• The Proctor Problem For The Prosecution Of Karen Read
    Jun 20 2024
    In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke discusses the problematic aspects of the prosecution in the Karen Read trial, particularly focusing on the lead investigator, Michael Proctor. Dreeke and Brueski delve into Proctor's testimony and the significant issues it raises regarding credibility, leadership, and investigative integrity. They highlight how Proctor's actions, driven by negative confirmation bias, have tainted the investigation, potentially affecting the trial's outcome and public trust in law enforcement. Dreeke emphasizes the importance of objectivity and proper leadership in investigations, critiquing Proctor's personal connections and behaviors that undermined his credibility. The conversation also touches on the broader implications of Proctor's actions for other cases he has been involved in, suggesting a pattern of behavior that may require further scrutiny. The discussion concludes with concerns about missing evidence and the overall integrity of the investigation, drawing parallels to other high-profile cases and highlighting the frustration within the community that has led to movements like "Free Karen Read."

    **Main Points:**
    - Discussion about Michael Proctor's problematic testimony in the Karen Read trial.
    - Importance of credible leadership in investigations.
    - Impact of negative confirmation bias on the integrity of investigations.
    - Proctor's personal connections and behaviors undermining his credibility.
    - Broader implications for other cases Proctor has been involved in.
    - Concerns about missing evidence and overall investigative integrity.
    - Community frustration leading to movements like "Free Karen Read."

    #MichaelProctor #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #RobinDreeke #TonyBrueski #InvestigativeIntegrity #FreeKarenRead

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show more Show less
    11 mins
  • 'She Waffled Him' Lead Investigator On Karen Read Case Claims In Crude Comment
    Jun 20 2024
    In the podcast episode of “Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski,” psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott delves into the ongoing trial of Karen Read, focusing on the testimony of Jen McCabe. Scott criticizes the defense’s aggressive approach, questioning its purpose and impact on the jury. She highlights the emotional responses of witnesses, particularly Jen McCabe, who faced prolonged harassment. Despite McCabe’s defiant attitude, Scott defends her reaction given the circumstances. The online harassment orchestrated by a blogger has significantly traumatized the witnesses and their families. The defense’s relentless questioning, including a detailed examination of McCabe’s Google search about hypothermia, amplifies witnesses’ distress and raises ethical concerns. Scott emphasizes the psychological impact on those involved in the trial, casting doubt on the defense’s overly complicated narrative.

    Main Points:

    • Emotional responses of witnesses, especially Jen McCabe, highlight the impact of prolonged harassment.
    • Jen McCabe’s defiant attitude is defended by Scott, considering the circumstances.
    • Online harassment orchestrated by a blogger has traumatized witnesses and their families.
    • The defense’s relentless questioning amplifies witnesses’ distress, raising ethical concerns.
    • Detailed examination of McCabe’s Google search about hypothermia becomes a focal point in court.
    • Psychological effects on those involved underscore the trial’s complexity.
    • Alcohol-induced impulsivity is discussed, but no evidence of premeditated murder exists in this case.
    #KarenRead #JenMcCabe #ShavaunScott #HiddenKillersPodcast #OnlineHarassment #CourtroomDrama #PsychologicalImpact


    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show more Show less
    6 mins
  • Evidence Clearly Shows John Proctor 'Protecting The Blue' At Karen Read Murder Trial
    Jun 20 2024
    In the latest episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," former Felony Prosecutor and attorney Eric Faddis delves into the troubling investigation and trial of Karen Read in the death of John O'Keefe. The conversation highlights the shocking and inappropriate testimony of Trooper Proctor, which has raised significant concerns about the integrity of the investigation. Faddis notes that the jury is likely taken aback by Proctor's language and behavior, causing them to re-evaluate the credibility of the evidence presented. The prosecution's case is further compromised by numerous evidentiary inconsistencies, such as missing Ring video footage and the early conclusions drawn by the police. Faddis argues that these factors might push the jury towards an acquittal, as the investigation appears severely flawed and biased. The discussion also touches on the broader issue of police misconduct and the potential cultural problems within the department. The handling of evidence and the perception of a cover-up by the police add layers of doubt, questioning the fairness of branding Karen Read with a conviction.

    - Former Felony Prosecutor Eric Faddis discusses the problematic testimony of Trooper Proctor in the trial of Karen Read.
    - Proctor's shocking and inappropriate language has raised concerns about the integrity of the investigation.
    - The jury might re-evaluate the credibility of the evidence due to Proctor's behavior.
    - Numerous evidentiary inconsistencies, such as missing Ring video footage, further compromise the prosecution's case.
    - Faddis suggests the investigation appears severely flawed and biased, potentially leading to an acquittal.
    - The broader issue of police misconduct and cultural problems within the department is highlighted.
    - Handling of evidence and the perception of a cover-up by the police add layers of doubt to the case.

