Against Empathy

The Case for Rational Compassion

De: Paul Bloom

Narrado por: Karen Cass

Duración: 7 h y 30 m

Resumen del Editor

A controversial call to arms, Against Empathy argues that the natural impulse to share the feelings of others can lead to immoral choices in both public policy and in our intimate relationships with friends and family.

Most people, including many policy makers, activists, scientists, and philosophers, have encouraged us to be more empathetic - to feel the pain and pleasure of others. Yale researcher and author Paul Bloom argues that this is a mistake. Far from leading us to improve the lives of others, empathy is a capricious and irrational emotion that appeals to our narrow prejudices. It muddles our judgment and often leads to cruelty. We are at our best when we are smart enough not to rely on it and draw upon a more distanced compassion.

Based on groundbreaking scientific findings, Against Empathy makes the case that some of the worst decisions that individuals and nations make - who to give money to, when to go to war, how to respond to climate change, and who to put in prison - are too often motivated by honest yet misplaced emotions. With clear and witty prose, Bloom demonstrates how empathy distorts our judgment in every aspect of our lives, from philanthropy and charity to the justice system; from culture and education to foreign policy and war. Without empathy, Bloom insists, our decisions would be clearer, fairer, and ultimately more moral.

Bound to be controversial, Against Empathy shows us that when it comes to major policy decisions and the choices we make in our everyday lives, limiting our empathetic emotions is often the most compassionate choice we can make.

©2016 Paul Bloom (P)2016 HarperCollins Publishers

Good Concept, Well, but not Rigorously, Executed

What did you love best about Against Empathy?

The concept is interesting and well cashed out with experimental results. Bloom provides good reasons to think empathy isn’t always useful (and is usually not useful).

How would you have changed the story to make it more enjoyable?

Bloom is not a philosopher and his philosophical arguments are weak in many spots.

Insightful, Helpful, and Fun

Against Empathy and Pro Rationality. He covers a lot of ground: from politics to ethics to group and interpersonal relationships. A solid alignment with cognitive psychology books like Thinking, Fast and Slow and Drive.

Nothing You Haven't Considered

I wasn't expecting revelation, but I had hoped for interesting. I think my teenager my enjoy it, but in a 10 min Ted Talk form.

will make you reconsider your mental models

Paul Bloom's attention to detail in constructing his argument is careful and persuasive. For review, listen to his podcast with Sam Harris.

Provocative, witty and persuasive

This is a pleasure to listen to. He took detailed content about psychological theory and research and presented it in an accessible way. I did not think I would be so interested in this topic but the writing and argumentation made it very interesting.

read and learn. dont revel in your ignorance.

then try sam harris. stop being partisan and become a rational being. thank you paul bloom!

Great perspective worth hearing

It was a great perspective that I will continue thinking about and discussing with friends.

Not As Radical As It Sounds But Great Read

The Title is a bit of click bait but the book is engaging until even the final few minutes. Bloom doesn’t ‘debunk’ empathy but rather puts our understanding of empathy in the broader context of academic findings, leading to a more nuanced way to interpreting what does (and does not) make empathy matter

Very accessible (almost no jargon) without having to water down the science

Expose of ideological error, but not perfect

Highly recommend. Bloom does yeoman's work in a core principle that underlies much law and dramatic narrative.

It would be even better if he did not accept political factions as an immutable given. After all, he is shaking their foundations.

His advocacy, and compelling examples, of rational thinking is heartening in the current climate of postmodern dominance.

Great book, not so great narration

A highly recommended book for everyone.
It's only too bad that it sounds like Siri is narrating it.