Regular price: $31.50

Free with 30-day trial
Membership details Membership details
  • A 30-day trial plus your first audiobook, free
  • 1 credit/month after trial – good for any book, any price
  • Easy exchanges – swap any book you don’t love
  • Keep your audiobooks, even if you cancel
  • After your trial, Audible is just $14.95/month
OR
In Cart

Publisher's Summary

It was never supposed to be this close. And of course she was supposed to win. How Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election to Donald Trump is the tragic story of a sure thing gone off the rails. For every Comey revelation or hindsight acknowledgment about the electorate, no explanation of defeat can begin with anything other than the core problem of Hillary's campaign - the candidate herself.

Through deep access to insiders from the top to the bottom of the campaign, political writers Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes have reconstructed the key decisions and unseized opportunities, the well-intentioned misfires and the hidden thorns that turned a winnable contest into a devastating loss. Drawing on the authors' deep knowledge of Hillary from their previous book, the acclaimed biography HRC, Shattered will offer an object lesson in how Hillary herself made victory an uphill battle, how her difficulty articulating a vision irreparably hobbled her impact with voters, and how the campaign failed to internalize the lessons of populist fury from the hard-fought primary against Bernie Sanders.

Moving blow by blow from the campaign's difficult birth through the bewildering terror of election night, Shattered tells an unforgettable story with urgent lessons both political and personal, filled with revelations that will change the way listeners understand just what happened to America on November 8, 2016.

©2017 Jonathan Allen, Amie Parnes (P)2017 Random House Audio

What members say

Average Customer Ratings

Overall

  • 4.1 out of 5.0
  • 5 Stars
    873
  • 4 Stars
    555
  • 3 Stars
    282
  • 2 Stars
    75
  • 1 Stars
    65

Performance

  • 4.3 out of 5.0
  • 5 Stars
    964
  • 4 Stars
    452
  • 3 Stars
    180
  • 2 Stars
    50
  • 1 Stars
    35

Story

  • 4.1 out of 5.0
  • 5 Stars
    802
  • 4 Stars
    455
  • 3 Stars
    265
  • 2 Stars
    85
  • 1 Stars
    69
Sort by:
  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

disappointing reading

I would have loved this book. The slow, mechanical reader completely ruined this for me. I'm a regular political junkie, but this was just unlistenable.

28 of 30 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Better read than heard

Any additional comments?

I looked forward to reading this book and discovering the dynamics of the of Hillary Clinton campaign. I was quite disappointed. Much of analysis struck me as superficial, even though the authors managed to quote a lot of people. Something didn’t quite ring true. But since I listened to, rather than read, this book, I am not quite sure.My biggest difficulty with Shattered was with the reader. She stamped every line with her own snarky personal interpretation and this had to have altered the meaning of the written words in some way. If I listen to a book ready by an author, I know that the way she says something is the way she means it. In this case, I wonder if the authors agree with the interpretation of their chosen reader.In the end, I believe this is a book better read than listened to.

27 of 30 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Disappointed

It didn't really measure up to the "insider information" as touted. The story seemed to follow what was out there as public knowledge.

21 of 25 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Kept At Arms Length From Hillary

What made the experience of listening to Shattered the most enjoyable?

The reader is very clear. I was able to listen at increased speed and get every word. The book itself is well paced.

What did you like best about this story?

The inside view of the Clinton Campaign.

Any additional comments?

I wish some of the comments in the conclusion had been made at the beginning of the book. In particular, the explanation of how the authors knew what people were thinking. Often Shattered includes statements about what Clinton or Obama thought. "Humm, how did they get in their head," I would wonder. That is explained.<br/><br/>The book works to show Clinton from many angles, but paints Republicans with one wide brush. <br/><br/>In many instances the book does not really take us behind the scenes as much as we'd like. It doesn't keep us close to Clinton, it keeps moving to campaign staff. We get very very familiar with the people working for Hillary, but are often kept at arms length from the main character. <br/><br/>What exactly happened on election night? According to Shattered, all was calm and collect on Hillary's end. A few calls from the President, a thoughtful night on how to step aside gracefully. No explosions. And maybe that's how it was. But it again gives the reader a feeling that they aren't being shown everything.

