Taking Back the Constitution
Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Taking Back the Constitution
Compra ahora por $21.49
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrado por:
-
Peter Lerman
-
De:
-
Mark Tushnet
Acerca de esta escucha
How the Supreme Court's move to the right has distorted both logic and the Constitution
The Supreme Court has never simply evaluated laws and arguments in light of permanent and immutable constitutional meanings, and social, moral, and yes, political ideas have always played into Supreme Court justices' impressions of how they think a case should be decided. Mark Tushnet traces the ways constitutional thought has evolved from the liberalism of the New Deal and Great Society to the Reagan conservatism that has been dominant since the 1980s.
Looking at the current crossroads in the constitutional order, Tushnet explores the possibilities of either a Trumpian entrenchment of the most extreme ideas of the Reagan philosophy, or a dramatic and destabilizing move to the left. Wary of either outcome, he offers a passionate and informed argument for replacing judicial supremacy with popular constitutionalism-a move that would restore the other branches of government's role in deciding constitutional questions.
©2020 Mark Tushnet (P)2020 KaloramaLos oyentes también disfrutaron...
-
Tyranny of the Minority
- Why American Democracy Reached the Breaking Point
- De: Steven Levitsky, Daniel Ziblatt
- Narrado por: Fred Sanders
- Duración: 8 h y 49 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 317
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 284
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 284
America is undergoing a massive experiment: It is moving, in fits and starts, toward a multiracial democracy, something few societies have ever done. But the prospect of change has sparked an authoritarian backlash that threatens the very foundations of our political system. Why is democracy under assault here, and not in other wealthy, diversifying nations? And what can we do to save it?
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Tyranny of the Minority
- De orders en 10-07-23
De: Steven Levitsky, y otros
-
Worse than Nothing
- The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Daniel Henning
- Duración: 7 h y 9 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 70
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 59
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 58
Originalism, the view that the meaning of a constitutional provision is fixed when it is adopted, was once the fringe theory of a few extremely conservative legal scholars but is now a well-accepted mode of constitutional interpretation. Noted legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky gives a comprehensive analysis of the problems that make originalism unworkable as a method of constitutional interpretation. He argues that the framers themselves never intended constitutional interpretation to be inflexible and shows how it is often impossible to know the "original intent" of any provision.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Impeccably Logical, Backed by 100 Specific Example
- De Amy Eaton en 03-17-23
-
We the People
- A Progressive Reading of the Constitution for the Twenty-First Century
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Peter Berkrot
- Duración: 7 h y 53 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 48
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 39
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 39
From gun control to reproductive health, a conservative Supreme Court will reshape the lives of all Americans for decades to come. The time to develop and defend a progressive vision of the US Constitution that protects the rights of all people is now.
-
1 out of 5 stars
-
Hypocritical evaluation of the constitution
- De surya en 03-23-19
-
How to Interpret the Constitution
- De: Cass R. Sunstein
- Narrado por: Graham Winton
- Duración: 5 h y 51 m
- Versión completa
-
General4 out of 5 stars 4
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 4
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 4
The U.S. Supreme Court has eliminated the right to abortion and is revisiting other fundamental questions today—about voting rights, affirmative action, gun laws, and much more. Once-arcane theories of constitutional interpretation are profoundly affecting the lives of all Americans. In this brief and urgent book, Harvard Law School professor Cass Sunstein provides a lively introduction to competing approaches to interpreting the Constitution—and argues that the only way to choose one is to ask whether it would change American life for the better or worse.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Lawyerspeak - How to Interpret
- De Robert G Paris en 03-17-24
De: Cass R. Sunstein
-
The Original Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment
- Its Letter & Spirit
- De: Randy E. Barnett, Evan D. Bernick, James Oakes - foreword
- Narrado por: David de Vries
- Duración: 18 h y 6 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 6
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 6
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 6
Adopted in 1868, the Fourteenth Amendment profoundly changed the Constitution, giving the federal judiciary and Congress new powers to protect the fundamental rights of individuals from being violated by the states. Yet, according to Randy Barnett and Evan Bernick, the Supreme Court has long misunderstood or ignored the original meaning of the amendment's key clauses, covering the privileges and immunities of citizenship, due process of law, and the equal protection of the laws.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Extraordinary Clarity
- De Diana en 01-16-25
De: Randy E. Barnett, y otros
-
Abortion and the Law in America
- Roe v. Wade to the Present
- De: Mary Ziegler
- Narrado por: Teri Schnaubelt
- Duración: 11 h y 43 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 25
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 18
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 18
With the Supreme Court likely to reverse Roe v. Wade, the landmark abortion decision, American debate appears fixated on clashing rights. The first comprehensive legal history of a vital period, Abortion and the Law in America illuminates an entirely different and unexpected shift in the terms of debate. Drawing on unexplored records and interviews with key participants, Ziegler complicates the view that the Supreme Court is responsible for the escalation of the conflict.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Great history
- De AustinCy en 06-17-23
De: Mary Ziegler
-
Tyranny of the Minority
- Why American Democracy Reached the Breaking Point
- De: Steven Levitsky, Daniel Ziblatt
- Narrado por: Fred Sanders
- Duración: 8 h y 49 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 317
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 284
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 284
America is undergoing a massive experiment: It is moving, in fits and starts, toward a multiracial democracy, something few societies have ever done. But the prospect of change has sparked an authoritarian backlash that threatens the very foundations of our political system. Why is democracy under assault here, and not in other wealthy, diversifying nations? And what can we do to save it?
