
The Bad Food Bible
How and Why to Eat Sinfully
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Obtén 3 meses por US$0.99 al mes

Compra ahora por $20.00
-
Narrado por:
-
Jeff Cummings
-
Kate Rudd
Physician and popular New York Times Upshot contributor Aaron Carroll mines the latest evidence to show that many "bad" ingredients actually aren't unhealthy, and in some cases are essential to our well-being.
Advice about food can be confusing. There's usually only one thing experts can agree on: some ingredients - often the most enjoyable ones - are bad for you, full stop. But as Aaron Carroll explains, these oversimplifications are both wrong and dangerous: if we stop consuming some of our most demonized ingredients altogether, it may actually hurt us. In The Bad Food Bible, Carroll examines the scientific evidence, showing among other things that you can:
- Eat red meat several times a week: The health effects are negligible for most people, and actually positive if you're 65 or older.
- Have a drink or two a day: As long as it's in moderation, it will protect you against cardiovascular disease without much risk.
- Enjoy a gluten-loaded bagel from time to time: It has less fat and sugar, fewer calories, and more fiber than a gluten-free one.
- Eat more salt: If your blood pressure is normal, you should be more worried about getting too little sodium than having too much.
Full of counterintuitive lessons about food we hate to love, The Bad Food Bible is for anyone who wants to forge eating habits that are sensible, sustainable, and occasionally indulgent.
©2017 Aaron Carroll (P)2017 Brilliance Publishing, Inc., all rights reserved. Foreword © 2017 by Nina TeicholzListeners also enjoyed...




















Good Info
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
classic Dr Carroll more in book form !!!
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
thank you!
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
A gastrophile,s nightmare....
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Excellent and informative
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
To sum it up in a single word, this book was “refreshing”! An honest accounting of the data, or its lack, on numerous topics of particular attention in the popular press on nutrition. Areas where they have consistently gotten things wrong. Coupled with “common sense” strategies for eating. (Common sense is in quotes because this is common sense if you understand how digestion works, but is by no means the conventional wisdom if your nutritional knowledge is based largely on diet books or popular press headlines).
An excellent read, and I found myself nodding along almost the entire time. If anyone were to ask me what one book they should read about nutrition, it used to be the excellent “Big Fat Surprise”, but now I’d recommend this one first.
Excellent and fair minded
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
I wish he added one more chapter, to go right after debunking salt-is-bad-and-we-all-eat-too-much: WATER. I'm seriously out of patience for the ignorance on this subject. (Just the other day on a webinar given by Vitality, a person who had lost a bunch of weight advocated that everyone should drink 10 glasses of water a day. I was a little shocked that that statement wasn't addressed at all by the announcer - maybe he was caught off guard. But he's a health educator. No excuses.)
The only thing in the book that gave me pause: he misdefined BMI, apparently forgetting that "I" stands for "index" - a statistical way to measure a population, not an individual - and seemingly misattributed it to health rather than insurance. But this could have simply been due to not wanting to go off on that particular tangent in his citation of a particular study. Or maybe it's a footnote in the written text. Or maybe the editor cut it. Whatever. Truly I believe he understands that it's pretty much garbage, because the integrity of Dr. Carroll's message is there in everything else.
I love the smell of evidence in the morning
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Excellent
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
thank you for promoting sensible thinking!
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
I cannot help but wonder how he would have approached this differently, however, in our post-COVID landscape where anti-science sentiment is much more rife and vigorous.
As such, while it’s “refreshing” to hear him lecture on what makes good studies good and bad ones bad, I suspect that’s because it’s a bit nostalgic. Ten years ago, science defenders could have faith that the weight of their logic and good faith arguments would deflect the worst of the conspiracy theorists and science deniers — these days it feels a little naive to think he wouldn’t be shouted down and roundly vilified.
Some chapters are stronger than others. Carroll definitely has an “agenda”, but only in the sense that he has clearly decided he wanted the book to be about teaching moderation and permissiveness, and dispelling unfounded fear. Because of that, a few points here and there are leaned into or glossed over a bit more than he probably should have.
That said, lots and lots of great info and perspective. I do recommend it, if you’re not one of those that has learned recently to distrust science simply because it’s science.
Excellent, even-handed, and enlightening perspectives on nutrition — IF you trust science
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.