AI Slop and Your Brain: Attention, Fatigue, and the Erosion of Meaning

Host Leslie Poston explains how “AI slop” is industrial-scale synthetic content optimized for volume and fast reactions rather than accuracy or usefulness, ranging from keyword-stuffed articles and fake reviews to fabricated quotes, fake images, and targeted deepfake audio/video. She argues it exploits cognitive shortcuts like attentional capture and processing fluency, creating decision fatigue, weakening deliberate “system two” thinking, and making it harder to suppress irrelevant junk. Repetition fuels the illusory truth effect, increasing perceived accuracy even with fact-check labels and eroding a shared factual baseline. Platforms’ variable-ratio, slot-machine-like feeds reward engagement regardless of truth, selecting for reaction-triggering slop and crowding out careful human work, with documented economic harms to creators and a sense of hollowness or “existential vacuum” for audiences. Poston recommends protecting cognitive resources by spending less time in algorithmic feeds, curating sources, seeking deeper work, and notes a Wharton paper on “cognitive surrender,” plus her 2026 Women in Podcasting nomination.

VOTE HERE UNTIL APRIL 30th!

00:00 What AI Slop Looks Like
01:09 Industrial Scale Deception
03:04 Brain Shortcuts Exploited
04:52 Decision Fatigue Online
06:35 Illusory Truth Effect
09:14 Slot Machine Feeds
11:35 Emotional Meaning Drain
13:45 Creators and Authenticity
15:06 Verification Tax and Society
16:10 Protect Your Attention
17:53 Cognitive Surrender Study
18:22 Wrap Up and Support

Wharton Paper on Cognitive Surrender

Meta Verdicts, Kids’ Harm, and the Push for Age Verification

Host Leslie Poston reviews two jury verdicts finding Meta liable for harming children: a New Mexico case ordering $375 million in civil penalties for concealing knowledge about child sexual exploitation and mental health impacts, and a Los Angeles negligence case where Meta and YouTube were found liable and Kaylee was awarded $6 million for worsened anxiety and depression from compulsive use starting at ages 6 and 9. Poston cites internal Meta research (Project Myst) and communications likening effects to drugs and gambling, arguing the fine is negligible versus Meta’s $201B revenue. She critiques rapid policy pivots to age verification and digital ID laws, describing requirements like government ID uploads and biometrics via third parties as surveillance, easily bypassed with VPNs, and harmful to those needing anonymity. She notes Meta’s lobbying and covert funding for age-verification groups, and offers questions about beneficiaries, fit to harm, psychology of surveillance, non-technological causes, exposure, and real accountability.

00:00 Welcome and Overview
00:30 Jury Verdicts Against Meta
01:41 Evidence and Accountability Gap
03:00 Policy Pivot to Age Verification
04:11 Surveillance and Anonymity Risks
06:01 Why Our Brains Accept Bad Fixes
08:34 Meta Lobbying and Hidden Incentives
09:40 Five Questions to Ask
12:34 Closing Thoughts

Why “Give 100%” Is Corrosive: Sustainable Performance, Burnout, and Reserve Capacity

Host Leslie Poston examines the phrase “give 100%” in American work culture, tracing it to Protestant work-ethic theology and arguing it became a management tool that moralizes maximum output despite lacking empirical support. The episode contrasts this norm with research on sustainable performance, citing shorter-workweek trials. Poston explains how “100%” ignores unequal baselines via allostatic load, highlights commute and remote-work effects, and details autistic burnout and masking costs. Drawing on Christina Maslach’s burnout research and WHO recognition, the script argues burnout is organizational, not personal, and advocates structural changes and operating below maximum (e.g., “give 60%”).

00:00 Why Give 100%
01:06 Protestant Work Ethic
03:18 No Evidence Just Inherited
04:20 The Math of Depletion
04:52 Four Day Week Proof
06:59 Reserve Beats Extraction
07:49 Unequal Starting Baselines
08:08 Allostatic Load Explained
10:25 Remote Work Stress Relief
11:42 Neurodivergent Hidden Costs
13:14 Masking and Autistic Burnout
15:39 Self Care Myth
16:15 Maslach Burnout Research
19:32 Why the Norm Persists
20:04 Sustainable Performance Science
21:38 A Question for Yourself
22:26 Evidence Based Changes
22:59 Give 60% Closing
23:11 Sign Off

Common Sense or Power Move? The One Question That Reveals the Difference

Host Leslie Poston argues that “common sense” is often used to end conversations and universalize one person’s perception rather than provide evidence. She explains this through naïve realism (people experience their perceptions as objective reality), embodied cognition (gut intuitions shaped by bodily and lived experience), and positionality (social location shapes what becomes perceptually salient). She cites the “WEIRD” problem in psychology showing many supposedly universal findings don’t generalize across cultures, and connects “common sense” to Gramsci’s hegemony, where dominant-group assumptions become normalized as natural and inevitable. Without endorsing relativism, she notes motivated reasoning can make conclusions feel obvious before scrutiny. She closes with a practical test for sussing out “common sense” claims.

