
The Pope Who Would Be King
The Exile of Pius IX and the Emergence of Modern Europe
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
3 meses gratis
Compra ahora por $20.25
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrado por:
-
Will Damron
-
De:
-
David I. Kertzer
The Pulitzer Prize-winning author of The Pope and Mussolini tells the story of the bloody revolution that stripped the pope of political power and signaled the birth of modern Europe.
“[David I.] Kertzer’s brilliant treatment of the crisis in the papacy between 1846 and 1850 reads like a thriller. All the characters, from the poor of Rome to the king of Naples, stand out with a vividness that testifies to his mastery of prose.” (Jonathan Steinberg, The New York Review of Books)
Named one of the best books of the year by the The Christian Science Monitor and The Seattle Times
Only two years after Pope Pius IX’s election in 1846 had triggered great popular enthusiasm across Italy, the pope found himself a virtual prisoner in his own palace. The revolutions that swept through Europe and shook Rome threatened to end the popes’ thousand-year reign over the Papal States, if not the papacy itself. The resulting drama - with a colorful cast of characters, from Louis Napoleon and his rabble-rousing cousin Charles Bonaparte to Garibaldi, Tocqueville, and Metternich - was rife with treachery, tragedy, and international power politics. David Kertzer, one of the world’s foremost experts on the history of Italy and the Vatican, brings this pivotal moment vividly to life.
Praise for The Pope Who Would Be King
“Engaging, intelligent, and revealing...essential reading for those seeking to understand the perennial human forces that shape both power and faith.” (Jon Meacham, Pulitzer Prize-winning author of The Soul of America)
“Subtle and brilliantly told.” (Christopher Clark, London Review of Books)
“Richly rewarding...church history at its most fascinating.” (The Christian Science Monitor)
“Required, and riveting, reading that shares many of the qualities of Kertzer’s Pulitzer Prize-winning masterpiece: an exceptionally deep archival and scholarly foundation, and a rare capacity to tell the story of a critical chapter in European history with novelistic verve.” (Kevin Madigan, author of Medieval Christianity)
“A remarkable achievement - both a page-turner and a major contribution to scholarship accomplished with outstanding clarity and economy. Kertzer gives this story a notable degree of freshness and brings out vividly the determination, passions, blood, and gore of this dramatic moment in European history.” (John Davis, editor, Journal of Modern Italian Studies)
©2018 David I. Kertzer (P)2018 Random House AudioListeners also enjoyed...




















Reseñas de la Crítica
“In this riveting tour de force, David Kertzer shows how and why Pope Pius IX turned Roman Catholicism into the nemesis of modernity, with drastic consequences not only for the church but for the West - consequences felt to this day, when religion and politics form a lethal brew. Elegant writing, the pace of a novel, scrupulous scholarship - these hallmarks of Kertzer’s body of work are all in evidence here, wonderfully so.” (James Carroll, author of The Cloister)
“Kertzer provides an exceptionally deep archival and scholarly foundation and has a rare capacity to tell the story of a critical chapter in European history with novelistic verve. He brilliantly links the history of Italian characters to epochal changes in modern European history, including the changing fortunes of the papacy and its rule over the Papal States, of the time-honored tradition of divine right, and of the separation of church and state.” (Kevin Madigan, author of Medieval Christianity)
“The Pope Who Would Be King is a remarkable achievement - both a page-turner and a major contribution to scholarship accomplished with outstanding clarity and economy. Kertzer gives this story a notable degree of freshness, and brings out vividly the determination, passions, blood, and gore of this dramatic moment in European history.” (John Davis, editor, Journal of Modern Italian Studies)
Las personas que vieron esto también vieron:









Many will listen to this book complaining about either what the pope did or didn’t do or what the revolutionaries did or didn’t do and act like they would have done something grand and enlightened. But let’s be honest with ourselves. We would have all likely either acted the same in their situation or maybe worse.
The book itself is interesting and fair if not a bit boring at times and drawn out. It felt like a lot more could have been fit in if somethings had been glanced through a bit quicker. Some parts just seem to drag on forever. You feel like yelling out; get on with it already! Conversation after conversation about the same thing.
Interesting account of historic changes and events
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Enlightenment
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Enlightening read
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
The audio
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Honestly, I think the scope of the book is too narrow. This book only really tells a third of the story of Pius IX’s papacy, and thus doesn’t really live up to its title. Important parts of Pius IX’s life and his affect on modernity are left out. How can you talk about Pius IX’s affect on modernity and the Catholic Church while only mentioning the First Vatican Council, the kidnapping of Edgardo Mortara, and the final, permanent destruction of the Papal States in a brief epilogue? I think this book would have been better as a biography of Pius IX, covering the entire arc of his life from hesitant liberal to reactionary theocrat to the “prisoner in the Vatican,” and how all of *this* affected the modern world. The broader focus would have told the whole story better than a few books about individual stories from Pius IX’s life.
All of this said, the book is interesting. I recommend it, and I intend to follow up with more of Mr. Kertzer’s books on Pius IX.
Worthwhile, But Too Long And Too Focused
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
David Kertzer has a novelist’s ability to draw characters and create suspense. Characters like Cardinal Antonelli, Alexis de Tocqueville and Garibaldi are well-drawn. The pope himself comes across as somewhat tragic, longing for his people’s affection but suffering because of his own weaknesses and his tendency to be manipulated by others.
The history was well-read. I was surprised by how much I enjoyed it.
Like a Suspense Thriller
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Good but difficult
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
A good,but weak man who gave in too much.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
a very good review of this time in history
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
As with his other books, Kertzer came to this one with an agenda. He is ferociously anti-Catholic and seeks to demonize the Church for its failure to embrace his own 21st-century, liberal, pluralistic worldview in the early 19th century. While every historian approaches his subject with his own philosophical beliefs, good historians will offset these with a fair and sympathetic presentation of the reasons underlying opposing views. Kertzer does not both giving sympathetic or nuanced portrayals of the philosophical and theological beliefs of his historical subjects. In Kertzer's biography of Pius XI (The Pope and Mussolini), this shortcoming is offset by the considerable breadth and depth of historical research that went into that book, but given the extremely limited scope of the present book (The Pope Who Would Be King), the lack of philosophical nuance or even-handedness is a serious deficiency.
The reader did a good job and was hardly noticeable.
Biased and limited in scope
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.