15 of 18 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

It's no "Game Change"

What could have made this a 4 or 5-star listening experience for you?

If it had some real insight into the campaigns.

Would you ever listen to anything by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes again?

Probably not.

If you could play editor, what scene or scenes would you have cut from Shattered?

The authors are clearly Hillary supporters and their partisanship ruins the book unless you are a Hillary fanboy. I would cut out the blatant bias and cheap shots when describing The Hillary's primary opponents and Republican adversaries, which ruins the objectivity of the book.

Any additional comments?

It's no "Game Change", the behind the scenes book on the 2008 election.<br/><br/>

26 of 33 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Shattered: Any chance this book is objective!

Allen and Parnes somehow missed the facts that Hillary chose to have an unsecured server, that the content of the e-mails "leaked" was accurate, that her own history of endless scandals and obfuscation AND THAT THEY ARE BOTH UBER-LIBERALS! This account paints Hillary as the American version of Mother Teresa and Bill as the victim of a one-time seduction , repentant and contrite, rather than a serial adulterer and his chief enabler whose blind political ambition outstripped any other motivation.

2 of 2 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Good, But Slanted

The book is a thorough revisit of the 2016 election. My only problem with it is that it has selective memory of the things that Clinton thought caused her loss For example, the book describes the Wikileaks dump dominating that week's news cycle far more than the Access Hollywood tape release.

Anyone who watched cable news during that week would know that about 90% of coverage was dedicated to the Access Hollywood tape. The book goes on to argue that the Comey letter and the Wikileak dump as unfair to Clinton without recognizing that the Access Hollywood tape may have been seen as unfair to Trump, but perhaps even more so.

Other than the subtle slant towards Clinton in what purportedly caused Clinton to lose the election, the book is still worth reading.

2 of 2 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Shallow and superficial

What disappointed you about Shattered?

It was like a long power point presentation. this book lacked depth in detail and insight, and it lack a sense of reality. This book is full of fluff and is very one sided. <br/>Many topics where understated such as the email or Behngazi issues, lacking a sense of reality and seriousness. The author dances around accountability on many issues and dismisses many issues on republican propaganda. The author also states many opinions as facts and so obviously spinning in favor of Hillary.

What did you like about the performance? What did you dislike?

the reader could not help improve the blain content.

2 of 2 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

The most skewed left wing sympathetic pile of crap

What disappointed you about Shattered?

This nonsensical trash was written by two Hillary sycophants who obviously wanted Hillary to win and were "Shattered" by her disgusting embarrassing performance. They spend the entire book making excuses and finding clever ways to blame EVERYONE in the world for Hillary's dishonesty and lousy candidacy.

Would you ever listen to anything by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes again?

NO!

Would you be willing to try another one of Kimberly Farr’s performances?

NO!

You didn’t love this book... but did it have any redeeming qualities?

They spent a lot of time writing it.

Any additional comments?

I want my money back!

2 of 2 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Hillary's blessing?

When I heard about this "tell all" book sharing the behind the scenes story of the Clinton campaign I thought that if the authors were brave enough to tell the story than I would read it. After finishing it though, I wonder if Mrs Clinton was really taking long, reflective walks in the woods or sitting in her home office helping them write this book. I can only imagine this project had her and the Clinton machines blessing. It's propaganda. Nothing more and nothing less.

74 of 101 people found this review helpful

Sort by:
  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story
  • Amazon Customer
  • 06-04-17

To lose an election to Trump takes some doing

If you're looking for a politically neutral narrative then you won't find it here.

Too hagiographic at times, the book gives too much importance to the Comey letter as the main reason for her loss, but two days before the election Comey cleared her again which should resulted in a late surge. Earlier she had struggled against an improbabile Bernie Sanders..in a country with a female majority more white women -like herself voted for Trump so the misogyny excuse doesn't make sense either

3 of 3 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story
  • Tommy
  • 06-24-17

Compelling and entertaining

The inside story of the struggles and dramatic collapse of Hillary Clinton's 2016 Presidential election campaign makes for a compelling and entertaining listen.

