Thinking LSAT Podcast By Nathan Fox and Ben Olson cover art

Thinking LSAT

Thinking LSAT

By: Nathan Fox and Ben Olson
Listen for free

Ben Olson and Nathan Fox started the Thinking LSAT Podcast to become better LSAT teachers and have some fun. Please 1) subscribe, 2) rate and review, and 3) send us questions: help@thinkinglsat.com. Don't pay for law school! Learn more at lsatdemon.comNathan Fox and Ben Olson
Episodes
  • The Free JD (Ep. 520)
    Aug 18 2025

    Ben and Nathan share strategies for using visualization to stay engaged in Reading Comprehension. They also explain that getting a full-ride to law school takes more than just a high LSAT score—your application timing, school choices, and willingness to walk away from weak offers all matter.

    ⁠Study with our Free Plan⁠

    ⁠Download our iOS app⁠

    ⁠Watch Episode 520 on YouTube⁠

    0:28 – How Law Schools Guide Career Decisions

    A Harvard alumnus describes losing his job in big law after publishing an op-ed criticizing the Trump administration. Nathan and Ben discuss how law schools recruit students under the banner of justice, but then steer them toward corporate law firms. The guys remind listeners: you can’t do public-interest work and make big-law money at the same time. Sending their students to big law is a choice that schools have a vested interest in.

    9:27 – UC Law SF Sweatshirt Drive

    Nathan shares an email from UC Law San Francisco (formerly Hastings) asking alums to buy sweatshirts for incoming 1Ls. He and Ben laugh at the school’s request for $40 sweatshirts while simultaneously charging students more than $50,000 in tuition per year.

    21:16 – Visualizing Passages

    Connor asks for advice on improving visualization skills in RC. Strong reading comprehension depends on pausing to visualize the text—especially when it’s abstract. Creating a mind map lets you evaluate each sentence and anticipate what’s coming next. If you’re not actively questioning and connecting ideas, you’re missing the forest for the trees.

    34:01 – Proctor Troubles

    Michael ran into issues with a proctor during his test and wonders if he should cancel his score. Ben and Nathan say there’s no advantage to canceling. The real question is whether his practice test results showed he was ready. Prepared students need not worry about minor test-day issues.

    37:51 – Don’t Settle for Sub-Par

    Mike has a 3.98 GPA and practice LSAT scores in the 170s. He’s considering applying in-state with a 166 but also wonders about his T-14 prospects. The guys advise Mike to take an additional gap year, score 170+, apply early, and secure scholarships at top schools, especially given his career aspirations.

    44:17 – Conditional Full Ride

    Theo adopted the motto of going to law school for free. After a gap year, he improved his LSAT, applied broadly, and accepted a full-ride scholarship to his top choice law school. The downside is that it’s a conditional scholarship. Nate encourages Theo to stick to his commitment not to pay for law school.

    52:37 – Personal Statement Gong Show

    Natalie is the next Gong Show contestant. In this segment, Ben and Nathan read your personal statement until they reach an unforgivable mistake—they then ring the gong. The record to beat is 34 lines, set by listener Sophia.

    1:08:34 - Word of the Week - Waylay

    I don’t want to waylay our meeting with this topic.

    Get caught up with our ⁠Word of the Week⁠⁠ library.

    Show more Show less
    1 hr and 11 mins
  • Rushing to Failure (Ep. 519)
    Aug 11 2025

    Ben and Nathan field a handful of questions with a common theme: they come from students who are moving too fast on the LSAT, attempting too many questions, and failing to understand what they’re reading. In other words, they’re rushing to failure.

    The solution is simple: Attempt one question at a time. If you miss it, review until you understand why. Then, move on to the next one. Slow down, skip all the gimmicks, and the LSAT becomes easy.

    ⁠Study with our Free Plan⁠

    ⁠Download our iOS app⁠

    ⁠Watch Episode 519 on YouTube⁠

    0:33 – Reading All Answer Choices

    Sydney asks if she can skip answer choices once she finds her prediction. Skimming bad answer choices is fine, but you still need to glance at all of them. You also don’t have to read every word. As soon as an answer starts moving in the wrong direction, eliminate it confidently and move on.

    8:35 – Master’s Degree to Make Up for a Low GPA?

    Joe recognizes that his undergraduate GPA will hurt his admissions chances and is considering a master’s degree to improve his odds. Ben and Nathan note that his 4.0 GPA in his senior year already shows he can succeed in law school. Graduate grades won’t factor into his LSAC GPA. Joe should focus instead on removing bad grades from his transcript and getting the best LSAT possible.

