A First-Rate Madness Audiolibro Por S. Nassir Ghaemi arte de portada

A First-Rate Madness

Uncovering the Links Between Leadership and Mental Illness

Vista previa
Prueba por $0.00
Prime logotipo Exclusivo para miembros Prime: ¿Nuevo en Audible? Obtén 2 audiolibros gratis con tu prueba.
Elige 1 audiolibro al mes de nuestra inigualable colección.
Escucha todo lo que quieras de entre miles de audiolibros, Originals y podcasts incluidos.
Accede a ofertas y descuentos exclusivos.
Premium Plus se renueva automáticamente por $14.95 al mes después de 30 días. Cancela en cualquier momento.

A First-Rate Madness

De: S. Nassir Ghaemi
Narrado por: Adam Barr
Prueba por $0.00

$14.95 al mes después de 30 días. Cancela en cualquier momento.

Compra ahora por $18.00

Compra ahora por $18.00

Confirma la compra
la tarjeta con terminación
Al confirmar tu compra, aceptas las Condiciones de Uso de Audible y el Aviso de Privacidad de Amazon. Impuestos a cobrar según aplique.
Cancelar

Acerca de esta escucha

The New York Times bestseller

“A glistening psychological history, faceted largely by the biographies of eight famous leaders . . .”—The Boston Globe

“A provocative thesis . . . Ghaemi’s book deserves high marks for original thinking.”—The Washington Post

“Provocative, fascinating.”—Salon.com

Historians have long puzzled over the apparent mental instability of great and terrible leaders alike: Napoleon, Lincoln, Churchill, Hitler, and others. In A First-Rate Madness, Nassir Ghaemi, director of the Mood Disorders Program at Tufts Medical Center, offers a myth-shattering exploration of the powerful connections between mental illness and leadership and sets forth a controversial, compelling thesis: The very qualities that mark those with mood disorders also make for the best leaders in times of crisis. From the importance of Lincoln's "depressive realism" to the lackluster leadership of exceedingly sane men as Neville Chamberlain, A First-Rate Madness overturns many of our most cherished perceptions about greatness and the mind.

©2011 Nassir Ghaemi (P)2024 Penguin Audio
Histórico Psicología Psicología y Salud Mental Salud Mental Salud Liderazgo Winston Churchill Militar Socialismo Franklin D. Roosevelt Abraham Lincoln
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_T1_webcro805_stickypopup

Reseñas de la Crítica

“A glistening psychological history, faceted largely by the biographies of eight famous leaders . . . A First-Rate Madness is carefully plotted and sensibly argued.”The Boston Globe

“Ghaemi isn’t the first to claim that madness is a close relative of genius, or even the first to extend the idea into politics. But he does go further than others . . . His explanations are elegant, too—intuitively accurate and banked off the latest psychiatric research.”—Newsweek

“Ghaemi is a remarkably disciplined writer, and he examines both psychiatry and history with impressive clarity and sensitivity. A First-Rate Madness will almost certainly be one of the most fascinating books of the year, not just because of the author's lucid prose and undeniable intelligence, but because of his provocative thesis: 'For abnormal challenges, abnormal leaders are needed.'”—NPR.org

Todas las estrellas
Más relevante  
Engaging and informative with clarification on historical leaders and the events that shaped our world. Shows us we are all somewhere on the neurotic spectrum and leaders are not immune.

Excellent read.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

The similarities between great leaders and depression are uncanny. He delves into why some of the most outstanding leaders in history likely had depression, bipolar disorder, and its closely related relative hyperthermia and dysthymia.

Thought-provoking

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Loved the insight as a doctor of public health. Author is a psychiatrist and professor at Tufts.

Solid, evidence-based

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

This is frustratingly not "scientific" as author claims. Study sample is hand picked to prove his theory. Uses one study of all white men to define "normal" and misses obvious counter points. Horribly unpersuasive.

not scientific

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.