Regular price: $31.93

Membership details Membership details
  • A 30-day trial plus your first audiobook, free.
  • 1 credit/month after trial – good for any book, any price.
  • Easy exchanges – swap any book you don’t love.
  • Keep your audiobooks, even if you cancel.
  • After your trial, Audible is just $14.95/month.
OR
In Cart

Publisher's Summary

A riveting true crime story that vividly recounts the birth of modern forensics.

At the end of the 19th century, serial murderer Joseph Vacher, known and feared as “The Killer of Little Shepherds”, terrorized the French countryside. He eluded authorities for years - until he ran up against prosecutor Emile Fourquet and Dr. Alexandre Lacassagne, the era’s most renowned criminologist. The two men - intelligent and bold - typified the Belle Époque, a period of immense scientific achievement and fascination with science’s promise to reveal the secrets of the human condition.

With high drama and stunning detail, Douglas Starr revisits Vacher’s infamous crime wave, interweaving the story of how Lacassagne and his colleagues were developing forensic science as we know it. We see one of the earliest uses of criminal profiling, as Fourquet painstakingly collects eyewitness accounts and constructs a map of Vacher’s crimes. We follow the tense and exciting events leading to the murderer’s arrest. And we witness the twists and turns of the trial, celebrated in its day. In an attempt to disprove Vacher’s defense by reason of insanity, Fourquet recruits Lacassagne, who in the previous decades had revolutionized criminal science by refining the use of blood-spatter evidence, systematizing the autopsy, and doing groundbreaking research in psychology. Lacassagne’s efforts lead to a gripping courtroom denouement.

The Killer of Little Shepherds is an important contribution to the history of criminal justice, impressively researched and thrillingly told.

©2010 Douglas Starr (P)2010 Random House Audio

Critic Reviews

“Eloquent.... Starr creates tension worthy of a thriller.” ( Publishers Weekly)
“Starr’s heavy immersion into forensics and investigative procedure makes interesting reading.... [A] well-documented mix of forensic science, narrative nonfiction, and criminal psychology.” ( Kirkus)

What members say

Average Customer Ratings

Overall

  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    123
  • 4 Stars
    110
  • 3 Stars
    65
  • 2 Stars
    16
  • 1 Stars
    9

Performance

  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    99
  • 4 Stars
    87
  • 3 Stars
    42
  • 2 Stars
    8
  • 1 Stars
    5

Story

  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    104
  • 4 Stars
    71
  • 3 Stars
    44
  • 2 Stars
    18
  • 1 Stars
    3
Sort by:
  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Masterly introduction to modern forensic science

In this book, Starr expertly weaves the story of turn-of-the-century serial killer Joseph Vacher, with the early heroes of forensic science. The book is simply fascinating, both the tales of Vacher's crimes and the hunt for him, and the various people developing methods in forensics (like how to perform an autopsy, determine a person's height from a few bones, or finding out how long ago a person died). The book is well paced, and the performance of the narrator, Erik Davies, is wonderful.

I truly have nothing negative to say about it - it's great.

9 of 9 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Truly the best true crime/forensic science

This is my pick for my audible book of the year. Mesmerizing. A perfect listen.

6 of 6 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    4 out of 5 stars

Impressively Researched and Thrillingly Told

A riveting true crime story that vividly recounts the birth of modern forensics.

At the end of the nineteenth century, serial murderer Joseph Vacher, known and feared as “The Killer of Little Shepherds,” terrorized the French countryside. He eluded authorities for years—until he ran up against prosecutor Emile Fourquet and Dr. Alexandre Lacassagne, the era’s most renowned criminologist. The two men—intelligent and bold—typified the Belle Époque, a period of immense scientific achievement and fascination with science’s promise to reveal the secrets of the human condition.

