Spying on the South

An Odyssey Across the American Divide

By: Tony Horwitz

Narrated by: Mark Deakins, Tony Horwitz

The New York Times-bestselling final book by the beloved, Pulitzer-Prize winning historian Tony Horwitz.

With Spying on the South, the best-selling author of Confederates in the Attic returns to the South and the Civil War era for an epic adventure on the trail of America's greatest landscape architect. In the 1850s, the young Frederick Law Olmsted was adrift, a restless farmer and dreamer in search of a mission. He found it during an extraordinary journey, as an undercover correspondent in the South for the up-and-coming New York Times.

For the Connecticut Yankee, pen name "Yeoman," the South was alien, often hostile territory. Yet Olmsted traveled for 14 months, by horseback, steamboat, and stagecoach, seeking dialogue and common ground. His vivid dispatches about the lives and beliefs of Southerners were revelatory for readers of his day, and Yeoman's remarkable trek also reshaped the American landscape, as Olmsted sought to reform his own society by creating democratic spaces for the uplift of all. The result: Central Park and Olmsted's career as America's first and foremost landscape architect.

Tony Horwitz rediscovers Yeoman Olmsted amidst the discord and polarization of our own time. Is America still one country? In search of answers, and his own adventures, Horwitz follows Olmsted's tracks and often his mode of transport (including muleback): through Appalachia, down the Mississippi River, into bayou Louisiana, and across Texas to the contested Mexican borderland. Venturing far off beaten paths, Horwitz uncovers bracing vestiges and strange new mutations of the Cotton Kingdom. Horwitz's intrepid and often hilarious journey through an outsized American landscape is a masterpiece in the tradition of Great Plains, Bad Land, and the author's own classic, Confederates in the Attic.

Insightful

I found this book, very interesting in drawing parallels in unchanged attitudes and beliefs over the past 160 years

I wish I could thank Tony Horwitz

In this book book the late Pulitzer Prize winning author Tony Horwitz interweaves firsthand observances of the antebellum South by famed landscape architect Frederick Olmsted with his own astute and often humorous observations on the same locales Olmsted visited. The narrator speaks clearly and varies his voice and accent just enough to help you keep track of who is speaking. Although the book is on the long side, it kept my interest from beginning to end. I learned a lot and was entertained. I feel saddened by Horwitz’s death. If he were still alive I would write him a word of thanks.

Lovely finale for intrepid journalist/historian

All such works - retracing the steps of a traveler-journalist and, a decade after his long trek, celebrated landscape architect Frederick Law Olmsted, and trying to make sense of the people and places he encounters - result in long sequences of, essentially, anecdotes, from which the author/traveler/investigator seeks to draw larger generalizations. The story of Olmsted's mounting animosity toward slavery runs through Horwitz's narrative, as does the author's indefatigable curiosity about "what makes things tick here?" and "who might I talk to that will help me understand?" Horwitz's generous treatment of a region that, to many, has been on the wrong side of history since 1619, or 1787, makes familiar sense of the state's, cities, and towns he passes through: with some exceptions, conservative, individualistic, religious, tribal, history-minded. Mining Olmsted's trilogy that comprises his The Cotton Kingdom enables Horwitz to resurrect history that few nonspecialists who read this book will have known about - for example, the antebellum experience of German 1848ers in Texan exile - and will send readers running back to the original texts. Horwitz does an excellent job following up on such stories and, where possible, bringing them up to date. He's also strong on detailing the horrors of slavery and the wrongs of Jim Crow. He draws unsurprising conclusions about political tribalism that is nearly analogous to the great national divide in the run-up to civil war. He is, however, generous to a near fault in writing about people with whom he disagrees. Horwitz concludes his trip by spending two days in Olmsted's greatest and best known work, NYC's Central Park, a monument to the artist's thoughts on Democracy as well as our first "park," to which the author adds a paean to beautiful open spaces and their place in our history. Tony Horwitz's untimely death, at age 60, in late May 2019, while touring this book, deprives us of an essential observer, commentator, and author.

Another superb look at life!

I adore Tony Horwitz's writing! If I ever leave my husband, it will be to run off with Tony for a ramble through history and the world we inhabit! Every one of his books seems to be his best . . . and remains so the second or third time around. He's one of our greatest contemporary writers. Should be required reading before one is allowed to register to vote!

RIP Tony Horwitz

Another excellent book by Mr. Horwitz. His humor and keen insights will be greatly missed.

Great final story from a talented author

Tony Horwitz was at his best when he blended history and journalism to tell us of our country’s past and present. He excels at in his final journey: “Spying on the South,” which was published just weeks before his death. The book is a mix of history lesson and travelogue as Horwitz follows in the path of landscape architect Fredrick Law Olmsted’s journeys through antebellum south. Each chapter includes part of Olmsted’s trip followed by Horwitz’ 21st-century journalism. There are plenty of interesting characters he meets across the south, particularly in Texas, which accounts for the second half of the book.

I am sad this is Horwitz’ final journey but think it was a fitting finale for the talented author. I thought the narrator did a great job of capturing Horwitz' personality during the first-person travelogue accounts.

It's All My Fault

I decided some months ago to read up on the intelligence community; that sector responsible for gathering actionable information for various clients. For example, the alphabet people like CIA, DOD, FBI, MI6, NSA - sometimes their work is called "Spying". My first mistake was thinking this book had anything to do with spying or official intelligence gathering. It does not. It is a story of a contemporary writer who wants to retrace the routes of an antebellum character through the southern US. The reader therefore moves back and forth between the mid-19th century and the 21st century. Fair enough. Could be good. But it's not.

The primary reason the book becomes a slog is because the author visits and reports on the least interesting places, not only in America but perhaps on the planet; worn out, tired out, fizzled out, abandoned, broken, isolated, depopulated, poor, addled, uneducated, overlooked, desperate and nearing hopelessness. My second mistake was expecting the author's Grandma had given him the same stern advice my Grandma gave me, "Never criticize someone else's house when they invite you to visit and compliment their cooking if they feed you."

I feel like I took an excessively long trip with a spoiled teenager who complained the whole way about e v e r y t h i n g and was just one paragraph away from writing, "....clinging to their guns and their Bibles..."

Interesting, but...

I thought the book would be more about Olmsted than it was, although the last chapter does tie the two stories -- Horowitz's and Olmsted's -- together. As for learning about slavery and the effects on future generations, The Warmth of Other Suns is by far the more informative and more effective, in my opinion. What I found to be the most informative were the insights into Horowitz's interviewees' political viewpoints. They helped me to understand the "two nations in one country" circumstance we are now experiencing.

The reader was fine for the content, but not the most compelling of the various readers I've heard over the years.

A good listen, lots to think about!

Horwitz was a good observer and had a keen eye for the things that make the mundane interesting. One suspects Olmstead and he would have enjoyed each other's company.

Narrator Deakens keeps things lively, but his accents are weak and seem repetitive as the long book goes on..

Travel log

Frederick Law Olmsted and Tony Horowitz separated by almost 170 years but undertook a similar journey. Similarities are remarkable .