Reversible Errors

De: Scott Turow

Narrado por: J. R. Horne

Rommy "Squirrel" Gandolph is a Yellow Man, an inmate on death row for a 1991 triple murder in Kindle County. His slow progress toward certain execution is nearing completion when Arthur Raven, a corporate lawyer who is Rommy's reluctant court-appointed representative, receives word that another inmate may have new evidence that will exonerate Gandolph.

Arthur's opponent in the case is Muriel Wynn, Kindle County's formidable chief deputy prosecuting attorney, who is considering a run for her boss's job. Muriel and Larry Starczek, the original detective on the case, don't want to see Rommy escape a fate they long ago determined he deserved, for a host of reasons. Further complicating the situation is the fact that Gillian Sullivan, the judge who originally found Rommy guilty, is only recently out of prison herself, having served time for taking bribes.

Scott Turow's compelling, multi-dimensional characters take the reader into Kindle County's parallel yet intersecting worlds of police and small-time crooks, airline executives and sophisticated scammers--and lawyers of all stripes. No other writer offers such a convincing true-to-life picture of how the law and life interact, or such a profound understanding of what is at stake--personally, professionally, and morally--when the state holds the power to end a man's life.

Great story by a human writer.

I was going to say “flawed” writer, but we all are flawed and that’s one of the themes he explores brilliantly in this book. It’s just such a disappointment to pick up on some of his tendency towards racism and other biases that I thought I’d bring it up. It won’t bother everyone and the book is worth it. Excellent character development, intriguing plot, great unraveling of mystery, very entertaining. Also thought provoking about deep human issues. Almost a five - I’m curious now to listen to something he’s written in more recent years.

Just...okay

In my opinion these stories have too many characters and sometimes it's hard to remember who's who. Narrator was fine, sometimes it was hard to decipher if it's a female or male character speaking. Story wise, it was just okay.

Lawyerly and Literate

Nothing against Grisham, but this is the way to write a book about lawyers. Not only an engrossing plot, but real, thinking characters. The book also is read well. As good as Presumed Innocent--and that was a classic of this genre.

A good ordinary thriller

Communicating to other readers that a book is ordinary but that does not mean you should not listen to it is tough. Reversible error falls in this category. While listening to this book, you will not fall asleep while driving but nor will you look forward to long drives and thick traffic jams to reach the climax. The characters are reasonably interesting. The plot is intriguing at times with some twist and turns that you may not predict. Do not worry too much if you are not a choosy listener?enjoy.

Really liked this one

I've been a fan of Tros Kendall County books for more than 25 years, appreciating the power of good novelistic storytelling combined with correct legal procedure, often essential to the story. As here. This is one that I had not read before, but after recently hearing a number of others, good as they are, I think it may be the best that I've read of his. Turow is a master of intricate plotting and surprises that actually surprise, as well as leaving you in suspense about whether the gun on stage in the first act, gun or not, it's going to go off, you know it is, but when and how, that's something else.

He's also superb with multiple perspectives, although I wonder what women think of his female perspectives, particularly around the sex scenes. A major reservation, and this book is less problematic than some of his, is some unacceptable portrayal of Black people, not intended to be racist, but from the perspective of 2022, none the less actually racist, and it's quite disturbing. This is much less intrusive in reversible areas that in some books, such as Laws of our Fathers, Which manages to bollocks up sixties radicalism in a major way. As a Chicago lawyer, it's fun to see his Roman a clef versions of things I know, such as the Lincoln judge, but that's just an additional benefit.

The performance is good, although the transitions from one scene to another or sometimes a little bit peculiar in the sound quality, as if it pasted recordings together without concerning themselves about whether they really fit. Nonetheless, it's a good story, well narrated, worth listening to or reading.