Episodios

  • 089. ARE Technical: Top 5 Tips for Construction & Evaluation (CE)

    089. ARE Technical: Top 5 Tips for Construction & Evaluation (CE)
    Mar 13 2026
    This episode of the ARE podcast gives five key tips for passing the ARE Construction & Evaluation (CE) exam. The focus is on thinking like an architect under the AIA contracts, emphasizing standard of care, observation vs. construction, administrative procedures, question-reading strategy, and performance-focused closeout/post-occupancy work. Throughout, they stress judgment, restraint, documentation, and staying within professional/contractual boundaries. Listen to the Audio Show Notes Main Tips (1–5) 1. Answer from the Architect’s Contractual Role (Standard of Care) Always answer exam questions from the standpoint of the architect’s contractual role, not your personal or local practice.Think in terms of standard of care: What would any reasonably prudent architect do in this situation, based on the information given? Deep or specialized experience can hurt you on the exam if you override the “standard” approach with niche real-world habits.CE is a national, standardized test, not region-specific.Focus on: Roles, responsibilities, and authority during construction.Who has/produces/reviews which documents.Who can stop the work, what “observe” means vs. “inspect,” etc. 2. Construction Observation (Architect as Observer, Not Builder) In CE/Contract Administration, the contractor’s job: Build in conformance with the contract documents.The architect’s job: Observe whether work conforms to the contract documents and report findings to the owner.Key boundaries: Do not dictate means and methods—that’s the contractor’s domain.Shop drawings: Produced by the contractor, not by the architect.Architect reviews them only for design/esthetic intent, not for how to build.They are not part of the contract documents. Nonconforming work: The owner has the right to accept nonconforming work (A201).Architect must inform the owner of implications so they can make an informed decision. Field reports and site visits: Document date, time, weather, observed conditions.Not a guarantee or full inspection of all work.Architect only visits as frequently as the contract requires, often at agreed milestones (e.g., foundation completion, framing completion). 3. Administrative Procedures (The “AIA Way”) CE is less about technical minutiae (e.g., OSB vs. plywood) and more about admin processes and AIA contracts.Critical procedures and documents: Submittals & shop drawingsRFIsApplications for paymentLien release formsChange Orders (COs)Construction Change Directives (CCDs)Project ManualSubstantial Completion & Project Closeout Core contracts: A201 – General Conditions (owner/architect/contractor relationships and responsibilities).B101 – Owner–Architect AgreementA101 – Owner–Contractor Agreement Why the architect reviews applications for payment: Owner is not expected to understand construction.Since architect observes the work, they can verify claims like “50% framing complete.”Also logical for architect to review lien waivers in relation to paid work. “There’s the right way, the wrong way, and the AIA way”: For the exam, the AIA way is what matters, and it usually aligns with industry practice.Deviating from it in practice can increase liability. 4. Reading Questions for Timing & Keywords (First / Best / Most Appropriate) Many wrong answers come from misreading or reacting too quickly, not from ignorance.Pay close attention to timing/context words: “First” thing you should do“Best” action“Most appropriate” response Always ask: What phase are we in? (Construction admin? Multi-phase project? Pre-bid?)What logically happens next in the process? Exam traps: Fake urgency: e.g., owner is on vacation and unreachable, contractor “needs” a decision. Your roles and responsibilities do not change. If the owner hasn’t appointed a representative, you wait. Multiple answers may be true statements, but: You must pick the one that actually addresses the question asked and fits the given context and timing. In their coaching sessions, candidates rarely reach consensus on answers at first, showing how easily people: Justify multiple answers as “true,” butMiss what the question really asked. 5. Post-Occupancy Evaluation & Closeout – Focus on Performance, Not Blame Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE), substantial completion walk-throughs, punch lists, and final closeout are about performance: Does the building perform as intended?Are systems functioning properly?Are design goals (e.g., better test scores via daylight and ventilation) being met? It is not about blame or combative architect vs. contractor dynamics.POE is not part of the basic services in B101: Basic services end when the architect signs the final application and certificate for payment (changed from “60 days after substantial completion” in 2007). Contracts (B101 and A101) are the framework: They define what each party has promised to...
    Más Menos
    30 m
  • 088. ARE Mentor: Course Correcting After Failure

