during the trial are treated with maximum scrutiny - truly no rock left unturned. It's well written. His research is exhaustive. Ultimately, you will have to decide for yourself if you think McD is guilty but Morris will be happy to prejudice you.

What did you like best about this story?

It's thorough

Have you listened to any of John Pruden’s other performances before? How does this one compare?

No

Was there a moment in the book that particularly moved you?

Many

3 of 4 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Captivating

This book is incredible. The story is so complicated and twisted yet Morris pulls it altogether so that facts and timelines never get confused. True TRUE drama. This audio book version is great as well, the voices are clear and uncomplicated but gripping. Very happy to have made this purchase!

2 of 3 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

If you've read Fatal Vision by Joe McGinnis you need to read this book!

This book reveals a lot of things Joe McGinnis' book and the corresponding movie did not. I don't know if it proves MacDonald's innocence, but I will say it's evident he did not get a fair trial.

2 of 3 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Interesting but Unconvincing

Would you try another book from Errol Morris and/or John Pruden?

Probably not Errol Morris. I purchased this audiobook thinking it was about another case, so I was totally unbiased going in. I had never read Fatal Vision (although I ended up reading it after I finished this audiobook). So after just being exposed to the evidence in this book, I thought Mc Donald was guilty. Errol Morris' approach to the evidence seemed naive and unsophisticated to me. I was disappointed...

Has A Wilderness of Error turned you off from other books in this genre?

No.

What does John Pruden bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?

He did a good job narrating - particularly handled the female voices well.

If this book were a movie would you go see it?

definitely not.

2 of 3 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Well written and narrated

Would you listen to A Wilderness of Error again? Why?

Yes, it was written well and I feel that on a second listen I'll pick up even more.

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Very enlightening

This is a very enlightening case study of the state of the judicial system in the United States and effect of the media there on.

1 of 2 people found this review helpful