SCOTUS Oral Arguments and Opinions Podcast Por SCOTUS Oral Arguments arte de portada

SCOTUS Oral Arguments and Opinions

SCOTUS Oral Arguments and Opinions

De: SCOTUS Oral Arguments
Escúchala gratis

OFERTA POR TIEMPO LIMITADO. Obtén 3 meses por US$0.99 al mes. Obtén esta oferta.
SCOTUS Oral Arguments and Opinions delivers comprehensive Supreme Court coverage that meets you wherever you are—whether you're a lawyer, journalist, law student, or engaged citizen who wants to understand what's really happening at the Court. Hosted by a practicing attorney who follows the Supreme Court closely, each episode brings you the full story: raw oral argument audio so you can hear directly from the justices and advocates, curated clips highlighting key exchanges, detailed breakdowns of opinions, and clear analysis of cases as they move through both the regular and emergency dockets. You'll find rigorous examination of the legal issues without the partisan spin—just substantive analysis grounded in the briefs, transcripts, and arguments themselves. The archive keeps expanding, with oral arguments now reaching back to 2020 and growing, giving you access to hear how major cases unfolded and compare the Court's approach across terms. Whether you need a focused 10-minute case update or a deep dive into the state of the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause, you'll find episodes that work for your schedule and interest level. Published 3-5 times weekly during the October-to-June term, with regular summer updates covering orders, emergency applications, and retrospective analysis. Your direct line to understanding the Supreme Court—accessible, thorough, and grounded in the law.Copyright 2025 SCOTUS Oral Arguments Ciencia Política Ciencias Sociales Política y Gobierno
Episodios
  • Oral Argument: Chiles v. Salazar | Case No. 24-539 | Oral Argument Date: 10/7/25

    Oral Argument: Chiles v. Salazar | Case No. 24-539 | Oral Argument Date: 10/7/25
    Oct 7 2025

    Oral Argument: Chiles v. Salazar | Case No. 24-539 | Oral Argument Date: 10/7/25

    Link to Docket: Here

    Case Preview: Here

    Question Presented: Whether a law that censors certain conversations between counselors and their clients based on the viewpoints expressed regulates conduct or violates the Free Speech Clause.

    Oral Advocates:

    • For Petitioner: James A. Campbell, Lansdowne, Va.
    • For United States as Amicus Curiae: Hashim M. Mooppan, Principal Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
    • For Respondent: Shannon W. Stevenson, Colorado Solicitor General

    Link to Opinion: TBD.

    Website Link to Opinion Summary: TBD.

    Website Link to Oral Argument: TBD.

    Timestamps:

    Más Menos
    1 h y 25 m
  • Oral Argument: Barrett v. United States | Case No. 24-5774 | Oral Argument Date: 10/7/25

    Oral Argument: Barrett v. United States | Case No. 24-5774 | Oral Argument Date: 10/7/25
    Oct 7 2025

    Oral Argument: Barrett v. United States | Case No. 24-5774 | Oral Argument Date: 10/7/25

    Link to Docket: Here

    Case Preview: Here

    Question Presented:

    1. Whether the Double Jeopardy Clause permits two sentences for an act that violates 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) and§ 924(j), a question that divides seven circuits but about which the Solicitor General and Petitioner agree.
    2. Whether "Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a crime of violence under §924(c) (3)(A), a question left open after" United States v. Taylor , 596 U.S. 845 (2022). United States v. Stoney , 62 F.4th 108, 113 (3d Cir. 2023).

    Oral Advocates:

    • For Petitioner: Matthew B. Larsen, Assistant Federal Defender, New York, N. Y.
    • For Respondent in Support of Petitioner: Aimee Brown, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
    • For Court-Appointed Amicus Curiae in Support of Judgment Below: Charles L. McCloud, Washington, D.C.

    Link to Opinion: TBD.

    Website Link to Opinion Summary: TBD.

    Website Link to Oral Argument: TBD.

    Timestamps:

    Más Menos
    1 h y 2 m
  • Oral Argument: Berk v. Choy | Case No. 24-440 | Oral Argument Date: 10/6/25

    Oral Argument: Berk v. Choy | Case No. 24-440 | Oral Argument Date: 10/6/25
    Oct 5 2025

    Oral Argument: Berk v. Choy | Case No. 24-440 | Oral Argument Date: 10/6/25

    Link to Docket: Here

    Episode Preview: Here

    Background:

    Question Presented: Whether a state law providing that a complaint must be dismissed unless it is accompanied by an expert affidavit may be applied in federal court.

    Oral Advocates:

    • For Petitioner: Andrew T. Tutt, Washington, D.C.
    • For Respondent: Frederick R. Yarger, Denver, CO.

    Link to Opinion: TBD.

    Website Link to Opinion Summary: TBD.

    Website Link to Oral Argument: TBD.

    Timestamps:

    Más Menos
    1 h y 4 m
Todavía no hay opiniones