Fluency

By: Jennifer Foehner Wells

Narrated by: Susanna Burney

Length: 10 hrs and 29 mins

Publisher's Summary

NASA discovered the alien ship lurking in the asteroid belt in the 1960's. They kept the Target under intense surveillance for decades, letting the public believe they were exploring the solar system, while they worked feverishly to refine the technology needed to reach it.

The ship itself remained silent, drifting.

Dr. Jane Holloway is content documenting nearly-extinct languages and had never contemplated becoming an astronaut. But when NASA recruits her to join a team of military scientists for an expedition to the Target, it's an adventure she can't refuse.

The ship isn't vacant, as they presumed.

A disembodied voice rumbles inside Jane's head, "You are home".

Jane fights the growing doubts of her colleagues as she attempts to decipher what the alien wants from her. As the derelict ship devolves into chaos and the crew gets cut off from their escape route, Jane must decide if she can trust the alien's help to survive.

©2014 Jennifer Foehner Wells (P)2014 Jennifer Foehner Wells

I "drug" myself away as quickly as possible.

This book wasn’t for you, but who do you think might enjoy it more?

Someone who knows little about SF and doesn't mind horrible grammar.

What was most disappointing about Jennifer Foehner Wells’s story?

The hero, Jane, is supposed to be a linguist. Apparently, Foehner doesn't know that linguistics is an analytical, structural science, not a savant talent. Jane is not a linguist; she is a polyglot. The concept is old: a linguist on a first-contact mission who translates and empathizes with the aliens. But in Foehner's novel, the alien AI communicates psychically--in English! So, a linguist--Jane--is useless; any other character could have filled the hero role. At one point, a character "drug his eyes away from" an instrument panel. I "drug" myself away from this novel by the end of chapter 4, and wish that Audible still allowed returns and refunds.

Did the narration match the pace of the story?

Yes.

You didn’t love this book... but did it have any redeeming qualities?

An old, but excellent concept. Many SF writers have used linguists for first contact and made the stories exciting. Perhaps Foehner should have read more of them, especially H. Beam Piper who investigated the possibilities of General Semantics for solving human-alien communication problems.

Any additional comments?

I won't be buying the sequels. How could other listeners think that this novel is 5 stars?

33 people found this helpful

Fluency is anything but fluent

I'm not the kind of person who will rate a book badly if I hate a character, find it too gory, or didn't like the ending. My sensibilities are not easily offended, and I understand not every book is for every person. However, I do rate books badly when they don't work. Fluency is a fine example of a book that does not work, for a number of reasons.

Do you remember the Hyperion series? I appreciated, but didn't love, Hyperion, because when it comes to sci-fi adventure novels, I'm in the "don’t tell me, show me" camp. Long, drawn out histories of peoples or characters I've never met and have no investment in? No. Just no. Give me space exploration, with some real-time and compelling action, maybe with some solid science as a foundation, and I'm good. Spend chapters spinning millennia of tragedy for random civilizations, and you're guaranteed to lose me.

Thus was the case in Fluency. The writing was off, the intensity fell flat, and the character development was charicaturish. There were back stories, but they were unbelievable and seemed to come from a 14-year-old's hero fantasies. And the telepathy-as-a-tool-for-telling-half-the-novel thing was B.O.R.I.N.G. It's hard to craft a compelling story when it's mostly one lonesome and whiny being revealing everything in one woman's mind. There were so many devices used in this book that didn't work, I can't and won't list them all.

Fair warning to those looking at the description: this is not hard science fiction. I live for good hard sci-fi, and this in NO WAY resembles it. I kept having to talk myself into returning to the book, and finally at halfway I remembered I have 200 books with actual potential waiting. Abandoning this meh of a novel was then a no brainer.

