Who Built the Moon?

Narrated by: Shaun Grindell
Length: 8 hrs and 5 mins
4 out of 5 stars (74 ratings)

$14.95/month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

OR
In Cart

Publisher's Summary

The authors of Civilization One return, bringing new evidence about the Moon that will shake up our world.

Christopher Knight and Alan Butler realized that the ancient system of geometry they presented in their earlier breakthrough study works as perfectly for the Moon as it does the Earth. On further investigation, they found a consistent sequence of beautiful integer numbers when looking at every major aspect of the Moon - no such pattern emerges for any other planet or moon in the solar system. In addition, Knight and Butler discovered that the Moon possesses few or no heavy metals and has no core - something that should not be possible.

Their persuasive conclusion: If higher life only developed on Earth because the Moon is exactly what it is and where it is, it becomes unreasonable to cling to the idea that the Moon is a natural object. The only question that remains is, who built it?

©2015 Christopher Knight and Alan Butler (P)2018 Tantor

What members say

Average Customer Ratings

Overall

  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    39
  • 4 Stars
    22
  • 3 Stars
    6
  • 2 Stars
    2
  • 1 Stars
    5

Performance

  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    39
  • 4 Stars
    15
  • 3 Stars
    9
  • 2 Stars
    2
  • 1 Stars
    1

Story

  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    34
  • 4 Stars
    20
  • 3 Stars
    7
  • 2 Stars
    1
  • 1 Stars
    4

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    4 out of 5 stars

brilliant

I enjoyed the facts and science as well as the encouraged open mindedness of the book.

2 people found this helpful

  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    4 out of 5 stars

Great book

This was a very good and interesting book. The only real issue I have with it, is that it repeats the same info quite a bit. It goes into the mathematics of everything, and while the accuracy they claim likely isn't as extreme as they claim, it is still within a margin of error and should stand out. Their ultimate theory seems a bit unlikely, but they even admit that, and say that they are open to ideas that better explain it. I agree that science is currently far too political, and valid theories and math get pushed aside to better suit the current ideas.

Overall, if you are a fan of theories that seem a bit out there, a fan of astronomy, or just wonder how the moon is how it is. This is a great book. It also shows how little we truly know about it.

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

A must read for any Moon researcher.

Great information very well researched and presented. This book really makes me rethink a lot of "history".

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    4 out of 5 stars

informative

I love numbers because they dont lie and are without the burden of perception. but the narrator made this tough for me to get through. I kept getting headaches, frequently misheard and had to keep the volume pretty high. it took alot away from the book, for me.

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    4 out of 5 stars

Let the truth be told!!!

A Mind Blowing Message for all of Man Kind. Numerous Revelations and answers to many unanswered mysteries..

5 people found this helpful

  • Overall
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    4 out of 5 stars

Very, very interesting...

it started out with a lot of psychobabble and seemingly irrelevant clutter... but it came together. a lot of interesting data was discussed that seem to make sense.... a lot of the math; actually almost all of it, is way over my head, but the connection is laid out and I'm going to research this more

  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    4 out of 5 stars

<br />sick

loved the mathematics detailed here that proves a creator. moon is not natural and shouldn't be there.

2 people found this helpful

  • Overall
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    1 out of 5 stars

Propaganda BS

Wow, what a waste of my time! The author says this book only concern's things that can be provable but blindly gives credibility and allegiance to moon landings and all that has said to have come from them. He literally gives only 2 minutes attention to only 2, rather weak, arguments about having sent man to the moon. I understand this book isn't about the moon landing but a significant amount of the author points of 'evidence' comes from a seriously disputed event. This ridiculous theory about the moon existing because Earth collided with another mystery planet 3x the size of Mars is pushed as being somehow more factual than those 'conspiracy theorists' who dispute the landing. He says the moon rocks brought back miraculously had the same elements found on Earth and prove it couldn't have originated any further away. So let me get this straight author.... you are okay believing in a theory that parts of the Earth were ejected to the moon, thus why museums like Rijks in AMS found moon rock given to them was just petrified wood, but it's not even possible to consider they were actually taken from Earth because we can't send people past low Earth orbit even in 2019.

I found the historical info about the calendaring done by early civilisations interesting and do you know why? Because there are repeatable experiments actually proving their theories. They didn't 'lose the technology' of the pendulum for example, keep reading to understand my sarcasm. So after about 3 chapters I reached the limit of what I could trust from this either wilfully fraudulent or ideologically blinded author. LOL as I keep listening it's clear his entire theory is based on the moon being made up from Earth material. There is a 'double whack theory' alright. The author is whacked out of his mind advocating a delusion most likely stemming from a joke. And the other whack is me for wasting my money on this garbage.

