Episodios

  • Mega Edition: Virginia Roberts Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 7-10) (4/15/26)

    Mega Edition: Virginia Roberts Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 7-10) (4/15/26)
    Apr 16 2026
    The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.

    What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    1257-12.pdf
    Más Menos
    53 m
  • Mega Edition: Virginia Roberts Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 4-6) (4/15/26)

    Mega Edition: Virginia Roberts Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 4-6) (4/15/26)
    Apr 16 2026
    The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.

    What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    1257-12.pdf
    Más Menos
    44 m
  • Mega Edition: Virginia Roberts Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 1-3) (4/15/26)

    Mega Edition: Virginia Roberts Deposition in Edwards and Cassell v. Alan Dershowitz (Part 1-3) (4/15/26)
    Apr 16 2026
    The videotaped deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre taken on January 16, 2016, in Fort Lauderdale sits at the center of the bitter legal war between Epstein survivors’ attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell and Alan Dershowitz, who was accused by Giuffre of sexually abusing her when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. In the deposition, Giuffre gives a detailed, sworn narrative of how she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, groomed, trafficked to powerful men, and moved across multiple jurisdictions while still underage. She identifies Epstein’s residences, flight patterns, intermediaries, and specific encounters, placing her allegations firmly inside the broader trafficking structure rather than as isolated claims. The testimony was preserved on video precisely because her lawyers anticipated that credibility, consistency, and demeanor would become central issues in the defamation battle that followed. It also captured Giuffre under oath before years of public pressure, media narratives, and evolving legal strategies could reshape the record.

    What made this deposition legally explosive was its direct role in the defamation and civil litigation between Dershowitz and the Edwards–Cassell team, after Giuffre publicly accused Dershowitz and he responded with an aggressive campaign claiming she had fabricated the allegations and falsely implicated him. The video became a critical piece of evidence in determining whether Giuffre’s statements were knowingly false or grounded in a consistent trafficking account supported by contemporaneous detail. Dershowitz’s lawyers later argued that contradictions, memory gaps, and timeline disputes undermined her credibility, while Giuffre’s side pointed to the overall coherence of her narrative and the corroborating travel and contact records emerging in parallel cases. Long before the unsealing battles and public reckonings, this deposition quietly locked in one of the earliest comprehensive sworn accounts of Epstein’s trafficking network—and the legal fault line that would later fracture the reputations of some of the most powerful lawyers and institutions tied to the case.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    1257-12.pdf
    Más Menos
    40 m
  • How Oligarchs Avoid Sanctions

    How Oligarchs Avoid Sanctions
    Apr 16 2026
    One of the main points of investigation for us has been the money chase. Jeffrey Epstein was very proficient at manipulating the financial market and stashing money offshore and in this episode, we take a look at some other Oligarchs who have also mastered the art of the steal.

    (Commercial at 26:43)

    To contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/09/us/russian-oligarchs-sanctions-dubai.html
    Más Menos
    41 m
  • The Wild Claims Made By Victoria Hervey About The Picture

    The Wild Claims Made By Victoria Hervey About The Picture
    Apr 16 2026
    In this look back episode...


    In what can only be called borderline Alex Jones territory, Lady Victoria Hervey is doubling down on her wild claims about the photo of Andrew being a forgery. In tonight's episode we hear from her as she goes on an unhinged rant about a conspiracy to topple the monarchy.



    To contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10476511/Prince-Andrews-ex-Lady-Victoria-Hervey-44-claims-Virginia-Giuffre-edited-image-Prince-Andrew.html
    Más Menos
    29 m
  • Robert Maxwell And His Paranoid State Before His Death

    Robert Maxwell And His Paranoid State Before His Death
    Apr 16 2026
    In the months and years leading up to his death, Robert Maxwell became increasingly distrustful and paranoid, convinced that those closest to him were plotting behind his back. He had his offices secretly wired so he could eavesdrop on his employees and even his own family members, creating an atmosphere of fear within his empire. Once known as a charismatic and domineering media tycoon, Maxwell’s behavior grew erratic—he would lash out at staff, accuse them of betrayal, and micromanage even the smallest details of his companies. His paranoia extended to his financial affairs, where he grew obsessed with hiding the truth about his massive debts and pension fund manipulations, leading him to retreat further into secrecy and denial.


    By the final months of his life, Maxwell had become almost delusional in his distrust. He isolated himself aboard his yacht, the Lady Ghislaine, surrounded by loyalists and bodyguards while cutting off communication with anyone he didn’t fully control. Reports and tapes from that period show a man consumed by suspicion, believing that enemies in government, media, and even within his own business circle were conspiring to bring him down. His death at sea—officially ruled accidental but still clouded in mystery—seemed to encapsulate the final unraveling of a man trapped in his own web of lies, surveillance, and fear.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    16 m
  • What Role Did King Charles Play In The Prince Andrew Settlement?

    What Role Did King Charles Play In The Prince Andrew Settlement?
    Apr 15 2026
    Prince Andrew owes Virginia Roberts big money and the question of where he would get these funds to make his debt whole are now being answered. According to a new report by the Sun, Prince Charles will be picking up the lion's share of the debt and Andrew is supposedly paying that money back when the sale of his house goes through.

    But...don't worry. No public money is being used.

    (Commercial at 12:37)

    To contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/17863343/prince-charles-bankroll-brother-andrew-sex-abuse-payout-loan/
    Más Menos
    18 m
  • Mike Johnson Slips: Did He Just Admit Epstein Was an Intelligence Tool?

    Mike Johnson Slips: Did He Just Admit Epstein Was an Intelligence Tool?
    Apr 15 2026
    In his recent remarks about the Jeffrey Epstein files, Mike Johnson shifted from publicly demanding transparency to cautioning that the disclosure could “publicly reveal the identity … of undercover law-enforcement officers” and “chill” whistle-blowers. He argued that releasing the full files might weaken future investigations and endanger informants, effectively invoking national‐security style protections for evidence he suggested could have implications beyond the usual criminal records.


    By repeatedly emphasizing the danger of exposure — without detailing what those dangers are — Johnson appears to signal that Epstein’s case may not merely be a private criminal network but intertwined with intelligence or covert operations. His insistence on protecting sources, methods, and “sensitive” information aligns more with the language used when classified intelligence assets are involved than when standard prosecution files are at issue. Combined with longstanding rumors that Epstein might have functioned as an intelligence asset, Johnson’s position implicitly buttresses the theory: that some of the Epstein documents may sit in a realm where disclosure truly threatens national-security interests.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    12 m