In this episode of The Wrong Ones, I'm returning after a week away—traveling to another continent, and choosing not to record until I could show up fully present. What begins as a travel recap slowly unfolds into a psychological reflection on autonomy, gratitude, and the dissonance of craving things we intellectually know won't fulfill us.

This isn't a conversation about rejecting luxury. It's a conversation about orientation. About the internal friction that occurs when desire attaches itself to identity instead of preference—and why wanting something doesn't always mean it aligns with you.

We explore the psychology of anticipation versus ownership, why dopamine spikes fade faster than meaning, and how external accumulation can quietly become a substitute for internal certainty. From there, the episode moves into relationships and emotional timing, using a moment from Real Housewives of Beverly Hills—Kyle Richards and Mauricio revisiting their former family home—as a lens into how lifestyle expansion, nostalgia, and identity shifts can influence connection long before separation becomes official.

What happens when growth outpaces emotional integration? When expansion is visible, but alignment is not?

This episode looks at subconscious conditioning around worth and success, the subtle ways comparison operates beneath awareness, and the tension between ambition and peace. We examine why simplicity can feel grounding even when ambition remains present, and how fulfillment often emerges not from detachment, but from awareness.

Ultimately, this conversation is about recalibration—not restraint. About wanting things without being ruled by them. About recognizing that fulfillment isn't found in accumulation, but in the quiet practice of internal steadiness while life is still unfolding.

This episode is for anyone who:

• Feels conflicted between ambition and contentment

• Knows material things don't equal happiness, yet still feels pulled toward them

• Notices nostalgia surface during periods of growth

• Finds clarity arriving only after emotional distance

• Questions whether expansion is always synonymous with alignment

• Is learning the difference between liking something and needing it

Instead of asking what you want next, ask yourself:

When do I feel most like myself—not most impressive, but most internally settled?

What desires feel expansive, and which feel compensatory?

Where have I confused stimulation with fulfillment?

What would it look like to grow without postponing peace?

Resources & Concepts Mentioned:

• Hedonic Adaptation & Dopamine Anticipation

• Cognitive Dissonance in Desire

• Lifestyle Expansion & Emotional Timing in Relationships

• Symbolic Self-Completion Theory

• Admiration vs. Envy

• Nostalgia & Memory Encoding

• Emotional Return on Investment

• Arrival Syndrome

• Internal Congruence & Identity Flexibility

• Ambition vs. Peace

• Grief & Gratitude Coexisting

• Closure vs. Integration

-----

As always: if you're enjoying the show, please take a moment to follow, rate, and subscribe — it truly helps us grow and reach more listeners.

A reflection on accuracy, attachment, and the quiet relief of finally trusting yourself.

In this episode of The Wrong Ones, I'm unpacking a moment that caught me off guard during a trip to Sedona—a birth chart reading that wasn't emotional because it was mystical, but because it was precise.

This isn't an astrology episode. It's a conversation about what happens psychologically when someone reflects your internal world back to you with clarity—and why that experience can feel overwhelming, grounding, and even grief-inducing if you've spent years in relationships marked by emotional ambiguity.

What happens when being accurately seen feels unfamiliar? When your body responds before your mind can explain why? This episode explores why accuracy regulates the nervous system, why misattunement quietly erodes self-trust, and how chronic relational confusion trains us to doubt our own internal data.

From there, we move into the neuroscience of attachment and meaning-making after heartbreak. We talk about how relationships shape identity, why clarity often arrives after a bond ends, and why the brain reaches for mirrors—therapy, symbolism, narrative frameworks—when attachment systems dissolve. Not because we're searching for answers, but because the nervous system needs coherence.

This episode reframes astrology as a mirror rather than a belief system, exploring how language and pattern-naming help integrate experiences that once felt amorphous. We examine the difference between insight and embodied trust, why knowing your patterns doesn't automatically free you from them, and what actually changes when self-trust moves out of the mind and into the body.

Ultimately, this conversation is about orientation—not revelation. About the quiet moment when confusion lifts, not because someone explained everything, but because your internal experience finally aligned with reality.

