Regular price: $20.97

Free with 30-day trial
Membership details Membership details
  • A 30-day trial plus your first audiobook, free
  • 1 credit/month after trial – good for any book, any price
  • Easy exchanges – swap any book you don’t love
  • Keep your audiobooks, even if you cancel
  • After your trial, Audible is just $14.95/month
OR
In Cart

Publisher's Summary

As the blockbuster best-seller Freakonomics demonstrated, economics can explain everything - from why people behave the way they do to how governments and businesses organize themselves. But are the basic assumptions and conclusions in Freakonomics true? Does the free market usually lead to unintended and negative consequences? Quite the opposite, says John Lott, who holds a Ph.D. in economics. In fact, says Lott, a wide range of fascinating and peculiar case studies prove the simple adage that if something is more costly, people will do less of it. And, in a refutation of Freakonomics' most controversial idea, Lott shows why legalized abortion leads to family breakdown, which leads to more crime.
©2007 John R. Lott, Jr, Ph.D; (P)2007 Blackstone Audio Inc.

What members say

Average Customer Ratings

Overall

  • 3.6 out of 5.0
  • 5 Stars
    84
  • 4 Stars
    72
  • 3 Stars
    62
  • 2 Stars
    25
  • 1 Stars
    27

Performance

  • 3.6 out of 5.0
  • 5 Stars
    29
  • 4 Stars
    22
  • 3 Stars
    20
  • 2 Stars
    11
  • 1 Stars
    7

Story

  • 3.4 out of 5.0
  • 5 Stars
    29
  • 4 Stars
    18
  • 3 Stars
    14
  • 2 Stars
    11
  • 1 Stars
    16
Sort by:
  • Overall
  • Gerald
  • Helena, MT, USA
  • 05-05-08

Repetitive conservative arguments

I enjoyed Freakanomics because they showed the details (correctly or incorrectly) of how they came to their conclusion. After listening to this book, I do question some of their findings.

Unfortunately this author did not go into as much detail. I found myself constantly asking the author, "How do you know that is true?" Because of the lack of details and the author's conservative (no surprise by the title) views, I got the feeling this was more of a political book than economic book.

Because of this, as the book went on, after giving an introduction to a problem, it was easy to guess which one the author would argue for. Even if it seemed to contradict what the author said earlier. As another reviewer said, this made the book seem repetitive in the end.

It was a decent listen, just not great.

26 of 36 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • James
  • Beverly Hills, CA, United States
  • 08-28-07

Good start, low stamina

I really enjoyed the first half of this book, but found the last few hours a little repetitive.

Would suggest that it is worth listening to, but if you believe in the power of an unrestricted market, then you would have already accepted the major concept in this book.

12 of 17 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Brilliant book

Gets you thinking. Loved it. I still love freakinomics, but this book teaches to question every theory ppl put out there.

1 of 1 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Huge mistake

Any additional comments?

This book was a total mistake. I thought I'd get another perspective, but it's right-wing circle logic that just doesn't hold up. Stay away.

12 of 18 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Good text, mediocre presentation.

The book was interesting, but the reading of the book left little differentiation between the author's comments and the numerous quotes and references the book relies on. A second reader to assist with these duties might have made the audiobook easier to follow.
Also the reading was marred by strange inflections which seemed to suggest that many sentences in the text ended with a comma,


4 of 8 people found this review helpful

  • Overall

Lott versus Levitt

Most of this book is a rejoinder to Freakonomics; in that, it is probably a success. It's rather hard to tell if Lott is motivated by animus for the material in Levitt's volume on Lott, rather than the desire to illuminate the topic; however, the result is another interesting volume on economics and how they apply to the masses. I suggest it as a libertarian companion to the socialist Freakonomics.

7 of 15 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Rich white man drivel

What would have made Freedomnomics better?

If he didn't try to use statistics to make racist claims about crime and abortion, elections etc

What was most disappointing about John R. Lott’s story?

Trying to make money of someone else's best selling book freakonomics.

How could the performance have been better?

Less bias

You didn’t love this book... but did it have any redeeming qualities?

If you are a republican you will most likely enjoy this book.

2 of 5 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story
  • Brandon
  • Lincoln, NE, United States
  • 05-02-12

I'm a big free market guy but good lord

This book wasn’t for you, but who do you think might enjoy it more?

It gives a pretty good explination of free market principles if someone doesn't have a great grasp of them.

What could John R. Lott have done to make this a more enjoyable book for you?

It is so dry an unengaging when compared with Freakonomics or any of Malcom Gladwell's books

Which character – as performed by Brian Emerson – was your favorite?

its non fiction, there are no characters, this question is ridiculous

What character would you cut from Freedomnomics?

....and it goes on

Any additional comments?

Just read Milton Freidman or BOTH Adam Smith books and Atlas Shrugged and you've got it.

2 of 6 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Full of flaws!

This guy made some many wrong assumptions just to oppose freakonomics. If you want to get angry listening to obviously bias and bad arguments, this book is for you!

0 of 1 people found this review helpful

Sort by:
  • Overall
  • J
  • 09-19-12

Freedomnomics: Why the Free Market Works and Freak

What a right wing / tea party piece of rubbish!



This book is the worst book i've download!

7 of 7 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Karl
  • 08-28-11

Poor

Not a good listen and not that good a position economically. Not something I would recommend at all

8 of 10 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Story
  • Phill upNorth
  • 01-22-16

nonsense

self contradictory, syllogistic, misogynistic, short sighted nonsense.
always worth reading political views against your own but when a erudite five year old can demolish the arguments you know it's a poor narrative.

1 of 1 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story
  • Ger
  • 10-12-14

Unbelievable

What could have made this a 4 or 5-star listening experience for you?

The content is not credible. Essentially it is mainly a counter argument to Freakonomics.

Would you ever listen to anything by John R. Lott again?

No

How did the narrator detract from the book?

Not the issue

What character would you cut from Freedomnomics?

Not the issue

Any additional comments?

If you believe this then you would believe that the greedy people and corporations of this world are all working with the best of intentions and full justified.

1 of 1 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story
  • DaveW
  • 04-05-15

I enjoyed it

I actually meant to buy 'Freakonomics' but didn't have my glasses when I ordered this. This is largely a polemic of Freakonomics and my first thought is that it has saved me the hassle of actually reading it.
A lot of this is looks at what Freakonomics says and then explores the topic in more depth, usually with the result that its authors were a couple of 'chancers' (my words, meant affectionately) that reliably only presented a choice selection of facts.

I particularly like the range of subjects discussed. I had no idea, for example, of how the Swedish government went about indoctrination in its schools.

There was clearly lots of background reading and interesting quotes, suggesting that the author was very credible.

1 of 2 people found this review helpful