Speech Law

This book reveals the power that lies in spoken word. It is the most deadly weapon available to every man. It directs, shapes and can determine the outcome of personal lives, marriages, families, countries and international relations. This book will guide you on how to realise your dream from vision to reality.

Cassius Marcellus Clay was a Kentucky planter, politician, and abolitionist. He freed the slaves on the estate inherited from his father and paid them a wage. Clay argued that no cordial union could exist between liberty and slavery, concluding his speech with, “If you would have peace, be just, for justice is the only peace.”

Dr. Neal Nybo's "Public Speaking's Six Essential Laws to Overcome Fear, Engage Any Audience, and Deliver Extraordinary Presentations" is a comprehensive guide designed to transform anyone into a confident and compelling speaker, a "Fearless Speaker." The book lays out six fundamental laws: The Law of the Fearless Nobody: Anyone can become a great speaker. Confidence stems from thorough preparation, authentic connection, and a meaningful message, not inherent talent. It uses examples like Denzel Washington's character in The Equalizer and Po in Kung Fu Panda. The Law of Starting with Story: ...

Hailed as the “first freedom”, free speech is the bedrock of democracy. But it is a challenging principle, subject to erosion in times of upheaval. Today, in democracies and authoritarian states around the world, it is on the retreat. In Free Speech, Jacob Mchangama traces the riveting legal, political, and cultural history of this idea.

In The Free Speech Century, two of America's leading First Amendment scholars, Lee C. Bollinger and Geoffrey R. Stone, have gathered a group of the nation's leading constitutional scholars to evaluate the evolution of free speech doctrine since Schenk and to assess where it might be headed in the future. The Free Speech Century will serve as an essential resource for anyone interested in how our understanding of the First Amendment transformed over time and why it is so critical both for the United States and for the world today.

Exercising my #right to #freespeech and #resist #tyranny. Mr. President, Say What?! sells for $17.76 (paper) because, once again, we need to declare our #independence from #tyrannical #reign. And $9.11 (Kindle) because, 🆘, #emergency #action is needed! Mr. President, Say What?! is a collection of Op-ed pieces. As the title would suggest sometimes what is broadcasted, whether on Twitter or verbally, is almost unbelievable. Maybe you, like me, would like to have an opportunity to speak directly to the President and suggest that he take some other course of action or, at least, tone down ...

Edward Larson's classic, Summer for the Gods, received the Pulitzer Prize in History in 1998 and is the single most authoritative account of a pivotal event whose combatants remain at odds in school districts and courtrooms. For this edition Larson has added a new preface that assesses the state of the battle between creationism and evolution and points the way to how it might potentially be resolved.

Free speech is indispensable on college campuses: allowing varied views and frank exchanges of opinion is a core component of the educational enterprise. But free speech does not mean a free-for-all. The First Amendment prohibits "abridging the freedom of speech," yet laws against perjury or bribery, for example, are still constitutional. In the same way, valuing freedom of speech does not stop a university from regulating speech when doing so is necessary for its educational mission. So where is the dividing line? How can we distinguish reasonable restrictions from impermissible infringement?

Free speech as we know it comes less from the First Amendment than from a most unexpected source: Supreme Court justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. A lifelong skeptic, he disdained all individual rights, including the right to express one's political views. But in 1919, it was Holmes who wrote a dissenting opinion that would become the canonical affirmation of free speech in the United States.

Every liberal democracy has laws or codes against hate speech - except the United States. For constitutionalists, regulation of hate speech violates the First Amendment and damages a free society. Against this absolutist view, Jeremy Waldron argues powerfully that hate speech should be regulated as part of our commitment to human dignity and to inclusion and respect for members of vulnerable minorities.

A vast censorship regime has smothered America's digital marketplace of ideas, squelching free speech on vital policy issues. Its supporters regard its benefits as morally and politically beyond question. They contend it's carried out by private social media platforms, not governmental authorities. In Free Speech and Turbulent Freedom, Michael J. Glennon offers a timely and incisive response. The censors are short-sighted, he argues.

This concise but comprehensive book lays out specific answers to myriad topical questions about free speech law, and also general explanations of how and why the law distinguishes between protected and punishable speech. The book focuses on modern First Amendment law, explaining the historic factors that propelled its evolution in a more speech-protective direction—in particular, the Civil Rights Movement. It highlights the many cases, involving multiple issues, in which robust speech-protective principles aided advocates of racial justice and other human rights causes.

With the decline of traditional journalism, there are precious few inquiring eyes watching government and the public service. How can any of us know how our tax dollars are being spent? But there is good news. For at least the past decade, governments at all levels have been busy publishing truckloads of data representing official policies and their outcomes. For the most part, that data is available in the public domain and just sits there, waiting for us to come and get it. This book was written with the hope and expectation that sophisticated data analytics tools can tame those ...

The freedom to think what you want and to say what you think has always generated a pushback of regulation and censorship. This raises the thorny question: to what extent does free speech actually endanger speech protection? This book examines today's calls for speech legislation and places it into historical perspective, using fascinating examples from the past 200 years, to explain the historical context of laws regulating speech.

Facebook has been adopted and loved by many for over a decade, and it has functioned with immunity under the guise of being an "American" company, despite violating billions of people's individual rights and national laws in every country that it's operational. FB makes money from its users' content and selling their data on the backend to advertising organizations, but somewhere between uploading content and trying to turn a profit, it has violated individual rights, as protected by international law, and national legislation, and its users and the organization have not been properly held ...