This episode is for anyone who:

• Has felt emotionally unseen without being overtly mistreated

• Struggles to trust their own intuition in relationships

• Confuses familiarity with safety

• Finds clarity after a breakup both relieving and destabilizing

• Is learning the difference between understanding patterns and changing them

Because being seen doesn't always feel comforting. Sometimes it feels like grief—for how long you went without it.

Instead of asking why a relationship didn't work, ask yourself:

When was the last time I felt accurately seen—not admired or chosen, but understood?

What clarity have I already received that I'm still negotiating with?

Where have I been managing ambiguity instead of requiring consistency?

What would change if I trusted the information my body has been giving me all along?

• Attachment Theory & Emotional Attunement

• Nervous System Regulation & Coherence

• Misattunement vs. Emotional Abuse

• Meaning-Making After Heartbreak

• Identity Disruption & Narrative Integration

• Astrology as a Reflective Framework (Not Doctrine)

• Insight vs. Embodied Self-Trust

• Familiarity vs. Safety in Partner Selection

• Post-Attachment Clarity

• Integration vs. Intellectual Understanding

-----

As always: if you're enjoying the show, please take a moment to follow, rate, and subscribe — it truly helps us grow and reach more listeners.

In this episode of The Wrong Ones, I'm unpacking something that started as a harmless social-media trend—looking back at 2016 photos—and turned into a much deeper conversation about identity, body image, and the psychology of our first real heartbreak.

What happens when old photos don't feel nostalgic, but activating? When past versions of yourself bring up discomfort instead of pride? This episode explores why that reaction isn't about vanity or embarrassment, but about unresolved grief, body memory, and identity shifts that haven't fully integrated yet.

From there, we move into the anatomy of a first adult breakup—the kind that doesn't end with betrayal or blame, just the quiet devastation of "something feels missing." I talk through a relationship from my early Boston years, the suddenness of that ending, and why ambiguous breakups are often the hardest to heal from. We explore why the urge to understand why becomes so consuming, why answers rarely bring the relief we think they will, and how attachment systems respond when certainty disappears.

This episode is a psychology-forward deep dive into meaning-seeking after heartbreak, the illusion of closure, and the realization that someone's explanation doesn't actually change the outcome of their decision. We talk about family introductions, cultural narratives around seriousness, the impulse to "teach someone a lesson" after they leave, and why emotional clarity can quietly become a way of staying attached.

Ultimately, this conversation is about integration—how grief softens over time, how writing and reflection help the nervous system complete what the mind can't, and how healing doesn't come from understanding everything, but from no longer needing to.

This episode is for anyone who:

• Struggles to look at old versions of themselves without judgment

• Has replayed a breakup trying to make it make sense

• Confuses explanation with closure

• Is learning how to let meaning exist without answers

Because healing doesn't always look like clarity. Sometimes it looks like peace without the story.

Resources & Concepts Mentioned:

Ambiguous Loss & Unfinished Grief

Attachment Theory (Anxious vs. Avoidant Dynamics)

Nervous System Regulation & State-Dependent Memory

Identity Formation & Ego Dissolution

Meaning-Seeking as a Control Strategy

Closure vs. Completion

Emotional Labor & Moral Accounting in Relationships

Integration vs. Resolution

Body Memory & Self-Compassion Across Life Stages

-----

As always: if you're enjoying the show, please take a moment to follow, rate, and subscribe — it truly helps us grow and reach more listeners.

A real-time catch-up about nervous-system safety, a Phoenix meet-cute that cracked something open, and what changes when you stop living from lack.

In this episode of The Wrong Ones, I'm doing something a little different. Instead of a fully scripted conversation, I'm letting this one unfold the way life has been unfolding lately—messy, surprising, and honestly kind of beautiful. It's part storytime, part reflection, and part psychological deep-dive into the quiet internal shift that happens when you stop orienting your life around what's missing and start inhabiting what's already here.

We start with the holidays back on the East Coast—family, old rhythms, that subtle kind of emotional grounding—and then move into New Year's Eve in Sedona with lifelong friends. A night that wasn't flashy or performative, but deeply regulating. No pressure to reinvent. No "new year, new me" energy. Just safety. The kind that settles your body, not just your mind.

And then there's Phoenix. A chaotic travel day, a Starbucks that turns into a meet-cute, and a conversation that becomes unexpectedly intimate—fast. Not because it was meant to be "the one," but because it showed me something: how different connection feels when your nervous system isn't in a state of lack. When chemistry doesn't hijack you. When you can enjoy something without trying to turn it into a future.