    **Hashtags:**
    #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #EricFaddis #TrooperProctor #HiddenKillers #PoliceMisconduct #EvidentiaryIssues
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show more Show less
    9 mins
  • Defense Challenges Prosecution's Case with New Expert Testimonies in Karen Read Murder Trial
    Jun 20 2024
    The Karen Read murder trial saw significant developments as expert witnesses presented testimonies that challenge the prosecution's narrative. Judge Beverly Cannone addressed a potential discovery violation by the defense for introducing Dr. Marie Russell, a retired emergency doctor and forensic pathologist, late in the trial. Defense attorney Alan Jackson countered by accusing the state of also delaying discovery, pointing to a late interview with Jennifer McCabe conducted by Lt. Tully. READ-6-18-A potential discovery violation by the defense

    Dr. Russell testified that the injuries on John O'Keefe’s arm appeared to be more consistent with an animal attack rather than a motor vehicle accident. "Having seen hundreds and hundreds of car accident victims, I ruled that out very quickly," Dr. Russell stated. She further explained that the wounds were "consistent with a large dog attack... a combination of bite wounds and scratches."
    The judge questioned Dr. Russell about her qualifications, noting she had no training in accident reconstruction. Despite this, Jackson defended her inclusion, arguing, “We have contrary evidence and Ms. Read should be entitled to present that evidence.”
    Additionally, Dr. Daniel Wolfe and Dr. Andrew Rentschler from ARCCA, a private accident reconstruction company, provided their expert opinions. Dr. Wolfe, the Director of Accident Reconstruction at ARCCA, noted that the damage to Read's SUV did not align with it having struck O’Keefe. “The car didn’t hit him, and he wasn’t hit by the car. Period. Full stop,” Wolfe testified, referencing findings from a pretrial hearing.

    Dr. Rentschler, a biomechanical engineering specialist, supported this assertion, further questioning the prosecution’s evidence. Defense attorney Jackson highlighted these expert opinions to bolster the argument that O'Keefe’s injuries were not caused by Read’s vehicle.

    In response to the defense's presentation of Dr. Russell, ADA Lally requested the judge block her testimony, suggesting she tried to interject herself into the case too late. The judge acknowledged the complexity of the issue and stated she would make a ruling soon. She instructed ADA Lally to find a rebuttal witness in case Dr. Russell is allowed to testify.
    The trial continued without jurors present to allow for the voir dire of these expert witnesses, determining the admissibility and scope of their testimonies before the jury returns on Thursday.

    #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #JudgeCannone #MarieRussell #DanielWolfe #AndrewRentschler #CourtLiveUpdates
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show more Show less
    14 mins
  • How Did Police Screw Up The John O'Keefe Murder Investigation SO BADLY?
    Jun 19 2024
    In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," former Felony Prosecutor and attorney Eric Faddis discussed the troubling developments in the trial of Karen Read. Trooper Proctor's testimony, described as shocking and inappropriate, raises serious concerns about the prosecution's case. Faddis emphasized that as prosecutors, it's crucial to maintain professionalism and integrity, but Proctor's behavior seems to undermine this. The problematic nature of Proctor's testimony, combined with evidentiary inconsistencies, such as the missing Ring video footage and the taillight issue, casts doubt on the prosecution's case. Faddis argued that these factors collectively might lead the jury to question the reliability of the prosecution's evidence, potentially creating reasonable doubt. The conversation highlighted concerns about the broader implications of Proctor's conduct, suggesting it might reflect a deeper cultural issue within the police department. The discussion also included details of the missing Ring video and the questionable handling of evidence by law enforcement, further complicating the case against Karen Read.