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Tyranny of the Minority
- De orders en 10-07-23
De: Steven Levitsky, y otros
-
Worse than Nothing
- The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Daniel Henning
- Duración: 7 h y 9 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 70
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 59
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 58
Originalism, the view that the meaning of a constitutional provision is fixed when it is adopted, was once the fringe theory of a few extremely conservative legal scholars but is now a well-accepted mode of constitutional interpretation. Noted legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky gives a comprehensive analysis of the problems that make originalism unworkable as a method of constitutional interpretation. He argues that the framers themselves never intended constitutional interpretation to be inflexible and shows how it is often impossible to know the "original intent" of any provision.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Impeccably Logical, Backed by 100 Specific Example
- De Amy Eaton en 03-17-23
-
We the People
- A Progressive Reading of the Constitution for the Twenty-First Century
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Peter Berkrot
- Duración: 7 h y 53 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 48
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 39
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 39
From gun control to reproductive health, a conservative Supreme Court will reshape the lives of all Americans for decades to come. The time to develop and defend a progressive vision of the US Constitution that protects the rights of all people is now.
-
1 out of 5 stars
-
Hypocritical evaluation of the constitution
- De surya en 03-23-19
-
How to Interpret the Constitution
- De: Cass R. Sunstein
- Narrado por: Graham Winton
- Duración: 5 h y 51 m
- Versión completa
-
General4 out of 5 stars 4
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 4
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 4
The U.S. Supreme Court has eliminated the right to abortion and is revisiting other fundamental questions today—about voting rights, affirmative action, gun laws, and much more. Once-arcane theories of constitutional interpretation are profoundly affecting the lives of all Americans. In this brief and urgent book, Harvard Law School professor Cass Sunstein provides a lively introduction to competing approaches to interpreting the Constitution—and argues that the only way to choose one is to ask whether it would change American life for the better or worse.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Lawyerspeak - How to Interpret
- De Robert G Paris en 03-17-24
De: Cass R. Sunstein
-
The Original Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment
- Its Letter & Spirit
- De: Randy E. Barnett, Evan D. Bernick, James Oakes - foreword
- Narrado por: David de Vries
- Duración: 18 h y 6 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 6
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 6
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 6
Adopted in 1868, the Fourteenth Amendment profoundly changed the Constitution, giving the federal judiciary and Congress new powers to protect the fundamental rights of individuals from being violated by the states. Yet, according to Randy Barnett and Evan Bernick, the Supreme Court has long misunderstood or ignored the original meaning of the amendment's key clauses, covering the privileges and immunities of citizenship, due process of law, and the equal protection of the laws.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Extraordinary Clarity
- De Diana en 01-16-25
De: Randy E. Barnett, y otros
-
Abortion and the Law in America
- Roe v. Wade to the Present
- De: Mary Ziegler
- Narrado por: Teri Schnaubelt
- Duración: 11 h y 43 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 25
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 18
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 18
With the Supreme Court likely to reverse Roe v. Wade, the landmark abortion decision, American debate appears fixated on clashing rights. The first comprehensive legal history of a vital period, Abortion and the Law in America illuminates an entirely different and unexpected shift in the terms of debate. Drawing on unexplored records and interviews with key participants, Ziegler complicates the view that the Supreme Court is responsible for the escalation of the conflict.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Great history
- De AustinCy en 06-17-23
De: Mary Ziegler
-
The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics
- De: Stephen Breyer
- Narrado por: Jim Seybert
- Duración: 1 h y 52 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 90
