Regular price: $38.49

Membership details Membership details
  • A 30-day trial plus your first audiobook, free.
  • 1 credit/month after trial – good for any book, any price.
  • Easy exchanges – swap any book you don’t love.
  • Keep your audiobooks, even if you cancel.
  • After your trial, Audible is just $14.95/month.
  • Get access to the Member Daily Deal
OR
In Cart

Publisher's Summary

The first comprehensive historical biography of Laura Ingalls Wilder, the beloved author of the Little House on the Prairie book series

Millions of fans of Little House on the Prairie believe they know Laura Ingalls - the pioneer girl who survived blizzards and near-starvation on the Great Plains, and the woman who wrote the famous autobiographical books. But the true story of her life has never been fully told. Now, drawing on unpublished manuscripts, letters, diaries, and land and financial records, Caroline Fraser - the editor of the Library of America edition of the Little House series - masterfully fills in the gaps in Wilder's biography, setting the record straight regarding charges of ghostwriting that have swirled around the books and uncovering the grown-up story behind the most influential childhood epic of pioneer life.

Set against nearly a century of epochal change, from the Homestead Act and the Indian Wars to the Dust Bowl and the Great Depression, Wilder's dramatic life provides a unique perspective on American history and our national mythology of self-reliance. Offering fresh insight and new discoveries about Wilder's life and times, Prairie Fires is the definitive book about Wilder and her world.

Caroline Fraser is the editor of the Library of America edition of Laura Ingalls Wilder's Little House books and the author of Rewilding the World and God's Perfect Child. Her writing has appeared in The New York Review of Books, The New Yorker, The Atlantic, the Los Angeles Times, and the London Review of Books, among other publications. She lives in New Mexico.

©2017 Caroline Fraser (P)2017 Recorded Books

What members say

Average Customer Ratings

Overall

  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    334
  • 4 Stars
    137
  • 3 Stars
    58
  • 2 Stars
    16
  • 1 Stars
    10

Performance

  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    332
  • 4 Stars
    112
  • 3 Stars
    42
  • 2 Stars
    18
  • 1 Stars
    5

Story

  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    312
  • 4 Stars
    118
  • 3 Stars
    49
  • 2 Stars
    19
  • 1 Stars
    12
Sort by:
  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Leslie
  • abingdon, MD, USA
  • 03-05-18

Spoiler Alert: Do Not Read If You Don’t Want Your Childhood Memories Destroyed

The narration for this book is some of the best I’ve listened to; the story itself was well organized and presented in a clear and entertaining fashion. That being said, the picture drawn of Laura Ingalls Wilder makes her all too human and much less sympathetic than she made herself out to be in her Little House novels. The other members of her family - especially her daughter - fare no better. The truth may set one free, but in this instance that freedom comes at the expense of a much beloved American myth.

It should be noted that Ms. Fraser does an excellent job weaving the geopolitical vagaries of Wilder’s lifetime with her personal ups and downs. I was struck by the similarities between today’s social dysfunction/division and that experienced by Americans 100 years ago. Different era, same issues. We appear doomed to eternally repeat the same discourse, the same socioeconomic battles.

Excellent read if you’re ready to put aside another childhood “truth”.

16 of 16 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    3 out of 5 stars
  • JB
  • Nebraska
  • 01-20-18

Prairie Thunderstorm Engaging with a Tornado of Bias.

If you are like me the first item with an audio title is the narration. It is very well presented. Despite a few pronunciation glitches, for example Pierre, the production is enjoyable to listen to.

Fraser’s presentation is not for the faint of heart Little House fairy tale reader so be ready for a bumpy ride if you are.

This is a dual bio of Wilder and Lane set against a heavy dose of historical backdrop. And almost immediately this is where Fraser goes off the rails. She will recover at times and I stuck with her because the topic is so interesting to me.

Fraser is no historian and it shows. She makes many mistakes that sometimes appear to be just sloppy work. While others are clearly set piece to support a bias. For which she has many.

I gather from a quick look at her other work she has done some environmental writing. And she brings this to Little House as subtle as a Hurricane

The Homestead Act, homesteading and westward expansion are fundamental to the story. A clear understanding is obviously the foundation to the entire work. Fraser brings her environmental focus like a crusade into the story. The Ingalls and Wilders were simply duped into a “scam,” destined to fail because the Homestead Act was a failure and then were complicit in fraud and get this - climate change. Yes Almanzo with his two row sulky plow caused global climate change induced drought.

With that the reader may ask if Fraser has a grasp on 19th century agricultural practices, as this would form another foundation to the story? Well no, she doesn’t. For example, she will indict Almanzo as committing fraud in his HA claim because he left. She ignores the fact that a homesteader had six months to occupy said claim & this was because they would have had no crop or supplies to support the stock.

Almanzo, according to Fraser, committed fraud by lying about his age on the HA application. This being another example of how terrible the process was. Here we have a clear case of ‘fraud’ on her part. It would be difficult to see it otherwise. The records are clear and can be easily checked with NARA docs.

Almanzo’s age issue was Wilder and Lane playing with facts decades later. This is well known and Fraser knows that Lane in particular is fast and loose with facts. But we have to get the fraud angle worked in somehow.

Little picture things are sprinkled throughout. For example, a “Missouri posse” fought a “proxy war” in “squatter Kansas.” Boy that’s a lot to unpack. A posse is a legal group raised by a sheriff. She does like a posse and will use the word incorrectly multiple times. The Missourian’s were most often called Bushwackers. The era known as Bleeding Kansas was not a “proxy war.” I am not sure what her “squatter” context even is. But there is no historical one for it. I imagine it is another bias against the entire settlement process.

