Strong Motion

De: Jonathan Franzen

Narrado por: Scott Aiello

Louis Holland arrives in Boston in a spring of ecological upheaval (a rash of earthquakes on the North Shore) and odd luck: the first one kills his grandmother. Louis tries to maintain his independence, but falls in love with a Harvard seismologist whose discoveries about the earthquakes' cause complicate everything.

©1992 Jonathan Franzen (P)2013 Audible, Inc.

Compelling Story, Ridiculous Narrator

What did you like best about Strong Motion? What did you like least?

This one was a little slow starting for me because all the characters are jerks, but once the earthquakes started, I was hooked.

Who was your favorite character and why?

I particularly liked the character of Rene, who humanizes Louis and makes me like him more.

How did the narrator detract from the book?

The audiobook narrator, however, I did not enjoy. First of all, apparently he thinks the best way to convey a female voice is to become grating, nasal, and lispy. Some of the female characters sounded like Beavis and Butthead. Seriously. Bad.What's more, the narrator constantly mispronounces things, from words like "hegemony" to place names. I can almost forgive the place names, as we here in Massachusetts do pronounce things in unlikely ways, but the actual words, those are less forgivable. But back to the place names, why would the publisher hire someone to read a book about metro Boston who clearly has no idea about greater Boston? Among the place names mispronounced here: Worcester, Waltham, Peabody, and Copley Square. How hard is it to pronounce Copley Square? What I'm saying is, this narrator did not do his homework.

Was Strong Motion worth the listening time?

I'm lukewarm on this one. It's a good story, but I often had to cringe and grit my teeth through the narration.

Pepples in a pond

A good writer tosses many pepples in a pond in such a way the ripples from all interact and bounce off each other in an entrancing experience that suspends our disbelief and disengages our self conscious suspicions. And also, who occasionally find a larger, round and beautiful stone to hurl into the pond with a SPLASH!!

Easily as good as "The Corrections"

What made the experience of listening to Strong Motion the most enjoyable?

It's an outstanding story, with great character development and an ability to at least explain both sides of several social issues dealt with in a rational and well thought out manner (though the author's actual stance on any such issue is never left to the imagination).

What other book might you compare Strong Motion to and why?

Any of Franzen's other novels. It's what he does.

What about Scott Aiello’s performance did you like?

His ability to show the proper emotion at the proper times.

Was this a book you wanted to listen to all in one sitting?

Well no, but only because it was over 20 hours.

Any additional comments?

If you liked "The Corrections" give this one a try.

Prepare to suspend your disbelief.

What did you like best about Strong Motion? What did you like least?

I liked the unraveling of the background story with the various members of the family (past and present).

Who was your favorite character and why?

Louis. I really did not enter the thinking of the others. Franzen's writing has a satirical quality that never really lets you sympathize completely with his characters.

Would you be willing to try another one of Scott Aiello’s performances?

I think his performance was the weakest part of the experience of listening to this book. The sister, who is graduating with a Harvard MBA is made to sound like an insecure, dumb teenager. He mispronounces many of the place names, which is unfortunate. Peabody is pronounced "PEA-buddy" not pea-BODY. Somehow he gets "Nahant" right. The first half of the book is read with a snarky, sardonic tone and he calms down later in the book..

Could you see Strong Motion being made into a movie or a TV series? Who should the stars be?

.Not really. I think it would end up feeling like a remake of "A Civil Action"

Any additional comments?

I enjoy JF's books. I expect them to be long and complex. I thought the whole anti-abortion side story did not add anything to this story. I'm not sure what it had to do with the plot. I did learn about earthquakes and seismology, which I did not expect. The best part of the book was the father talking about his political beliefs. I wish the father had been a much more visible and vocal contributor to the plot. He had some really great insights.

Clearly Franzen, but with plot

This was a great novel, which certainly follows the Franzen formula evident in his other books, with a few notable differences.

1. Most of the story is told from one point of view where most of his works switch fairly often.
2. The story has a pretty linear AND chronological plot - which is another clear departure.

If you liked The Corrections or Freedom you are sure to like this one as well, but I have to admit I enjoyed Freedom far more than this book just due to the subject matter.. Seismology and highly intelligent academics ( a big part of this book) are not in my realm of concern where music and politics are (which are a big part of freedom)..

The narrator does a great job with the material, and can hear a small chuckle in his voice during some of the funniest parts of this book (although dark)