The book was compiled largely from off-the-record insider testimony, which means that much of it is unverifiable, but on the whole it comes across as credible and plausible.

I felt though that the authors glossed over the issue of Hillary's apparent toxicity within her own party during the protracted primary season and within the wider electorate in November.

Doug Wead in "Game of Thorns" convincingly attributes this to the scandals that dogged her husband's career in local and national politics.

"Shattered" would have benefitted from its own analysis of these issues and the extent to which they ruined Clinton's dream of a return to the White House.

The book's conclusion is marred somewhat by the authors' acceptance at face value of Clinton's dubious "The Russians hacked the election" excuse for her loss, despite its complete absence as an issue during the campaign itself.

2 of 2 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story
  • G. Raney
  • 04-20-17

Book should have been called POOR BRAVE HILLARY

If this book wasn’t for you, who do you think might enjoy it more?

The only people who will enjoy this book are those who are 100% for Hillary and the Democratic Party as it stands today. Anyone else who is looking for a well researched, open minded , unbiased, even handed book might as well forget it.

Has Shattered put you off other books in this genre?

No, but I will be researching the authors more closely before buying another one.

Have you listened to any of Kimberly Farr’s other performances? How does this one compare?

I have not and she did fine. The problem was not the reader.

What character would you cut from Shattered?

Can't cut any characters

Any additional comments?

I knew this was a Hillary apology book by page four or so, but managed to get through it. The authors either have no idea how to research, how to interpret what they learn, or they just don't want to. To say they are biased is an understatement. From all the hype I was expecting an even handed handling of the subject and found that not to be the case. Some big events like Bill Clinton's impeachment are glossed over and almost trivialized ........Hint to the authors.... No, Bill was not impeached for having extra marital sex, he was impeached for lying under oath and obstruction of justice. I think it had something to do with him being accused of sexual harassment or something not very nice, that I know Hillary has said was bad bad bad when others were accused of it. The email debacle is glossed over. Neither author bothered to really look into it or question the fact that Hillary got away with something that any lower level civil servant would have been fired, prosecuted and fined for. Their lives would have been destroyed. And on and on it goes with glossing over events that are easily researched if the authors were serious. America is still misogynist because it didn't elect Hillary. The fact that she is not trusted, even by liberals like Camille Paglia, is not a problem or even delved into. The authors also overuse the standard description of anyone who is not pro Hillary like misogynist, racist, non college educated, bigot...blah blah blah......... Hillary's faults are not looked into very deeply. She is misunderstood, tired, not feeling well and her team was not always up to the job. Hillary's biggest fault is that she cares too much! But then anyone who is truly trying to write a non biased even handed book might have delved into some of her real problems and come up with the conclusion that just maybe Hillary had too much history and baggage to win the election. The Democrats picked the wrong woman.

8 of 14 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story
  • Paul c
  • 09-27-17

Good book

Interesting insight to the Clinton election defeat. Detailed background to the reason of here failure. A gripping lead up to the election and sad realisation of her defeat and bases of it.

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story
  • Anonymous User
  • 05-19-17

Can't stop listening!

Am totally gripped, such an interesting tale of twists and turns. Strongly recommend. Loving it.

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story
  • Jack
  • 05-15-17

If you're a political nerd, you'll like this book.

However, whilst I consider politics a big interest of mine, this book was too detailed in some areas.

It needed to frame Trump, and why he won, better.

Sort by:
  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story
  • Joshua
  • 05-13-17

A stark reminder why they lost...

What would have made Shattered better?

The book has some soft criticisms of the Clinton's, the kind you might roll out in a job interview, 'Interviewer - what is a weakness of yours' HRC - 'I am too community minded and gave so much of myself to help others'.<br/><br/>The too long didn't read summation of this book is 'James Comey and white non educated voters cost HRC the election. HRC is amazing'.

What was most disappointing about Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes ’s story?

It glossed over HRC's weaknesses and minimised her involvement in scandal after scandal.

What does Kimberly Farr bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you had only read the book?

Good voice inflection.

What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?

A quizzical understanding of the mindset of American Liberals.

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story
  • Anonymous User
  • 05-02-17

well read

The book was well read. The story is interesting, but it is a bit all over the place. Still interesting.