Oral Argument: Barrett v. United States | Case No. 24-5774 | Oral Argument Date: 10/7/25
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Solo puedes tener X títulos en el carrito para realizar el pago.
Add to Cart failed.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Por favor intenta de nuevo
Error al seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
Oral Argument: Barrett v. United States | Case No. 24-5774 | Oral Argument Date: 10/7/25
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
Oral Argument: Barrett v. United States | Case No. 24-5774 | Oral Argument Date: 10/7/25
Link to Docket: Here
Case Preview: Here
Question Presented:
- Whether the Double Jeopardy Clause permits two sentences for an act that violates 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) and§ 924(j), a question that divides seven circuits but about which the Solicitor General and Petitioner agree.
- Whether "Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a crime of violence under §924(c) (3)(A), a question left open after" United States v. Taylor , 596 U.S. 845 (2022). United States v. Stoney , 62 F.4th 108, 113 (3d Cir. 2023).
Oral Advocates:
- For Petitioner: Matthew B. Larsen, Assistant Federal Defender, New York, N. Y.
- For Respondent in Support of Petitioner: Aimee Brown, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
- For Court-Appointed Amicus Curiae in Support of Judgment Below: Charles L. McCloud, Washington, D.C.
Link to Opinion: TBD.
Website Link to Opinion Summary: TBD.
Website Link to Oral Argument: TBD.
Timestamps:
Todavía no hay opiniones