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 75
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 73
A growing chorus of officials and commentators argues that the Supreme Court has become too political. On this view, the confirmation process is just an exercise in partisan agenda-setting, and the jurists are no more than “politicians in robes” - their ostensibly neutral judicial philosophies mere camouflage for conservative or liberal convictions.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Excellent overview of Suo. Ct. Purpose, position and how it actually works
- De Georgia en 09-19-21
De: Stephen Breyer
-
Shielded
- How the Police Became Untouchable
- De: Joanna Schwartz
- Narrado por: Joanna Schwartz
- Duración: 9 h y 8 m
- Versión completa
-
General5 out of 5 stars 30
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 28
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 28
In recent years, the high-profile murders of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and so many others have brought much-needed attention to the pervasiveness of police misconduct. Yet it remains nearly impossible to hold police accountable for abuses of power—the decisions of the Supreme Court, state and local governments, and policy makers have, over decades, made the police all but untouchable. In Shielded, University of California, Los Angeles, law professor Joanna Schwartz exposes the myriad ways in which our legal system protects police at all costs.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
essential reading for engaged citizens
- De SLD en 02-24-23
De: Joanna Schwartz
-
The Case Against the Supreme Court
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Philip Hernandez
- Duración: 14 h y 11 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 11
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 9
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 9
Both historically and in the present, the Supreme Court has largely been a failure. In this devastating book, Erwin Chemerinsky—“one of the shining lights of legal academia” (The New York Times)—shows how, case by case, for over two centuries, the hallowed Court has been far more likely to uphold government abuses of power than to stop them.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Splendid!
- De Butch en 05-19-23
-
What It Took to Win
- A History of the Democratic Party
- De: Michael Kazin
- Narrado por: Lee Goettl
- Duración: 13 h y 41 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 40
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 38
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 38
In What It Took to Win, the eminent historian Michael Kazin identifies and assesses the Democratic Party's long-running commitment to creating "moral capitalism" - a system that mixed entrepreneurial freedom with the welfare of workers and consumers. And yet the same party that championed the rights of the white working man also vigorously protected or advanced the causes of slavery, segregation, and Indian removal.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Timely and informative History Book
- De Asha Sceanca en 03-24-22
De: Michael Kazin
-
The Second Founding
- An Introduction to the Fourteenth Amendment
- De: Ilan Wurman
- Narrado por: Ilan Wurman
- Duración: 5 h y 1 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 8
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 7
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 7
In The Second Founding: An Introduction to the Fourteenth Amendment, Ilan Wurman provides an illuminating introduction to the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment's famous provisions "due process of law", "equal protection of the laws", and the "privileges or immunities" of citizenship. He begins by exploring the antebellum legal meanings of these concepts, starting from Magna Carta, the Statutes of Edward III, and the Petition of Right to William Blackstone and antebellum state court cases.
-
2 out of 5 stars
-
Erudite but wrong
- De Thomas S. Hudson en 01-19-23
De: Ilan Wurman
-
Justice on the Brink
- A Requiem for the Supreme Court
- De: Linda Greenhouse
- Narrado por: Beth Hicks
- Duración: 10 h y 1 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 104
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 87
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 85
In Justice on the Brink, legendary journalist Linda Greenhouse gives us unique insight into a court under stress, providing the context and brilliant analysis readers of her work in The New York Times have come to expect. In a thrilling narrative, she recounts the twelve months when the court turned its back on its legacy and traditions, abandoning any effort to stay above and separate from politics.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
A Must Read, Then A Must Act.