    088. ARE Mentor: Course Correcting After Failure
    Mar 10 2026
    David discusses how to course correct after failing an ARE exam. He explains why one failed division shouldn’t create a negative narrative and reminds candidates that failure simply means retaking the exam. He also covers how to review the score report, keep momentum by scheduling the next exam about eight weeks out, and use practice exams to better understand the format. The focus is simple: adjust your strategy and keep moving forward. Listen to the Audio Show Notes Introduction & Purpose Addressing listeners who recently failed an ARE examBrief on ARE Mentor vs. ARE Technical episodesMain goal: protect momentum and prevent derailing after a failure Mindset: Don’t Turn One Failure Into a Story How we create negative narratives after failing (imposter syndrome, “I’m bad at tests,” etc.)Core reframe: a failed exam only means you have to take it againWarning against letting a single result become your identity or long-term story Using the Score Report (But Not Overusing It) Look at the score report briefly to see: Where you were weakestWhere you were strongest Reference to Episode 85 – ARE Technical: Analyzing the Score ReportEmphasis that the score report: Doesn’t mean as much as people thinkShould be reviewed for a few minutes, then filed away Encouragement to rely on honest self-assessment of weak areas Staying in the Exam Cycle & Avoiding the “Same Division Loop” Personal story: failing Programming & Analysis (3.0) and waiting two years for the next examAdvice: Don’t take months offDon’t pause studyingDon’t delay scheduling the next exam The “same division loop”: Example: fail PCM, wait 60 days, insist on retaking PCM before moving onResult: loss of momentum Strategy: Schedule the next division immediately after a failAim for about 7–8 weeks out Momentum Analogy: Flat Tire on a Road Trip Failure = flat tire, not the end of the journeyYou don’t turn around and go home; you: Change the tireContinue the cross-country trip Same idea with the exam process: fix, adjust, move forward Strategic Use of the 60-Day Retake Window General pattern: Schedule a new division ~8 weeks outTake that new-division examFit the retake shortly after: PCM, PJM, CE, PA: about 1 weekPPD, PDD: about 2 weeks After the retake, jump into the next division Rationale: protect and extend momentum, avoid long study gaps Self-Analysis: Identifying What Actually Happened Go beyond the score report into self-awareness: Where did the exam start feeling hard? Case studies?Technical questions?Time pressure?Unfamiliar topics? Use these questions to pinpoint weak areas Common Patterns & What They Mean Questions felt unfamiliar (even though you studied) Often means you studied too narrowlyUsually clustered in specific modules, not the whole exam Running out of time / feeling rushed Time management is a major hurdle, especially after long gapsYou don’t fix time management in theory; it requires real exam reps Backpacking analogy: You become a better backpacker by going backpackingDay hikes and training help, but can’t replace multi-night tripsSame for exams: practice actual NCARB exams to build timing skills Making the Most of NCARB Practice Exams NCARB practice exams as: A window into how NCARB thinks about questionsEspecially crucial in the final week before the exam How to use them: Don’t treat them just as a percentage scoreReverse engineer: Handwrite notes and diagramsMark why wrong answers are wrongCircle keywords and patterns Treat them as a guide to NCARB’s logic, not a mere score predictor Emotional Recovery & Course Correction Normal emotional reaction to failing: Imposter feelings“I’m never going to finish”“I’m not ready” Advice: Allow yourself to feel those emotionsThen course correct rather than stay stuck Reframing the episode: It’s about course correcting after a failureFocus on protecting your momentum Core Process & Closing Message Core rhythm promoted in the coaching program: Study → Test → Analyze → Repeat Protecting momentum: Stay in a rhythm rather than stop-start cycles Closing encouragement: Think consciously about how to protect your momentum this weekKeep moving through the cycle until you get your license Please Subscribe Receive automatic updates when you subscribe below! Please rate us on iTunes! If you enjoyed the show, please rate it on iTunes and write a review. It would really help us spread the word about the ARE Podcast. Thanks!
    Más Menos
    16 m
  • 087. ARE Technical: Top 5 Tips for Project Management (PjM)