00:00 Common Sense Setup
02:04 Obvious as Default
03:27 Naive Realism Lens
06:17 Embodied Intuition
08:28 Positional Blind Spots
10:04 WEIRD Not Universal
14:08 Common Sense as Power
17:16 Not Relativism
18:03 Motivated Reasoning
20:10 One Key Question
21:13 Practical Takeaways
23:56 Closing and Next Week

When AI Becomes a Confidant: Loneliness, Engagement Incentives, and the Risks of Chatbot “Support”

Host Leslie Poston examines why so many adults and teens are using LLM chatbots like ChatGPT and Claude as friends, therapy substitutes, or romantic stand-ins, linking it to eroding community, expensive and inaccessible mental health care, and tech incentives optimized for engagement. Citing Meta’s engagement-driven practices and data harms as an example of industry patterns, she argues similar incentives shape AI “support” tools with little clinical oversight. She discusses attachment theory, parasocial dynamics, and research showing dependency trajectories and correlations between higher daily AI use and greater loneliness and reduced real-world socialization, with chatbots tending to validate rumination rather than promote reappraisal. She highlights lethal failure cases involving suicide encouragement and prolonged affirmation during crises, notes harms also affect adults, critiques child-focused age-verification bills as privacy-eroding surveillance, and points to targeted interventions (e.g., NY’s AI companion requirements) and clinicians asking about AI use, emphasizing real community connection as the root solution.

00:00 AI as Confidant
01:28 Why People Turn to Bots
02:56 Engagement First Tech History
05:40 Psychology of AI Attachment
07:49 Dependence and Loneliness Data
10:29 When Affirmation Turns Deadly
12:47 Adults at Risk Too
15:36 Child Safety Bills and Age Checks
19:23 What Actually Helps
21:39 Closing and Call to Action

Forever War and the Stolen Future

Host Leslie Poston examines a hidden psychological cost of “forever wars”: they don’t just create fear and grief, they change how people relate to time—shrinking hope, planning, and the ability to believe in tomorrow. She explains how chronic threat and recurring escalation can trap individuals and whole societies in emergency mode, erode trust in institutions, and create a sense of democratic powerlessness, citing January 2026 U.S. polling from Quinnipiac showing over 85% of voters opposed military action against Iran. The episode also explores how constant media exposure, moral implication in state violence, and the normalization of instability shape adults and children alike. Poston closes by arguing that resilience isn’t enough without public conditions that restore agency—real ceasefires, accountability, and functioning community supports that make a future feel livable again.

00:00 Welcome and Setup
00:48 War Shrinks Tomorrow
02:11 Defining Forever War
03:19 Powerlessness and Consent
04:26 Future Orientation Explained
06:22 Foreshortened Future
08:17 Time Disorientation
09:57 Cascading Social Damage
13:14 Politics and Authoritarian Drift
14:16 Media Exposure and Implication
16:19 Children Inherit Instability
18:10 Expanding the Future Again
20:14 Closing and Call to Action

Losing Our Heroes: The Epstein Files, Elite Complicity, and the Psychology of Looking Away

Host Leslie Poston discusses the psychological impact of seeing the names of people you once admired or trusted in the Epstein files. Poston examines why revelations connected to the Epstein files can feel psychologically destabilizing, especially when they involve admired public figures and trusted institutions. Drawing on research in power and social perception, implicit cognition, moral disengagement, parasocial relationships, and betrayal trauma, the episode explores how people and systems can minimize harm, avoid accountability, and sustain “looking away,” and discusses grief, anger, and disillusionment as part of responding clearly to what the files document.

00:00 Welcome + Content Warning: Losing Our Heroes in the Epstein Revelations
00:50 What the Epstein Files Really Represent (Not a ‘Scandal’)
02:30 The Eugenics Ideology Behind the Network’s Power
03:34 Why It Went On for Decades: Power, Attention, and Elite Blindness
05:11 Implicit Cognition & ‘Motivated Not Knowing’ Among Ethical Public Figures
08:25 How Media & Religion Train Us to Soften Abuse (Moral Disengagement)
11:25 Parasocial Grief, Cognitive Dissonance, and Identity Shame
13:57 Betrayal Trauma: Survivors, Institutions, and Why Accountability Matters
16:02 Recovering After Disillusionment: Grief, Anger, and Clear-Eyed Demands
18:06 Closing

Sustained Resistance: How Communities Keep Showing Up Under Repression

Host Leslie Poston closes PsyberSpace’s three-part series on American authoritarianism by focusing on the psychology of sustained resistance. Drawing on findings that real-world bystander intervention occurs in most incidents, she distinguishes one-time helping from long-term collective action and uses Minneapolis as an example of ongoing community response to state violence. She reviews research suggesting risk can increase commitment when paired with anger at repression and a belief that participation matters, and argues effective resistance relies on pre-existing collective efficacy built through repeated small acts of trust and mutual aid. She references Havel’s idea of “living in truth,” where refusing to perform compliance with obvious lies creates a growing space where propaganda fails. Poston also outlines factors that sustain activism under repression: emotional solidarity, alternative information/documentation sources as “epistemic infrastructure,” tactical flexibility, and the belief that others share one’s perception of reality. She also discusses the danger of pluralistic ignorance and discusses Erica Chenoweth’s research on civil resistance, including the higher historical success of nonviolent movements and cautions about overinterpreting the 3.5% threshold and changing success rates in the 2010s. Poston emphasizes diverse roles and tactics (street protest, documentation, legal support, sanctuary, labor action, and local noncooperation) and ends with practical guidance: build community relationships before crisis, maintain reality-testing against gaslighting, and choose an appropriate role to make dissent visible.

00:00 Welcome Back + What This Finale Covers
01:05 Beyond the Bystander Effect: What Sustained Resistance Requires
02:41 Risk, Anger, and Why Danger Can Fuel Commitment
03:47 Collective Efficacy: The Trust Built Before the Crisis
05:41 “Living in Truth”: Refusing to Perform the Lie
07:35 4 Keys to Staying Engaged Under Repression
10:17 Mass Participation, Nonviolence, and Diversity of Tactics
12:15 Practical Takeaways: Build Community, Protect Reality, Find Your Role
14:29 Series Wrap-Up + Final Thoughts and Next Episode Tease