Keystone South Dakota is not at 9,100 ft elevation. Google can be a friend to an author’s fact checker. Although I doubt one was used, a history undergrad intern would have caught most of this.

When covering the move from Wisconsin to Mo/Ks she will use 1850’s overland travel as an example. The Wilders were not going 3,000 miles across unsettled land on a trail of tears covered in burials. It was 1869 in settled Iowa and Missouri.

It is unfortunate we have another title in the Little House pantheon that comes at it from a literary point. Fraser would have done well to stick hard and fast to her area of expertise. I found these sections interesting, but always there is the “can I trust this on a subject I am less knowledgable in?”

Even more unfortunate is the Little House fan who wants to more and uses Fraser exclusively will take this as history. It most certainly is not and note Amazon did not classify it in that category.

If one wants to learn Wilder and her times, Pioneer Girl would be a much better source. Then one could read other secondary sources on areas of interest. For example, Edwards, Homesteading the Plains will show you that it was neither a “failure” or a “fraud.”

139 of 160 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    3 out of 5 stars

Don’t read if you don’t want your fond memories...

…of the Little House on the Prairie books or the TV series from the ‘70s entirely ruined.

Because I had read A Wilder Rose (fictionalized version on Rose Wilder Lane’s life based on a fair amount of research, it seems), my fond memories were already trashed, so I thought I’d listen to nonfiction. Things just got worse. Laura Ingalls Wilder is not particularly likeable (though very industrious) and her daughter, Rose is a lying, delusional, wretch. She seems bi-polar, narcissistic, and/or had borderline personality disorder.

I didn’t really know that the Ingall’s and the Wilder’s lives were always one step shy of completely falling apart, how poor they were, the reckless/impulsive/bad decisions that “Pa” and then Almanzo made.

What I most appreciated was that his story was replaced into historical context. Had it not been, I’m not sure I could have gotten through 21 hours. It was fairly depressing, and really Rose Wilder Lane…ugh. Lots of quotations from her personal diaries and letters. Add to the above that she was cruel, a racist and anti-Semite, always trying to undermine her mother. It was just too much and overwhelmed Wilder's story.

52 of 61 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    1 out of 5 stars

Wrong title

This book should be called "Laura Ingalls Wilder's daughter was a horrible person." I did not purchase this book to get the incredibly detailed account of all of Wilder's' daughter's fundamentally wrong-headed choices in life, but that is what I got - hours of it. Moore's grating and complaining voice made it even worse.
Incredibly annoying and disappointing!

27 of 32 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    1 out of 5 stars

The only book I've ever returned

I have never returned a book in my entire life until this one. Authors invest so much of themselves in their work I have always looked for something positive to take away from every book. Needless to say, I've read some pretty bad stuff. I truly tried to get through this. The bottom line is that there is hours of content describing someone with a mental disorder. The author not only repeats reports Ms. Wilders daughters behavior patterns over and over and over again but is judgemental of her. It feels like being trapped in a stalled elevator with a terribly negative person who just will not shut up.

17 of 20 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Elaine
  • Timpson, TX, United States
  • 05-17-18

More about Rose than Laura

I bought this book because I thought it would be the most comprehensive history of Laura's life, since, you know, the publisher's summary calls it "the first comprehensive historical biography of Laura Ingalls Wilder." I wanted to know what her life story REALLY was, particularly all the things her books left out. This book doesn't do much more than summarize Laura's youth, and i didn't get much out of it that isn't in the Wikipedia article. Most of what we get about Laura's childhood in this book is told by summarizing her books or quoting from _Pioneer Girl_. Perhaps that's because there isn't much documentary evidence from those years--if so, I wish Fraser had spent a bit more time explaining--in a scholarly way--what we don't know, and how we know what we DO know.

But man, this book tells me everything I needed to know about Rose, and more. Wow, she sounds like she was a horrible person! And listening to it, you get the feeling that Fraser hates Rose so much that she relishes dredging up every unpleasant detail, kind of like how in 8th grade you couldn't wait to retell mean gossip about that girl you don't like. It didn't help that the narrator's voice struck me as high-pitched and smug.

Still, I wouldn't call this book a waste of a credit: I definitely learned some things I didn't know, although I wish the book were 5 hours shorter (at least). I should have read it in a hard copy so I could see the pictures and skip the boring parts.

3 of 3 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    2 out of 5 stars

Interesting but tedious.

Ironically, half the book drones on about how to edit a book- they should have taken their own advice and edited this book. It could have been half the length and it would have made a better story.

2 of 2 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    2 out of 5 stars

Was Looking Forward To More Factual History

I'm only half-way through this book but not sure if I can finish. I was hoping to get a factual history of the family but the author diverges frequently and adds her political bias to the story. I find myself cringing at times and wishing she would get back to the reason I bought this book to begin with. There are interesting tidbits throughout if you don't mind putting up with the writer's opinions.

2 of 2 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    1 out of 5 stars

Disappointing

I really tried to like this book but its dull as dishwater. Its very disappointing as I've been a fan of The Little House series since I was little. Save your credit or money and buy something else.

2 of 2 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    4 out of 5 stars

get this woman an editor!

This book was an exhaustive history of the American Midwest and it's settling by this family. The depth of detail however was kind of crazy. It suffered from too much detail. There are long passages she could have condensed without losing anything. Mentioning every letter or exchange between the mother and daughter is extremely tedious. The daughter really does sound bipolar. The political slant through the last half was very interesting in light of the current president and the movement to have less government in our lives.

8 of 10 people found this review helpful