    087. ARE Technical: Top 5 Tips for Project Management (PjM)
    Mar 6 2026
    In Episode 87 of the ARE Podcast, David and Eric break down the five most important strategies for passing the Project Management (PjM) division and how to think like a project manager on exam day. We begin with discussing the top five tips for project management, focusing on the AIA Contracts B 101 and A 201, which outline the roles and responsibilities of the owner, architect, and contractor. We emphasize the importance of understanding these documents for both the ARE exam and real-world practice. We also cover accounting in project management, which involves tracking changes and staff utilization, and the nuances of project delivery methods. Additionally, we discuss the differences between owner’s consultants and architect’s consultants, the significance of bonds and insurance, quality assurance and control processes, and the distinction between billable and direct labor rates. Listen to the Audio Show Notes Understanding the AIA Contracts David introduces the episode, focusing on the top five tips for project management, specifically the AIA Contracts B101 and A201.Eric emphasizes the importance of familiarizing oneself with these documents, noting that they are readily available online and through NCARB.David explains the B101 (Owner–Architect Agreement) and its significance in understanding architect services and roles during contract administration.They discuss A201 (General Conditions of the Contract for Construction) as covering applications for payment, schedule of values, and the different ways to handle changes (change orders, CCDs, ASIs). Accounting in Project Management They discuss accounting in project management as different from accounting in practice management.Focus is on: Tracking changes to contracts.Tracking schedules and fees.Staff allocation and hours. David notes it is more staff / personnel related: allocating hours, making sure the team doesn’t exceed budgeted hours.Eric stresses thinking like a project manager, not an employee: Don’t always pick the most “qualified” staff person if their utilization is already very high.Look for underutilized staff and opportunities for mentoring and growth. Project Delivery Methods They review the main project delivery methods: Design–Bid–Build (DBB)Design–Build (DB)Progressive Design–BuildConstruction Manager at Risk (CMAR)CM as Contractor and CM as AgentFast-track as a modifier to multiple methods Eric explains: exam questions are usually asking for the most appropriate method given a specific context, not just “a method that could work.”David notes that for public work, NCARB tends to see Design–Bid–Build as the default because: It is traditional.It supports fairness and transparency. Eric expands on CM at Risk: Contractor is on board early.Provides continuous pricing and helps maintain a GMP.Good for complex projects and for controlling cost and risk. They briefly mention Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) as an advanced form often used for highly complex buildings (e.g., labs). Owner vs. Architect Consultants Architects’ typical consultants: Mechanical, electrical, plumbing engineers.Structural engineer.Landscape architect. These are architect’s consultants: Their fees are included in the architect’s proposal.Architect manages and coordinates them. Owner’s consultants (e.g., AV consultant, security consultant, drapery consultant): Hired and paid directly by the owner.Architect still must coordinate their work with the project, but does not manage them. David gives the example of a drapery consultant: Architect provides floor plans, door/window schedules, head and jamb details.Architect is not calling to check orders, delivery, and installation—that is the owner’s role. Under B101, MEP and structural are part of the architect’s basic services, even though the actual work is done via consultants. Bonds and Insurance Eric frames bonds as a form of insurance for the owner.Key bond types to know: Bid Bond – assures the contractor will honor its bid.Performance Bond – assures the contractor will complete the work per contract.Payment Bond – assures subs, suppliers, and labor are paid. Many other bond types exist, but exam focus is on the major ones.David notes that under B101, the architect typically carries five types of insurance: Workers’ compensationAutomobile insuranceProfessional liability insuranceGeneral liability insuranceEmployers’ liability insurance (added in 2017) Distinction between: What states require (e.g., only workers comp and auto in some states).What B101 contractually requires if not amended. Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC) QA/QC processes in offices: Checklists, internal reviews, “red team” reviews.Standard procedures to ensure a consistent standard of care. For complex projects (e.g., with specialized or “wacky” equipment): Extra coordination, double- and triple-checking.Use of equipment/...
    Más Menos
    31 m
  • 086. ARE Mentor: Schedule the Exam Before You Feel Ready