- De Brad and Janean en 11-29-21
De: Linda Greenhouse
-
The Broken Constitution
- Lincoln, Slavery, and the Refounding of America
- De: Noah Feldman
- Narrado por: Noah Feldman
- Duración: 11 h y 14 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 89
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 74
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 72
Abraham Lincoln is justly revered for his brilliance, compassion, humor, and rededication of the United States to achieving liberty and justice for all. He led the nation into a bloody civil war to uphold the system of government established by the US Constitution - a system he regarded as the “last best hope of mankind”. But how did Lincoln understand the Constitution?
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Takes you to Lincoln’s time for a new understanding
- De Jason Cecil en 12-22-21
De: Noah Feldman
-
Power and Liberty
- Constitutionalism in the American Revolution
- De: Gordon S. Wood
- Narrado por: David Colacci
- Duración: 7 h y 5 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 41
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 35
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 35
The half century extending from the imperial crisis between Britain and its colonies in the 1760s to the early decades of the new republic of the United States was the greatest and most creative era of constitutionalism in American history, and perhaps in the world. During these decades, Americans explored and debated all aspects of politics and constitutionalism - the nature of power, liberty, representation, rights, the division of authority between different spheres of government, sovereignty, judicial authority, and written constitutions.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Provides Context for Todays Mess
- De Tad en 07-20-24
De: Gordon S. Wood
-
The Agenda
- How a Republican Supreme Court Is Reshaping America
- De: Ian Millhiser
- Narrado por: David H. Lawrence
- Duración: 3 h y 42 m
- Versión completa
-
General5 out of 5 stars 38
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 35
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 35
Ian Millhiser, Vox's Supreme Court correspondent, tells the story of what the six very conservative Republicans Supreme Court justices are likely to do with their power. The Agenda exposes a radically altered Supreme Court whose powers extend far beyond transforming any individual right - its agenda is to shape the very nature of America's government, redefining who gets to have legal rights, who is beyond the reach of the law, and who chooses the people who make our laws.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
short but informative
- De Matt Gilbert en 10-04-21
De: Ian Millhiser
-
Law School for Everyone: Constitutional Law
- De: Eric Berger, The Great Courses
- Narrado por: Eric Berger
- Duración: 6 h y 28 m
- Grabación Original
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 779
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 671
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 666
Americans wage many of today’s fiercest policy debates and culture wars over constitutional meaning. It’s because constitutional law is so fundamental to our democracy that law schools across the country teach the subject. It's the area of law that determines what federal and state governments are permitted to do, and what rights you have as an individual citizen of the US. Here, you'll get the same accessible, well-rounded introduction to constitutional law as a typical law student - but with the added benefit of noted constitutional scholar Eric Berger's brilliant insights.
-
4 out of 5 stars
-
Read with this Neil Gorsuch!
- De Amazon Customer en 02-03-20
De: Eric Berger, y otros
-
The Scheme
- How the Right Wing Used Dark Money to Capture the Supreme Court
- De: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Jennifer Mueller
- Narrado por: Charles Constant
- Duración: 8 h y 1 m
- Versión completa
-
General5 out of 5 stars 185
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 163
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 163
Following his book Captured on corporate capture of regulatory and government agencies, and his years of experience as a prosecutor, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse here turns his attention to the right-wing scheme to capture the courts, and how it influenced the Trump administration's appointment of over 230 "business-friendly" judges, including the last three justices of the United States Supreme Court.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Dysfunctional democracy explained
- De Mark en 10-25-22
De: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, y otros
-
A Republic, If You Can Keep It
- De: Neil Gorsuch
- Narrado por: Neil Gorsuch
- Duración: 11 h y 52 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 576
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 517
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 510
Justice Gorsuch draws on his 30-year career as a lawyer, teacher, judge, and justice to explore essential aspects our Constitution, its separation of powers, and the liberties it is designed to protect. He discusses the role of the judge in our constitutional order, and why he believes that originalism and textualism are the surest guides to interpreting our nation’s founding documents and protecting our freedoms. He explains, too, the importance of affordable access to the courts in realizing the promise of equal justice under law.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
In present political climate crucially important!
- De Amazon Customer en 09-18-19
De: Neil Gorsuch
Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre Taking Back the Constitution
Calificaciones medias de los clientesReseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.
-
Total5 out of 5 stars
-
Ejecución4 out of 5 stars
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars
- Joe
- 04-01-25
The book offered a, for me, new perspective and approach to thinking about the Supreme Court.
Usually books are written left v. right, GOP v. Dems, Originalist v. