We are currently making improvements to the Audible site. In an effort to enhance the accessibility experience for our customers, we have created a page to more easily navigate the new experience, available at the web address www.audible.com/access .
The Moral Animal Audiobook

The Moral Animal: Why We Are the Way We Are: The New Science of Evolutionary Psychology

Regular Price:$24.95
  • Membership Details:
    • First book free with 30-day trial
    • $14.95/month thereafter for your choice of 1 new book each month
    • Cancel easily anytime
    • Exchange books you don't like
    • All selected books are yours to keep, even if you cancel
  • - or -

Publisher's Summary

Are men literally born to cheat? Does monogamy actually serve women's interests? These are among the questions that have made The Moral Animal one of the most provocative science books in recent years. Wright unveils the genetic strategies behind everything from our sexual preferences to our office politics - as well as their implications for our moral codes and public policies.

©1995 Robert Wright (P)2010 Audible, Inc.

What the Critics Say

"An accessible introduction to the science of evolutionary psychology and how it explains many aspects of human nature. Unlike many books on the topic,which focus on abstractions like kin selection, this book focuses on Darwinian explanations of why we are the way we are--emotionally and morally. Wright deals particularly well with explaining the reasons for the stereotypical dynamics of the three big "S's:" sex, siblings, and society." (Amazon.com review)

What Members Say

Average Customer Rating

4.1 (713 )
5 star
 (289)
4 star
 (257)
3 star
 (109)
2 star
 (39)
1 star
 (19)
Overall
4.1 (549 )
5 star
 (233)
4 star
 (180)
3 star
 (88)
2 star
 (32)
1 star
 (16)
Story
4.0 (544 )
5 star
 (215)
4 star
 (169)
3 star
 (110)
2 star
 (35)
1 star
 (15)
Performance
Sort by:
  •  
    Mary Terrytown, LA, USA 10-10-12
    Mary Terrytown, LA, USA 10-10-12
    HELPFUL VOTES
    12
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    11
    9
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "A story of Darwin"
    Is there anything you would change about this book?

    The title


    What was the most interesting aspect of this story? The least interesting?

    Didn't really want to hear about Darwin's life, but forced to to get thru the book for tidbits of interesting info


    Could you see The Moral Animal being made into a movie or a TV series? Who should the stars be?

    not at all


    Any additional comments?

    This book seemed more about the life of Darwin than anything else.

    2 of 4 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Shako Mumbai, India 10-09-12
    Shako Mumbai, India 10-09-12 Member Since 2012
    HELPFUL VOTES
    8
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    88
    10
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    1
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "It's like 2 different books in one"
    What made the experience of listening to The Moral Animal the most enjoyable?

    The first half of this book is exciting, provocative and excellently argued. I was amazed about how the evolutionary psychology discussed could mirror my life. I had decided to buy a kindle version as well to read over. But the 2nd half was a complete disappointment. Boring, insipid and more a biography of Darwin's life, not something I had signed up for. Also the theories were now discussed in such a way as to fit into Darwin's life retrospectively.

    That's why it's 2 books; the first half mind-blowing, the 2nd, contrived and boring. But just for the first half, the book is worth 4 stars.


    Would you recommend The Moral Animal to your friends? Why or why not?

    I would, only for the 1st half


    Did Greg Thornton do a good job differentiating all the characters? How?

    There were no characters


    Was this a book you wanted to listen to all in one sitting?

    Yes, the 1st half was un-put-down-able


    3 of 6 people found this review helpful
  •  
    fredmonster 09-24-12
    fredmonster 09-24-12 Member Since 2008
    HELPFUL VOTES
    10
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    30
    6
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    1
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Provocative, enlightening, sobre"
    If you could sum up The Moral Animal in three words, what would they be?

    Altruism,sexism explained


    What other book might you compare The Moral Animal to and why?

    Dawkins' selfish gene and blind watchmaker explore similar themes but the 3 books complement each other. Whilst Dawkins usually deigns to comment on morality, Wright is happy to give us his view. The first section on gender differences superficially sounds chauvinistic and dated until we remind ourselves of the "blindness" of natural selection. The one point Dawkins made about being able to raise ourselves above our evolutionary tendencies is put into doubt in this book as we struggle with our concept of free will. This is excellent reading for an explanation of reciprocal altruism, kin selection and non zero sum games.


    1 of 2 people found this review helpful
  •  
    JULIO Redmond, WA, United States 09-24-12
    JULIO Redmond, WA, United States 09-24-12 Member Since 2014
    HELPFUL VOTES
    3
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    38
    10
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "One of the best books I've ever "read""
    What did you love best about The Moral Animal?

    This is a great and insightful introduction to evolutionary psychology. I'd recommend everyone to read it. There's a lot of knowledge from that discipline that is useful in our daily lives and that help understand what is known as the human nature.

    While listening to the audio book, I found myself wanting to underline a lot of the contents. I think I will buy the print version as well.

    Thumbs up to the narrator. He deserves special congratulations. Too bad there are no more books in the audible library narrated by him.

    This book is 100% worth your time and money.


    1 of 2 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Eric Ridgefield, WA, United States 06-01-12
    Eric Ridgefield, WA, United States 06-01-12 Member Since 2006
    HELPFUL VOTES
    2
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    16
    2
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Not as good as it could have been"

    The author does a fair job of explaining in simple terms how complex emotional feelings and behavioral tendencies can be shaped by evolution but then gets trapped in his own cultural biases.
    Less opinion presented as fact would have made this a better book.