    086. ARE Mentor: Schedule the Exam Before You Feel Ready
    Mar 3 2026
    In this episode, David emphasizes the importance of scheduling the your first or next Architect Registration Examination (ARE) before feeling fully ready. He shares his personal experience, noting it took seven years to complete due to procrastination. He then highlights the psychological barriers, such as fear of failure and the desire to feel confident, that delay scheduling. Finally he advises setting specific dates and maintaining consistent momentum. David also suggesst taking eight to ten exams a year to complete the six divisions within 12 to 24 months. The key is to schedule exams to create urgency and focus, transforming study into structured training. Listen to the Audio Show Notes Scheduling the Exam Before Feeling Ready David emphasizes that waiting to feel completely confident before scheduling an exam is unrealistic and leads to prolonged preparation.He shares that it took him seven years to finish the exams largely because he kept delaying scheduling.Common excuses include: “I’ll schedule once I’m scoring higher on the exam simulator.”“I’ll schedule once I get through more content.”“I’ll schedule when work slows down.”“I’ll schedule when I feel more confident.” David argues that readiness is not a feeling; it’s a decision. Without a test date, there’s no pressure, no urgency, and no forcing function. Challenges of Scheduling an Exam David tells a story from 2013–2014 when he started an online study group for the CSE: Out of about 14 people, only one scheduled their exam in the first week. This revealed deeper reasons why candidates avoid scheduling.Scheduling makes the process real: Now there’s a clock.Now there’s a risk.Now there’s the possibility of failing. As a result, people stay in “preparation mode”: It feels productive but is ultimately safe.David notes that “safe studying” doesn’t pass exams—deadlines do. He explains the “deadline effect”: A real date changes how we prioritize.We shift from over-highlighting and passive study to practice and performance. David stresses the importance of being specific: “I’ll take it in April” is vague.“I’m taking it on April 25” is specific and creates focus and accountability. Fear of Failure and the Importance of Deadlines A major reason candidates avoid scheduling is: “What if I fail?”David points out that if you never schedule, you never have to confront failure—but you also never move forward.He frames failure as: A normal part of life and growth.Central to every success story. David notes that we often learn more from failures than successes.He clarifies that there’s no real-life risk in failing an ARE exam: The true risk is dragging the process out for years and constantly resetting momentum. He shares his experience with general structures: Studied for it three separate times over two years.Each time he got close, didn’t take the exam, then had to restart later.Ultimately passed because he knew the material so well—but paid a heavy price in energy and time. Impact of Life and Consistency on Exam Preparation David acknowledges that life gets in the way—work, projects, and responsibilities.In his coaching program, many candidates: Are in and out of the process for years.Have taken prior versions of the exam (3.0, 4.0) and lost credits. He emphasizes: The importance of consistency.Not letting life continually derail progress. David notes that NCARB removed the five-year rolling clock, which: Removes external urgency.Makes it easier to stretch the process out unnecessarily. Beginning with the End in Mind David recommends scheduling the exam first, before deep-diving into content: “Begin with the end in mind.” This approach: Creates urgency, focus, and discipline.Prevents endless, drifting study. He advises: If you start studying today, schedule the exam today.Aim for 6–8 weeks out, not more. David encourages taking exams consistently: Pass or fail, keep moving to the next division.Don’t wait to pass one division before starting to study the next. Building Momentum: Exam Strategy and Timeline In his program, David encourages candidates to plan for 8–10 exam attempts per year: That covers all six divisions plus retakes. Typical path: Take an exam roughly every two months.Fit retakes in between if needed. With this momentum: Many candidates can be licensed in 12 months.For others, 18–24 months should be enough if they’re consistent. Psychological Shift and Empowerment When you schedule, you shift from studying to training: You now have intention, structure, and stakes.Training ends on test day, then you move on to the next division. David emphasizes that scheduling is an act of empowerment: You decide: “I’m in control of this process.”You commit to your license and refuse to be “wishy-washy” about your goals. He encourages adopting a determined mindset: You want your license.You ...
    Más Menos
    19 m
  • 085. ARE Technical: Analyzing the Score Report

