Science Fictions

How Fraud, Bias, Negligence, and Hype Undermine the Search for Truth

De: Stuart Ritchie

Narrado por: Stuart Ritchie

An insider’s view of science reveals why many scientific results cannot be relied upon—and how the system can be reformed.

Science is how we understand the world. Yet failures in peer review and mistakes in statistics have rendered a shocking number of scientific studies useless—or, worse, badly misleading. Such errors have distorted our knowledge in fields as wide-ranging as medicine, physics, nutrition, education, genetics, economics, and the search for extraterrestrial life. As Science Fictions makes clear, the current system of research funding and publication not only fails to safeguard us from blunders but actively encourages bad science—with sometimes deadly consequences.

Stuart Ritchie’s own work challenging an infamous psychology experiment helped spark what is now widely known as the “replication crisis,” the realization that supposed scientific truths are often just plain wrong. Now, he reveals the very human biases, misunderstandings, and deceptions that undermine the scientific endeavor: from contamination in science labs to the secret vaults of failed studies that nobody gets to see; from outright cheating with fake data to the more common, but still ruinous, temptation to exaggerate mediocre results for a shot at scientific fame.

Yet Science Fictions is far from a counsel of despair. Rather, it’s a defense of the scientific method against the pressures and perverse incentives that lead scientists to bend the rules. By illustrating the many ways that scientists go wrong, Ritchie gives us the knowledge we need to spot dubious research and points the way to reforms that could make science trustworthy once again.

A Macmillan Audio production from Metropolitan Books

©2020 Stuart Ritchie (P)2020 Macmillan Audio

Reseñas de la Crítica

“A highly readable and competent description of the problems facing researchers in the 21st century... An excellent primer for anyone who wants to understand why and how science is failing to live up to its ideals.” —Wired

“An impressive achievement... A handy guide to what can go wrong in science, nicely blending eye-popping anecdotes with comprehensive studies.” —National Review

“Liberally documented with amazing stories... An uncompromising examination of the collision between the ideals of science and the realities of scientific publishing. Highly recommended for popular science readers curious about what lurks behind science headlines.” —Library Journal (starred review)

Fascinating book!

This is a wonderfully educational and entertaining book, delving into the world of science hoaxes, non-replicating studies, P-hacking, the Publish-or-Perish quagmire, and many other hair raising twists and turns involving the mistakes and perverse incentives of the science study world. I recommend this book to everyone who wants to be a better, wiser consumer of science studies as they are reported on NPR, the nightly news, and in the prestigious journals Science and Nature, the Lancet, the New England Journal, etc. Stuart Richie did a splendid job writing this book, and he reads it very nicely for the Audible Edition, in his lovely Scottish accent. I highly recommend it!

Eye opening

Heard about this on Mysterious Universe podcast so gave it a try. Great listen, author has clearly well researched the issue of fictional scientific reports and presents plausible ways to deter such occurrences. It was astounding to realize how much this happens and gave me a new lens of skepticism. However, if you're looking to justify refusing vaccines or a flat earth, that's not here. This author is striving to save scientific reports from falsehoods in order to combat exactly those extreme beliefs. Best non fiction book of 2020 for me.

thoughtful survey on currebt problems with science

A constructive critique of the current scientific practice of peer review. would generally recommend to people interested in the topic

Excellent Overview of the Issues of Modern Science

A great, thorough, and objectively-written explanation of all the problems plaguing science. Clearly written by someone who loves science and wants to improve it, rather than a disgruntled academic with an axe to grind or fringe conspiracy theorist.

Engaging and relevant throughout

Most books get lost in the weeds for large swaths of their 300 pages. This one is amusing and relevant throughout- I’m a data scientist and have caught myself being tempted by these issues even though it’s in my interest as a stockholder in my company to reveal the truth - not sway it to some tidy narrative

Sobering analysis of science by scientist.

Certainly makes a scientist, and hopefully all other fellow scientist think very carefully about what we incentivize.

Needed Now More Than Ever

People are putting so much faith today in science as being immutable; however it’s not and never has been. Think of earth is flat, bleeding people to heal them, and light travels on something called ether. Today is no different. It’s biased and often wrong. We all must dig into the research ourselves to understand how valid it might be. Most scientists are trying to do the right thing but that doesn’t mean they are coming up with the right answer. Couple that with a number of scientists who are biased because of who’s funding them, always be aware of what you read.

horrifying... and fascinating

baby scientist here. the opening chapters 100% gave me anxiety, but by the end I felt better equipped to approach my (and others') data

valuable lessons abt performance of modern science

Ritchie skillfully reads the audio version science fictions. It would be a great book for undergrad science students and perhaps recent grads of non-science degree programs. Young brains would benefit from the lessons in skepticism, incentives, and the scientific method. Although nothing Ritchie shares was shocking to me as a skeptical adult who enjoys learning of recent and misunderstood scientific studies (power posing & erroneously performed vaccine studies to name a few), the examples he shares provide valuable lessons about modern norms that lead to bad science.

Very Well Done But not sure of the Audience

Most of what Ritchie tells us is already well known in the science community, and the humanities people will not understand or misunderstand. The target is probably 1st year grad students and a few, very few, senior scientists who could head the call to action. I liked his ideas but it seems a bit tedious at this time.