19 people found this helpful

Hindered by romance angle, entertaining though

When NASA’s secret small team of specialist experts reach the derelict alien BDO (Big Dumb Object) in Arthur C. Clarke’s “Rendezvous with Rama”, the reader got a fabulous tour of soaring wonder and possibility. When it happens here, we instead get the inner monologue of an adolescent girl-crush which is frequently interrupted by some space opera. There is a heavy dose of romance in this debut novel, and a lot of wish-fullfillment that makes far too much of the plot predictable as our protagonist, expert (and civilian) linguist Dr. Jane Holloway, overcomes a series of challenges that stem from the less capable (and military) men that accompany her. I found parallels with Gary Gibson’s “Stealing Light", which also features a heroine in psychic possession of an alien derelict starship, as well as James Cameron’s “Aliens”, which had similar survival-horror action scenes. Here in “Fluency”, Jane is too consistently successful for the dramatic tension to build sufficiently, and the other characters seem accessory. The pacing is greatly improved by a second flashback narrative alternating with the main one, providing both exposition into the mission as well as depth for the character. I felt like the opportunity was missed to create a wildly alien culture, finding instead a slightly varied flavor of humanoid Star Trek style beings, although a wider field of cosmic players is alluded to. Foehner Wells’ forthcoming follow-up novel, “Remanence”, will hopefully delve into these more imaginative possibilities, and downplay or even forego the romance altogether.

23 people found this helpful

Great Concept, Loved the Story... I Want More!

I went into this book already loving the concept of the story. I was pleasantly surprised that even though I thought I knew where the story would go, but there were plenty of twists, turns, and surprises in store.

Summary with very, very minor spoilers (How else can I describe the storyline):

The book focuses around a female linguist with extensive experience in field and emergency situations (although she tries to suppress those life experiences). As an expert in the field of languages and communication, a former leader of a team in a first-contact situation with an isolated human tribe, and possessing a demonstrated ability to manage stress and react to emergencies, she is the first candidate chosen by NASA for a top secret mission.

As part of the story, it is revealed that the Roswell crash was actually a shuttle from a much larger ship located in the asteroid belt. The huge ship has been seemingly abandoned for decades, now floating dead in space. After recently discovering that a comet is on a direct path for the ship, NASA sends a mission to the ship before the comet can destroy it. The mission is meant to be the first of two. The first is to survey what is there and report back so that the second mission will be prepared. The main character is along to take charge in the event of a first contact situation with anyone still left on the ship.
After arrival, a single survivor makes contact with our linguist... in a rather unconventional way. We also come to find that the entire crew was killed by some kind of bio-weapon. Only the navigator, a somewhat different being than the rest of the aliens, survived alone for the past several decades.
Without giving too much of the storyline away, we also eventually learn that the aliens in question are members of a coalition of intelligent life that are united against a single threat, and had originally visited earth in search of allies.
The book did end, as I expected, with a cliffhanger... It is definitely set up for another book to follow. Although I am always irritated when there is more story to be told past the end of a book, but it will make me look forward to the next one (PLEASE let there be a next one!).
As I said, I went through the book thinking I knew what was around the next turn, only to be gladly proven wrong.

The narrator does a pretty good job as well. While isn't the best narrator ever, the narration felt believable enough for a 5-star rating, although I probably would have given a 4.5 if possible.

I think that there were a few issues in writing style and execution in a few small places, but I loved the rest of the book so much that I couldn't warrant giving anything less than 5 stars. I almost couldn't stop listening, and that's what I want in an audiobook.

41 people found this helpful

We ran out of good astronauts?

You are told that your fellow astronauts are in imminent danger and that you need to act immediately. What do you do? Continue to talk and waste time....unacceptable. I can forgive the occasional blunder. Surely the others act professionally and intelligently - right? More like sending a team of high school kids into space.

2 people found this helpful

This is barely sci-fi.

First up, I liked the narrator. Good work, good voice.
Spoilers ahead.

The story, however, I found really annoying. Poorly researched. Irrational and petty characters. Throw in a few cliches. Tech introduced merely as a story convenience rather than with any coherent planning. I wanted to see them all die in an explosion, but unfortunately I missed out.

This is a romance, mills and boon, bodice ripper, that happens to be set in space. But only 1 sex scene.

This is a story of trained astronauts who break rules and act like dicks. And then get infected with a virus that makes them act like dicks.