    085. ARE Technical: Analyzing the Score Report
    Feb 27 2026
    In this episode, David and Eric discuss how to realistically interpret NCARB ARE score reports without overthinking them. They explain why content area percentages and “low” scores often look worse than they are, and how weighting and test design affect what the report really means. They also share healthier retake strategies, focusing on fuzzy topics, mindset, and holistic studying rather than obsessing over every data point. Listen to the Audio Show Notes The NCARB ARE score report is vague and often over‑interpreted by candidates.Its only real purpose: lightly point you toward weak content areas after a fail—not to precisely diagnose everything that went wrong. How Score Reports Work Tests are divided into content areas/modules, but: There is one overall cut score for the exam, not for each module.You do not need to “pass” every content area to pass the exam. Content areas are weighted very differently: Example (PDD): Content Area 1 ~ 37% of the test (~37 questions on a 100‑question exam)Content Area 5 ~ 2–8% (as few as 2 questions) So getting 100% in a tiny area doesn’t mean much; missing a lot in a big area matters more. Common Misinterpretations Candidates often: Lay out multiple reports like a detective wall, trying to decode patterns that aren’t really there.Think: “I got 40%, I need 80%, I’m only halfway there.” In reality, that might mean they were only ~10 questions away from passing. Believe online calculators that say, “You missed by 1 question,” which Eric says is mathematically almost never true—most are off by 5–15 questions, still very close, but not “one.” Two Main Score Report Scenarios Low in one content area This is actually good news: You were close to passing.You likely just need to tighten knowledge in that specific area. Use the report as a pointer: “Study more in this content area,” not as a judgment of your overall ability. Low across the board Usually not about content gaps in one topic.More about test behavior: Overthinking, second‑guessing, misreading questionsRushing or running out of timeNot picking up clues in the scenarios Many candidates feel like they “bombed it,” but Eric often finds they’re still only around 10–15 questions away. Flip‑Flopping Scores (Multiple Attempts) After 3+ attempts, candidates often see: Content areas that were strong become weak, and vice versa.Over many attempts, they’ve “passed” every section at some point—just never all in the same sitting. This indicates: They’re capable of passing.But they’re now fighting their past attempts, changing answers based on what they did last time rather than calmly applying standard of care and good reasoning. Eric’s coaching focuses on: Mindset, test‑taking biases, and a “standard of care” mental model to get out of their own way. How (and How Not) to Use the Score Report Good uses: Spend a few minutes with it: Note if one or two areas are clearly weaker.Let that inform where to get a bit more clarity. Pair it with your own reflection: Ask: Was I rushing? Misreading? Did I run out of time? Was I confused by the question wording? Bad / unhelpful uses: Over‑analyzing multiple reports, building big collages and trying to decode hidden meanings.Letting the “% correct” vs “passing candidate %” convince you you’re farther from passing than you really are.Using it as an emotional verdict: “I bombed, I don’t know anything.” Better Strategy After a Fail Write down your “fuzzy topics” immediately after the exam: Any concept where you thought, “I’m not totally sure.”That list becomes your real study roadmap. Study holistically, not just one tiny module: Yes, give extra attention to weaker content areas.But keep reviewing all modules, because questions are integrated and pulled randomly from large banks. If you ran out of time and left many blanks: The score report is basically useless in that situation—it’s mostly reflecting unanswered questions, not your knowledge. Coaching / Tools Mentioned Eric has a score report tool in the Platinum coaching program: Takes the NCARB percentages from a score report.Estimates how many questions away from passing a candidate likely was. He also does five free coaching calls per day to: Interpret reports.Re‑frame how close people actually are.Build a realistic study and mindset plan. Their coaching provides a daily study plan, organized by content areas, to remove overthinking about “what to do next.” Big Takeaways The score report is not an oracle (and not the Grim Reaper either).It’s a blunt, limited tool: Use it quickly, unemotionally.Let it lightly guide you, then move on to studying and retaking. Practically, a failing score report mostly just means: You need to take the exam again, with slightly better content clarity and a much better test‑taking mindset. Please Subscribe Receive ...
    Más Menos
    24 m
  • 084. ARE Mentor: Build Your Weekly Study System

    084. ARE Mentor: Build Your Weekly Study System
    Feb 24 2026

    In this episode, David introduces the new ARE Mentor format — short, direct Tuesday episodes focused on mindset, structure, and execution — alongside the ongoing ARE Technical episodes released on Fridays.

    Listen to the Audio

    Show Notes

    The core message: most candidates don’t struggle because they lack knowledge. They struggle because they lack structure. Studying only when motivated, cramming on weekends, or starting and stopping repeatedly leads to inconsistency — and inconsistency kills momentum. The ARE does not reward intensity. It rewards consistency.

    David shares lessons from his own seven-year journey through the exams and emphasizes the need for a frictionless, repeatable weekly system. The recommendation: study six days per week, 60–90 minutes per day, at the same time each day, with one scheduled day off. Focus on one division at a time, build rhythm, and aim to test every six weeks.

    He also highlights the importance of:

    • Avoiding marathon study sessions

    • Committing to one primary study resource

    • Incorporating a weekly review day

    • Reducing decision fatigue

    • Treating the process like a professional commitment

    The takeaway is simple: build a system you can repeat week after week. Show up consistently. Stop restarting. Create momentum — and keep moving forward toward your next exam.

    Please Subscribe

    Receive automatic updates when you subscribe below!

    Please rate us on iTunes!

    If you enjoyed the show, please rate it on iTunes and write a review. It would really help us spread the word about the ARE Podcast. Thanks!
    Más Menos
    19 m
  • 083. ARE Technical: Top 5 Tips for Practice Management (PcM)

    083. ARE Technical: Top 5 Tips for Practice Management (PcM)
    Feb 20 2026

    In Episode 83 of the ARE Podcast, David and Eric break down the five most important strategies for passing the Practice Management (PcM) division.