Don't buy this!! He's trying to convince you that the moon is the product of an Earth <> mystery planet collision that shot out pieces of the Earth into orbit but sped up our spin so then another mystery planet collision happened in the other direction to get Earth spinning slowly again. LMFAO!!!!

What kind of enthusiast doesn't ask questions like why haven't we been back? Oh that's right, NASA is on record, go look it up please, stating they lost the tapes and then found them but taped over them. So you expect me to believe recorded data, video, audio recordings, schematics, everything was taped over by what, Mary Tyler Moore reruns? And also according to NASA, again go look for yourself, says it's too difficult to recreate all that lost technology. What kind of stupid do you take us for?

For anyone who is actually open understanding things that cannot be explained let me share my skepticism about things that are passed off as fact but still today unsupported. Here are some better points to consider, please go do your own research, about how that story was forged so everything we've learned from Apollo can be re-examined. I believe we should try to go there for real before ever wasting time on Mars.

1. Sound doesn't travel in space since there is no atmosphere yet sound was recorded on the Apollo missions and noted in the transcribed audio conversations. The first time it was dismissed from having vibrated through the astronaut's glove and somehow that got up to the mic in his helmet. However video from NASA on a later Apollo mission also has sound when an astronaut tosses something away and it hits the lunar lander meters away. Impossible in space. Modern day astronauts giving interviews discuss how they use power tools on space walks with a live mic and miraculously that glove vibration is neither enough for them to hear anything nor get picked up by the mic.

2. "A funny thing happened on the way to the moon". A documentary featuring footage sent by NASA reveals out takes from the live footage shown on tv in July 1969. Uncut footage shows the astronauts are in low Earth orbit which because that is 'so close' their small round window in the capsule is filled with ocean and clouds. The uncut footage shows how the camera was positioned further away from the window than indicated by the ongoing conversation with Neil A. and you can clearly watch how something curved is placed over the window to block out a portion of what's viewable to make a false terminator line. The audio conversation during this footage where parts where shown on live tv features Neil A. saying they are half way to the moon. But once they think the scene is over, the object in front of the window moves and the full size of the window is revealed along with the most damning evidence. In this video you can confirm the camera is at the rear of the module and not pressed against the window because the iris opens up and you can see a light from inside the capsule along with an astronaut between the camera and the window. Total absurd BS story about going to the moon...

3. Van Allen Belts. Interviews of NASA employees today talking about going to Mars talk about how the greatest challenge is getting people through the Van Allen radiation belts. It's estimated that 5 feet walls of lead (their words, not mine) are needed to pass through here and yet we are spoon fed this garbage that aluminium foil and mylar kept all these guys safe going through the belts twice. And that these guys have lived out long healthy lives experiencing the most violent radiation exposure known to science? That doesn't even account for the radiation on the moon that this author would support exists.

4. Why are events like Fukishima considered harmful? If the space suits we give astronauts to protect them from the extreme radiation of space and the moon have been doing such a bang up job since the 60's surely we still have that technology. After all, those are not manufactured by NASA rather contracted out. Or did that company also lose and then tape over all the data on their biggest breakthrough too?

5. Contrary to the author's agenda, digital cameras are capable of auto focusing and adjusting exposure to take brilliant pictures. Why do we not have a high res camera or video live stream circling the moon today? Putting all the 'lost technology' aside, why do we not have an interface comparable to google maps to allow us here on Earth to go explore the moon? Answer: we'll very quickly discover the truth as the rovers, landing zones, etc are not found.

6. Moon pics. Say what you will about shadows etc but the most convincing evidence I attribute is the lack of reality in the photography done by the astronauts. The cameras they had were fixed to their chest, had NO viewfinder to see what they were shooting, and were not automatic in terms of adjusting exposure and focus. Yet, when we look at the official negatives NASA publishes which shows the photos as they were taken in sequence we find that each and every one was near perfect exposure, focus, and framing. They also were such professionals that multiple pictures in a row were NOT taken to make sure they had the shot. Gimme a break! Go back and look at any film you've taken and with a viewfinder, and controls or auto focus etc, you'll have pictures that mess up, or cutoff someone's body etc. Oh and by the way, there is no depiction of ANY surface disturbance where the landers touched down.

12 people found this helpful