    13:37 – Mean LSAT Tweets

    After a 144 diagnostic, Chris sends Nate an angry email. Ben and Nathan outline the Demon’s resources for improvement—if Chris wants to use them. They also note that academically strong students often approach the LSAT like school: skimming, rushing, and relying on outside knowledge—habits that hurt scores.

    19:12 – Worst GPA You’ve Ever Seen

    Rachel has a 1.73 GPA and just wants to get into law school. The guys commend her paralegal experience but explain that her only shot is with a strong LSAT. Given her situation, she should consider part-time or state-accredited programs to reduce cost and risk.

    26:41 – Two-Word Accommodation Request

    A Reddit student gets 50% extra time for “severe anxiety” with a simple two-word doctor’s note. Ben and Nathan highlight the ease of securing accommodations but remind listeners that they aren’t necessary to succeed.

    34:30 – When to Take a Break

    Blake feels burnt out after hours of daily studying with little progress. The guys point out that he’s prioritizing quantity over quality. They advise him to skip September, focus on learning, and wait to take the official test when he’s ready.

    43:17 – ABA Journal

    Ben and Nathan scoff at the latest ABA Journal, which addresses loneliness, gambling addiction, and the California bar exam mishap just on the cover. Inside? A first-page ad asking lawyers to donate more money to the ABA with a testimonial from a dental hygienist.

    50:10 – What’s the Deal with Purdue Global Law School?

    Peter wants to know if Purdue Global Law School, a California-accredited law school, is worth applying to.

    1:09:40 - Personal Statement Gong Show

    Sophia signs up as the next Gong Show contestant. In this segment, Ben and Nathan read your personal statement until they reach an unforgivable mistake, then they ring the gong. The number of lines to beat is 21—the record currently held by listener Danielle.

    1:20:27 - Word of the Week - Ameliorate

    The new tutoring program was designed to ameliorate students’ struggles with reading comprehension.

    Get caught up with our ⁠Word of the Week⁠⁠ library.

    Show more Show less
    1 hr and 22 mins
  • Ticketmaster Vibes (Ep. 518)
    Aug 4 2025

    Thinking LSAT Show Notes

    In preparation for test week, Ben and Nathan remind students of a foundational piece of advice: treat the official test exactly like you would any other practice test. They apply that advice to everything from testing location decisions to your test week study plan.

    ⁠Study with our Free Plan⁠

    ⁠Download our iOS app⁠

    ⁠Watch Episode 518 on YouTube⁠

    0:25 – Ticketmasters

    Reddit is full of students panicking about unavailable test center seats due to a 50% increase in August registrations. Demon team members weigh in on the remote vs. in-person testing debate, with Ben and Nathan generally siding with online testing. While there can be proctor issues, they note that this isn’t a universal problem and argue that horror stories are often amplified on Reddit while the smooth administrations go unnoticed.

    7:36 – Eliminating 4 out of 5

    Demon student Tom highlights a valuable LSAT skill: confidently eliminating four answers even if you’re unsure why the fifth is right. Ben and Nathan explain the two paths to the correct answer—positive identification or conclusive elimination. When unsure of why a correct answer solves the problem, be sure to learn from that question in review, even if you get the question right.

    13:12 – The Week Before?

    Harry asks how to prepare in the final week before his test. The guys say to keep doing exactly what’s worked. They caution that even asking this question suggests Harry may be treating the official test differently from practice. Planning to use all five attempts reduces the pressure of any one test.

    19:50 – LSAT Demon Dashboard Ratings

    A listener asks about the purpose behind the Demon’s dashboard ratings and how to utilize them effectively. Ben and Nathan explain that there were two primary goals: motivation and more immediate feedback. They emphasize that rating changes aren’t always linear, and minor drops shouldn’t be discouraging.

    24:40 – Video Explanations for RC

    Connor wonders if he should still review RC videos when he got everything right. Ben and Nathan say yes—especially if the passage felt confusing or required guesswork. Watching how teachers read can improve your process, not just your accuracy.

    28:32 – Transcript Petition Success

    Megan shares how she successfully petitioned to remove bad grades from her transcript. Ben and Nathan read the letter she used and suggested others in similar situations should try this approach. They note that smart, respectful advocacy can yield real results.

    40:28 – Applying Broadly

    A student recounts accepting a partial scholarship and still facing six-figure debt. Ben and Nathan stress that 80% of law students receive scholarships and that partial offers can still lead to heavy debt burdens. Applicants should apply broadly and reject the idea that a “generous” offer is good enough if it means massive loans.

    Check out the LSAT Demon Scholarship Estimator

    47:00 - Word of the Week - Askance

    “The judge also looked askance at Anthropic’s acknowledgement that it had turned to downloading pirated books in order to save time and money in building its AI models.”

    Get caught up with our ⁠Word of the Week⁠⁠ library.

    Show more Show less
    51 mins
No reviews yet