    2 of 4 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Anonymous 05-25-12
    Anonymous 05-25-12
    HELPFUL VOTES
    1
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    37
    1
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Compelling Writing, Enjoyable Reading"
    Would you listen to The Moral Animal again? Why?

    Wright's use of vocabulary is almost worth the book by itself. The case laid out in the book is largely well thought through even if it is (as the author often reminds the reader) speculative. The narrator has a vaguely condescending English accent. However, the condescension isn't so thick as to be annoying and given Wright's command of the English language the condescension almost seems appropriate. The downsides of the book are (1) the speculative nature of a lot of what is said, and (2) the extent to which it lionizes Charles Darwin. I can understand the use of Charles Darwin's life as a means of illustrating the points being made. It is nice that the books serves as a partial biography of Charles Darwin. But the one dimensional descriptions of his life are hard to swallow, if not hard to believe.


    1 of 2 people found this review helpful
  •  
    peter Houten, Netherlands 07-29-10
    peter Houten, Netherlands 07-29-10 Member Since 2005
    HELPFUL VOTES
    324
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    311
    48
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    11
    1
    Overall
    "not so consistent"

    The author comes across as afraid to link science to morality. First he provides lots of interesting evolutionary evidence why morality is what it is, but then seems afraid of coming across as saying it is what it is and is eager to provide some 'policies' of how humans can improve the behaviour of humans by some humans coercing some other ones (progressive taxation to prevent too many alpha males and laws against polygamy, preventing many females to flock to one rich alpha male). That human nature can be improved by giving some humans coercive powers, is of course a logical fallacy. He seems to be to much haunted by the ghosts of social darwinism, genetic breeding and Skinner conditioning, to take the obvious scientific stance on this.
    Of course what 'policies' do is just give alpha males even more coercive powers as is proven by ever growing government, growing income gaps, wall street bailouts, welfare single mother government run ghettos and beta males being send off to foreign wars in far away countries by the alphas.
    This brings him into the spigot of saying others are perfectly free to opt out of the advantages of morality, but no doubt he would not be ok with opting out of his 'policies'.
    He has some interesting thoughts about determinism and has spotted the problems with free will, revealing some interesting views of Darwin on this.
    What I found the best part is an analysis of the evolution of Darwin's own moral claims in relation to his actions and how it was driven by his ambition and the strength of his personal position at the time of making these claims.
    I also think that a scientific evaluation of morality would also benefit from taking Kant and Molyneux along besides evolution, but maybe that would become to elaborate for one book.

    19 of 41 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Carol LOWELL, IN, United States 12-01-12
    Carol LOWELL, IN, United States 12-01-12 Member Since 2008
    HELPFUL VOTES
    73
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    59
    15
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    4
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Behaving is a choice we make"
    Any additional comments?

    In The Moral Animal I found myself arguing with the anthropological evolution of (mostly) men because the logic is often in direct violation of American culture today. Remember the flack Newt Gingrich experienced when he said men were hunters? It was interesting to have a reason why some women want the “bad boys” and why men ask women to marry them (instead of women asking men). There are exceptions, of course, but humanity moves in generalities. This book has provided me with an understanding of human behavior. By looking at animals and applying their behavior to the animal side of humans, we can see that morals become the great divide. Men famously think about sex most of the time and will mate with any female, just as dogs will; however, if a man has “good” morals, he will remain faithful to his wife/girlfriend, whereas a dog won't remember that he just mated with a female an hour ago. If no or low morals, man will mate and perhaps think about any consequences later.

    There are many examples in the book of various forms of primates to explain why behavior exists. In the early days of mankind, one man would have many wives and concubines and that is what helped populate the world. Today we no longer need to stress population, indeed, we focus on slowing it down through various methods of contraception and imposition of morals. Only man has morals; animals have instincts.

    Sometimes the book drags on and I wanted to fast forward, but then there was that one nugget of information that was intriguing. The reader has a monotonous voice that I often struggled to stay with. If you are a thinker, analytical and are curious about human behavior, this is a must read. You won’t have to ask why someone behaved the way s/he did.

    1 of 3 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Jeremy 06-21-14
    Jeremy 06-21-14 Member Since 2013
    HELPFUL VOTES
    13
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    129
    13
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Not what I was looking for"
    This book wasn’t for you, but who do you think might enjoy it more?

    Boring (and I love to geek out on this kind of stuff).


    What was most disappointing about Robert Wright’s story?

    I didn't feel that the other reviews and the description gave an accurate account of what I was getting.


    0 of 1 people found this review helpful
  •  
    X 01-27-14
    X 01-27-14
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    8
    1
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "meh."
    Would you recommend this book to a friend? Why or why not?

    No. Better books on the subject are available.


    Were the concepts of this book easy to follow, or were they too technical?

    Not technical enough.


    What does Greg Thornton bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?

    Solid reader.


    Did The Moral Animal inspire you to do anything?

    Yes. Appreciate just how good Richard Dawkin's "The Selfish Gene" and Matt Ridley's "The Red Queen" are in comparison.


    Any additional comments?

    I am far from a Feminist BUT this book made me feel like one. The author seemed to believe that all women are gold-diggers among many other shallow and naive assumptions. Too much personal and cultural bias and not enough science.

    0 of 1 people found this review helpful

Report Inappropriate Content

If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.

Cancel

Thank you.

Your report has been received. It will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.