From there, we get into what's shifted beneath the surface—how fulfillment changes attraction patterns, why urgency gets mistaken for alignment, and how "trust the timing" can sometimes become a spiritual-sounding way to bypass real grief. Because timing isn't something that happens to you—it's something that emerges when your internal state and your external choices finally match.

This episode is for anyone who feels like they're "waiting" for love to start their life, anyone who's tired of confusing intensity with depth, and anyone learning how to hold desire without letting it dominate them. Because your life isn't a waiting room. It's happening right now.

Reflection Prompt of the Episode:

Where are you treating your life like it starts later—and what would change if you started living as if it's already yours?

What are you still measuring against an imaginary timeline?

What would it look like to hold desire without urgency—without turning every connection into a test or a sign?

Resources & Concepts Mentioned:

Nervous System Regulation & Felt Safety

Attachment Patterns (Anxious vs. Secure Dynamics)

Chemistry vs. Activation (Anxiety mistaken for attraction)

Emotional Outsourcing & Co-Regulation

Identity Foreclosure (Premature commitment to an identity/path)

Intensity vs. Depth (why urgency feels like meaning)

Spiritual Bypassing ("trust the timing" without context)

Agency vs. Passive Waiting (alignment as a choice)

Discernment & Self-Trust (walking away from what costs peace)

Fulfillment as a foundation for healthier attraction

-----

As always: if you're enjoying the show, please take a moment to follow, rate, and subscribe — it truly helps us grow and reach more listeners.

A New Year conversation about self-investment, self-trust, and why alignment—not being chosen—changes everything.

In this first episode of the new year, The Wrong Ones opens with a recalibration rather than a reinvention. This is not a "new year, new me" episode. It's a grounded, psychology-forward exploration of what it actually means to choose yourself—consistently, holistically, and without turning self-care into performance.

This episode unpacks one of the most misunderstood dynamics in modern dating: why emotionally healthy men tend to deeply value women who take care of themselves—not because of aesthetics or "high value" branding, but because self-investment signals self-regard, stability, competence, and agency at a nervous-system level. We move beyond surface-level advice to examine how physical, mental, emotional, and financial self-care fundamentally shift relational power dynamics, attachment patterns, and partner selection.

Through psychology-backed insight and long-form reflection, this conversation reframes self-care as self-leadership. We explore how choosing yourself changes what you tolerate, who you attract, and how you move through relationships without abandoning your identity. The episode closes with a prompt to enter the year focused not on becoming more desirable—but more devoted to yourself.

This episode is for anyone who's done chasing potential, confusing anxiety with chemistry, or shrinking to be chosen—and is ready to build a life where alignment, not performance, sets the tone.

Reflection Prompt of the Episode:

Where are you outsourcing your worth—and what would change if you became the primary investment in your own life this year?

-----

As always: if you're enjoying the show, please take a moment to follow, rate, and subscribe — it truly helps us grow and reach more listeners.

What I created, moved through, and survived—and why none of it was for nothing.

In this episode of The Wrong Ones, we reflect on the year not through milestones or achievements, but through what was metabolized—emotionally, psychologically, and neurologically. Recorded during that tender in-between stretch as Hanukkah comes to a close and the holidays begin, this conversation explores what it actually means to say "nothing in life is ever wasted"—not as a platitude, but as neuroscience.

Inspired by a recent conversation with peers, this episode looks at how even the years that feel messy, unresolved, or painful don't disappear. They integrate. Through personal storytelling and psychology-backed insight, we unpack how the nervous system records experience, how meaning forms after survival, and how reflection changes not just how we remember the past—but how we carry it forward.

This episode is for anyone ending the year feeling changed, but not finished. For anyone who survived something quietly. And for anyone who wants to honor what they created, moved through, and survived—without forcing closure.