    - Trooper Proctor's testimony is described as shocking, inappropriate, and problematic for the prosecution.
    - Proctor's behavior raises questions about the professionalism and integrity of the prosecution.
    - Evidentiary inconsistencies, including missing Ring video footage and the taillight issue, add to the case's complications.
    - The jury might question the prosecution's evidence, potentially creating reasonable doubt.
    - Concerns are raised about the broader cultural issues within the police department, suggested by Proctor's conduct.
    - The handling of critical evidence by law enforcement is brought into question, affecting the case against Karen Read.
    - The missing Ring video and discrepancies in testimony further undermine the prosecution's position.
    #KarenRead #EricFaddis #TrooperProctor #HiddenKillers #EvidentiaryIssues #ReasonableDoubt #ProsecutionProblems
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show more Show less
    8 mins
  • Judge to Rule on Crucial Video Evidence as Karen Read Murder Trial Resumes
    Jun 19 2024
    The Karen Read murder trial continues with Judge Beverly Cannone set to rule on a pivotal piece of video evidence. The video, captured by a surveillance camera in John O’Keefe’s driveway, shows Read’s black Lexus SUV backing out on January 29, 2022. Read’s defense attorneys suggest that she may have accidentally reversed into O’Keefe's car, damaging her taillight.
    In a recent testimony, Trooper Joseph Paul, a Massachusetts State Police crash reconstructionist, stated that Read’s SUV was traveling at a speed of up to 24 mph when it struck O’Keefe. This speed, according to Paul, would be sufficient to cause the damage observed. Paul testified that John O’Keefe was struck by Karen Read’s SUV traveling in reverse at up to 24 mph, projecting him more than 30 feet. He described the impact on O’Keefe’s arm and shoulder and addressed questions about the location of debris and key cycles recorded by Read’s vehicle.
    During cross-examination, defense attorney Alan Jackson challenged Paul’s qualifications and the methods he used to reach his conclusions.
    Paul’s testimony is crucial as it attempts to establish the speed and dynamics of the collision. However, the defense laid into Trooper Paul's theory.

    The trial has seen several key witnesses take the stand. Forensics software expert Ian Whiffin testified about a Google search made by Jennifer McCabe, "how long to die in the cold," which was conducted at 6:23 a.m., raising suspicions about the timeline of events. Whiffin clarified that the timestamp initially thought to be 2:27 a.m. was misleading, as it only reflected when the search tab was opened which was 6:23am. He also discussed the possibility of data tampering, concluding it was highly unlikely.
    Nicholas Guarino detailed the analysis of electronic devices, including phones and computers, and the steps taken to bypass security measures on Read’s phone. He highlighted the significant GPS data found on O’Keefe’s phone, in contrast to Read’s. He also read text messages between John and Karen, but before he did that, he muttered something to himself, did he say, " Kill me?"

    The trial has brought to light various technical and forensic details, with each side presenting evidence to support their narrative. The ruling on the video evidence by Judge Cannone is anticipated to have a significant impact on the case’s outcome.

    - Judge Beverly Cannone to rule on crucial video evidence in the Karen Read trial.
    - Video shows Karen Read’s SUV potentially damaging her taillight while backing out of John O’Keefe’s driveway.
    - Trooper Joseph Paul testified that Read’s SUV was traveling at 24 mph when it struck O’Keefe.
    - Forensics expert Ian Whiffin testified about Jennifer McCabe’s suspicious Google search.
    - Trooper Nicholas Guarino analyzed electronic devices related to the case.

    #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #JudgeCannone #JosephPaul #IanWhiffin #NicholasGuarino #CourtLiveUpdates

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show more Show less
    20 mins
  • The Trial of Karen Read: Boyfriend Cop Murder Trial – MA v. Karen Read Day 27 Part 1
    Jun 18 2024
    Welcome to a special episode of "The Trial of Karen Read," where today, we find ourselves inside the courtroom of the case against Karen Read. As we set the stage, let's briefly summarize the case that has gripped the public's attention.

    Karen Read is facing charges related to the death of John O'Keefe, whose unexpected passing under mysterious circumstances led to intense police scrutiny. The case hinges on a combination of forensic evidence, alleged motives, and Karen's own statements to the police. Prosecutors argue that Karen had both the means and opportunity to commit the crime, citing contentious relationships and financial disputes as possible motives. The defense counters that the evidence is circumstantial and that Karen's connection to John's death is being misconstrued.

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

    Show more Show less
    40 mins
  • The Trial of Karen Read: Boyfriend Cop Murder Trial – MA v. Karen Read Day 27 Part 2
    Jun 18 2024
    Welcome to a special episode of "The Trial of Karen Read," where today, we find ourselves inside the courtroom of the case against Karen Read. As we set the stage, let's briefly summarize the case that has gripped the public's attention.

    Karen Read is facing charges related to the death of John O'Keefe, whose unexpected passing under mysterious circumstances led to intense police scrutiny. The case hinges on a combination of forensic evidence, alleged motives, and Karen's own statements to the police. Prosecutors argue that Karen had both the means and opportunity to commit the crime, citing contentious relationships and financial disputes as possible motives. The defense counters that the evidence is circumstantial and that Karen's connection to John's death is being misconstrued.

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

    Show more Show less
    49 mins