    We begin with a critical mindset shift: PcM is not about thinking like an employee. It’s about thinking like a principal. Many candidates miss questions because they answer from their personal job experience rather than from the perspective of a firm owner making business decisions. On this exam, you have to think like the boss.

    Listen to the Audio

    Show Notes

    We also address a common mistake — relying too heavily on personal experience. The ARE tests the standard of care and textbook principles, not how your specific firm happens to operate. Experience can actually hurt you if it introduces bias.

    Another key clarification: you are not supposed to memorize the Architect’s Handbook of Professional Practice. It is a reference guide, not a traditional textbook. The exam tests judgment and understanding, especially in areas like accounting and firm management.

    Accounting fundamentals are a major focus of this episode. Understanding credits, debits, and the accrual method is essential for PcM. These questions are often more straightforward than candidates expect once the concepts are clear.

    We also break down corporate legal structures — including sole proprietorships, LLCs, S Corps, C Corps, and professional corporations (PCs). The correct answer on the exam depends on tax liability, ownership requirements, flexibility, and state-specific rules — not personal preference.

    Finally, we recommend using the Wiley guide to the Architect’s Handbook as a tool to quickly locate relevant topics. It’s not about memorizing the Handbook. It’s about knowing how to navigate it efficiently.

    If you’re starting with PcM or struggling to pass it, this episode provides strategic clarity on what actually matters — and what doesn’t.

    Please Subscribe

    Receive automatic updates when you subscribe below!

    Please rate us on iTunes!

    If you enjoyed the show, please rate it on iTunes and write a review. It would really help us spread the word about the ARE Podcast. Thanks!
    Más Menos
    19 m
  • 082. ARE Reset: Resetting the ARE Podcast

    082. ARE Reset: Resetting the ARE Podcast
    Feb 17 2026

    If you’re studying for the ARE right now, this episode is for you.

    In this solo Tuesday episode, David shares why he’s resetting the ARE Podcast, what’s changing, and how this shift is designed to help you build clarity and consistency in your exam journey.

    Listen to the Audio

    Show Notes

    Why the Reset?

    The ARE Podcast began in 2014. There have been 81 episodes over 12 years. In 2025, only one episode was published.

    That lack of consistency sparked reflection.

    David shares openly that consistency has never been his strongest trait — and that it impacted his own ARE journey, which took seven years (back during ARE 3.0 with nine divisions).

    This reset is about correcting that pattern. Not just for the podcast — but for you.

    The Real Theme: Consistency

    Many candidates struggle with:

    • Taking only one exam in a year

    • Losing momentum after a failure

    • Starting strong but drifting off track

    This episode draws a parallel between podcast consistency and exam consistency.

    Going forward, there will be two episodes per week:

    • Tuesday: Solo episode (just you and David)

    • Friday: Traditional episode with Eric

    What’s Changing?

    The produced intro is gone. No music. No 30-second commercial. No hype. Just direct conversation. The goal is efficiency and clarity.

    Tuesday episodes are one-on-one conversations — honest, direct, and focused on your journey. These episodes are about encouragement, professional mindset, and helping you stay consistent.

    Friday episodes continue with David and Eric discussing ARE topics, the profession, and industry trends — with even more clarity and efficiency.

    A Core Focus Moving Forward

    Thinking like a professional.

    This is not about memorizing technical facts. It’s about judgment, risk, ethics, process, standard of care, and protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the public.

    The ARE is not testing whether you’re a student. It’s testing whether you can think like a licensed architect.

    That mindset shift will be a recurring theme in future Tuesday episodes.

    The 6-Month Commitment

    David’s commitment:

    • A new Tuesday episode every week

    • A Friday episode every week

    Your commitment:

    • Take 3 exams in the next 6 months

    • One exam every two months

    • The same pacing taught inside AEP coaching

    Structured. Doable. Consistent.

    This reset isn’t about production value. It’s about rebuilding connection and helping you finish the ARE.

    If you’re in the process right now, you’re not alone.

    You can reach out directly at David@ArchitectExamPrep.com.

    Have a consistent week. See you Tuesday.

    Please Subscribe

    Receive automatic updates when you subscribe below!

    Please rate us on iTunes!

    If you enjoyed the show, please rate it on iTunes and write a review. It would really help us spread the word about the ARE Podcast. Thanks!
    Más Menos
    10 m