The Thirty Years War

Europe's Tragedy

By: Peter H. Wilson

Narrated by: Matthew Waterson

The Thirty Years War devastated seventeenth-century Europe, killing nearly a quarter of all Germans and laying waste to towns and countryside alike. Peter Wilson offers the first new history in a generation of a horrifying conflict that transformed the map of the modern world.

When defiant Bohemians tossed the Habsburg emperor's envoys from the castle windows in Prague in 1618, the Holy Roman Empire struck back with a vengeance. Bohemia was ravaged by mercenary troops in the first battle of a conflagration that would engulf Europe from Spain to Sweden. The sweeping narrative encompasses dramatic events and unforgettable individuals—the sack of Magdeburg; the Dutch revolt; the Swedish militant king Gustavus Adolphus; the imperial generals, Wallenstein and Tilly; and diplomat Cardinal Richelieu. In a major reassessment, Wilson argues that religion was not the catalyst, but one element in a lethal stew of political, social, and dynastic forces that fed the conflict.

By war's end a recognizably modern Europe had been created, but at what price? The Thirty Years War condemned the Germans to two centuries of internal division and international impotence and became a benchmark of brutality for centuries. As late as the 1960s, Germans placed it ahead of both world wars and the Black Death as their country's greatest disaster.

©2009 Peter H. Wilson (P)2023 Tantor

Buy the book, skip this unprofessional voice actor

The voice actor has trouble pronouncing words, frequently pausing audibly to gather himself before tough ones. And he frequently seems to grow bored with the text he’s reading.

Good history written as an entertaining story!

Overall, the book is fabulous, though I wish the constant references to monetary amounts had some kind of reference point to help with the change in value between currencies and time frames. Again, a great book that I highly recommend

Chaotic and confusing

But maybe that’s just the fog of war and that’s that and we just have to accept it.

A great telling

The author goes into a lot of detail about the event in and surrounding the 30 Years War. The narrative leaves the reader with a good impression of the recounted events, allowing him to make his own judgments on the author's conclusions. Personally, it was sometimes hard to follow the narrative due to the abundance of detail, however I would not wish for a sparser telling.

Less caffeine, narrator

It’s like the narrator was getting paid in words per minute because punctuation did nothing to slow them down. Maybe listening at half or 3/4 speed would be better, but he was going WAY too fast given the density of the material.