This is a race with scheming enemies who use nanotechnology to kill. But they only program their sneaky bots to kill 1/2 the species on board ship.

It's okay if you suspend disbelief and don't think too hard I suppose. This story just annoys me.

15 people found this helpful

Space Erotica

If I had only known that this was a space romance.

The soldier is a stereotype. The engineer is horny. The doctor had no depth. And to top it off, the main character acts like a lovesick girl who can't remember that she's in danger and has been betrayed.

I simply can't finish this.

4 people found this helpful

good, solid premise, female main character.

Not an entirely original premise, but very well done regardless. The female main character brings a nice change of perspective to the genre, without losing anything.

Looking forward to the next book in the series.

1 person found this helpful

dissapointing

What did you like best about Fluency? What did you like least?

I liked the concept of it. First contact and how we would approach it.
But it was all sci fi and no thought provoking ideas or concepts. fell flat on its face. I caught myself drifting else where in thought and had to re listen to sections because i wouldnt truly listen

Could you see Fluency being made into a movie or a TV series? Who should the stars be?

cheesy SCI FI channel movie. yes. Where the protagonist is played by a 3rd class actor and david hasseloff!

1 person found this helpful

Bad romance, poor sci-fi

This slow paced space romance is one awkward situation after the other. The sci-fi elements had potential; but the focus on the 40 year old virgin stalking the "sexy" but "frumpy" teacher kept distracting the author. I found myself saying "oh come on!" And "let's move this along" aloud far too often.

1 person found this helpful

Writing Feels Immature

I felt slightly bothered by the story through out. I had the feeling I was reading a story written by a bright high school student rather than that of an adult.

The male characters were particularly badly written. One character is clearly meant to be genius bad boy and so constantly thinks about six and acts dumb when it comes to understanding relationships but then is written to have thoughts and feelings that are totally at odds with his established character such as reading to the body language between two people and noticing exact shades of cosmetics. It seems unlikely to me that the two would coexist and it seems more likely that he's simply ended up being written as internally as a rude, sec obsessed lesbian because the author really doesn't understand men.

The technology also has a distinct feeling of sci-fi magic. The book even makes reference to the "Clarke quote" about "any sufficiently advanced technology..." but it feels abused here to simply explain away any inconvenient plot problems.

Overall these problems spoilt a story that was never all that interesting anyway. The ending is meant to be a cliff hangar but I'm profoundly uninterested in what may come next in any case and don't think I'll be listening to any further books in this series.

3 people found this helpful

Good Space Adventure

Page turner type fast developing "near future" action. A women as the hero with that issue being well developed in current context. Great storytelling. Can't wait for sequel.

2 people found this helpful

Didn't really like it

I found the characters reaction to their situation a little outlandish. Embodies some of the worst tropes in science fiction today.

1 person found this helpful

Fast moving and refreshing.

I chose this title on a bit of a whim being both an unfamiliar author and narrator but I'm pleased I did. In some ways it's good old science fiction exploring a seemingly dead space hulk when sudden emergencies crop up, inimicable life forms appear and there's a good guy around but can they be trusted. The story moves on progressively and I looked forward to getting back to it each day. It was well read with good diction and performed believably. I look forward to a sequel.

1 person found this helpful

A bit simplistic

The story while interesting and engaging was a bit simplistic at times the writer more interested in gender role reversal than the science fiction story it should have been. It felt smug.

3 people found this helpful

Unexpected entertainment

What made the experience of listening to Fluency the most enjoyable?

My first impression on listening was it’s a young adult book as the story unfolded it was more than that, although it unfolded with a slight predictability

Which character – as performed by Susanna Burney – was your favourite?

Jane Holloway

1 person found this helpful

Wow, I love d every minute of this.

Great story, good cast of characters and very enjoyable. I look forward to the sexual.

Hmmm not sure about this one

Not bad enough to return I'm half tempted to get the next in the series.. Kept me interested just, but mostly another one of those people act unprofessional (when they are professionals) and argue and fight and then the book ends...

Having said that if it was totally junk it would have one back, in slightly interested to see where the story goes.. The next in series is on my wish list maybe try it another day