• Why experiences don't vanish psychologically—they either integrate or repeat

• Hebb's Law ("neurons that fire together wire together") and how emotional patterns form

• The role of the amygdala and hippocampus in emotional memory and heartbreak

• Polyvagal Theory and why the body often senses loss before the mind does

• Anticipatory grief and the nervous system's early warning system

• Attachment theory and why honesty in relationships can feel neurologically threatening

• Self-determination theory and autonomy as a core psychological need

• Why survival mode still counts—and why meaning doesn't always arrive in real time

• Viktor Frankl and the difference between performing meaning and integrating it

• Post-traumatic growth and how reflection reshapes experience

• Expressive writing research and why turning pain into language is regulating

• Memory reconsolidation and how reflection changes emotional memory

• Narrative identity and the stories we tell ourselves about our lives

• Distress tolerance, restraint, and emotional maturity

• Emotional complexity: holding grief and gratitude at the same time

• Integration vs. closure—and why the goal isn't "moving on," but moving forward intact

• Hebb's Law & Neural Wiring (experience shaping the brain)

• Emotional Memory: Amygdala & Hippocampus

• Polyvagal Theory (Porges; nervous system safety & threat detection)

• Anticipatory Grief (pre-loss nervous system processing)

• Attachment Theory (Bowlby & Ainsworth; relational threat & needs)

• Self-Determination Theory (autonomy, alignment, psychological health)

• Viktor Frankl & Meaning-Making After Suffering

• Post-Traumatic Growth (Tedeschi & Calhoun)

• Expressive Writing Research (Pennebaker)

• Memory Reconsolidation (Nader; remembering as rewriting)

• Narrative Identity (McAdams; identity as story)

• Distress Tolerance (DBT; emotional regulation without self-abandonment)

• Emotional Complexity & Psychological Resilience

-----

As always: if you're enjoying the show, please take a moment to follow, rate, and subscribe — it truly helps us grow and reach more listeners.

In this episode of The Wrong Ones, we talk about the quiet, internal moment when your relationship worldview widens—not because you've suddenly changed who you are, but because you've finally grown into someone who can hold more nuance. From matching with a trans man on a dating app to noticing how your thirties shift your sense of "never" and "always," we explore what happens when the lens you've used to understand love moves from portrait mode to landscape.

Through personal storytelling and psychology-backed insight, we unpack how evolving relationship structures, therapy culture, technology, and simple lived experience stretch the edges of what feels possible. We talk about why curiosity doesn't threaten your identity, how exposure softens rigidity, and what it means to move from inherited scripts to consciously chosen beliefs. Plus, a little life update on launching Substack and returning to writing as another space to process all of this in real time.

In this episode, we cover:

• The "soft clicks": tiny, ordinary moments that reveal big internal shifts

• How your thirties change your brain, your identity, and your tolerance for nuance

• Matching with a trans man on a dating app and what that pause of curiosity actually meant

• The difference between expanding your worldview and changing your orientation or desires

• Moving from black-and-white thinking to "Does this feel aligned for me?"

• Differentiation: becoming your own person outside of family, culture, and inherited rules

• How therapy language (attachment, boundaries, nervous system) reshapes relationship expectations

• The role of dating apps in norm-shifting and repeated exposure to diverse identities and structures

• Why monogamy isn't disappearing—just becoming a conscious choice instead of a default

• Psychological flexibility: holding more options in mind without feeling destabilized

• The emotional exhaustion of performing timelines that were never really yours

• Designing relationships that fit your nervous system, not just your résumé

• Curiosity vs. participation: understanding something without needing to live it

• How growing older is less about certainty and more about internal spaciousness

Reflection Question of the Week:

Where in your life are you being invited to loosen an old belief—not to change who you are, but to see who you've become?

Resources Mentioned:

• Differentiation and Family Systems Theory (Bowen; self vs. system)

• Post-Formal Thought & Integrative Complexity (adult cognitive development and nuance)

• Schema Theory & Accommodation (Piaget; updating internal narratives)

• Psychological Flexibility (Hayes; Acceptance & Commitment Therapy)

• Mere Exposure Effect & Norm-Shifting Through Contact (Zajonc; familiarity reducing threat)

• Attachment Theory (Bowlby & Ainsworth; internal working models in relationships)

• Polyvagal-Informed Ideas of Safety & Regulation (Porges; nervous system and connection)

• Therapy Culture & Relational Self-Awareness (contemporary psychology and modern love)

-----

As always: if you're enjoying the show, please take a moment to follow, rate, and subscribe — it truly helps us grow and reach more listeners.