With high drama and stunning detail, Douglas Starr revisits Vacher’s infamous crime wave, interweaving the story of how Lacassagne and his colleagues were developing forensic science as we know it. We see one of the earliest uses of criminal profiling, as Fourquet painstakingly collects eyewitness accounts and constructs a map of Vacher’s crimes. We follow the tense and exciting events leading to the murderer’s arrest. And we witness the twists and turns of the trial, celebrated in its day. In an attempt to disprove Vacher’s defense by reason of insanity, Fourquet recruits Lacassagne, who in the previous decades had revolutionized criminal science by refining the use of blood-spatter evidence, systematizing the autopsy, and doing groundbreaking research in psychology. Lacassagne’s efforts lead to a gripping courtroom denouement.

The Killer of Little Shepherds is an important contribution to the history of criminal justice, impressively researched and thrillingly told.

4 of 5 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    3 out of 5 stars

hard to get into

couldn't get interested into the story it dragged out to me. I'm going to try and listen later but. it wasn't my favorite.

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Fascinating and well read!

If you are interested in the history of forensic science and crime this is the book for you.

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Master Story Teller

Would you consider the audio edition of The Killer of Little Shepherds to be better than the print version?

Did not read print

What did you like best about this story?

The valuable information he was able to convey.

Which character – as performed by Erik Davies – was your favorite?

My favorite character in the book was the man who defended his wife from the attack of the serial killer, and bought the criminal to justice.

Was this a book you wanted to listen to all in one sitting?

Yes.

Any additional comments?

A great book filled with valuable history and information.

  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    4 out of 5 stars

Informative and interesting

Would you listen to The Killer of Little Shepherds again? Why?

Yes. The science is fascinating. A lot to learn and review.

Who was your favorite character and why?

Not applicable.

Which scene was your favorite?

I especially like the explanations about why certain approaches proved effective but others not.

Was this a book you wanted to listen to all in one sitting?

No. Several sittings.

Any additional comments?

This was a good "listen."

  • Overall
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    3 out of 5 stars

Interesting! … Albeit Gruesome

I didn’t like this book all that much and I can’t quite pin down why; it wasn’t bad really. I think what annoyed me was the feeling that I was reading two separate books at the same time, and I didn’t like the way the narrative flopped around. Just my feeling, others may disagree.

There is the very interesting information about the “Birth of Forensic Science” which incidentally seems almost preposterous to me! By that I mean it’s amazing that it was only in the 1800s that they developed certain medical techniques and observations… but then again, I have to remember that before this point in time, medicine - let alone forensics - was still akin to witchcraft or sorcery for most people!!!

Then there is the grizzly story of a serial killer (The Killer of Little Shepherds) that happens to take place in the same time frame. I get that they wanted to tie one in with the other in a way that weaves the information together, but the way it was set up just made it seem like I was reading a bunch of tangents.

I think I would have preferred the complete evolution of forensics first, and then read about the killer’s escapades afterwards. Not a bad book, it’s probably really good if you are a real-crime nut, but I just didn’t warm up to it overall.

2 of 4 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    3 out of 5 stars

Great reading!

Would you recommend this audiobook to a friend? If so, why?

Sure, I have forensic friends , I have recommended this book to them

What was the most interesting aspect of this story? The least interesting?

Mr Lacassagne way of thinking is a very interesting aspect of the story, he's very Smart and simple at the same time. I cannot remember anything non-interesting

What about Erik Davies’s performance did you like?

Not really too much, sometimes his voice is very relaxing

Did you have an extreme reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry?

not really, but it made me think on the early forensic science and thinking on that time

Any additional comments?

The book talks on the Dreyfuss affair but it never deepens on it, I would like to have that extra background in the early chapters

  • Overall
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    2 out of 5 stars

If you are interested.

What would have made The Killer of Little Shepherds better?

You have to be very interested in the concepts of Forensic Science and want to understand where it comes from and the forerunners of this way of looking at criminals and their behavior. I am glad to know the names of the individuals who began this field and why.

Would you ever listen to anything by Douglas Starr again?

Yes

How could the performance have been better?

Not quite so dry.

What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?

I would like to see one of the CSI shows mention it's beginnings which are set out in this story.

Any additional comments?

I liked the book, but I am very interested in the history of the forensic science utilized in criminology.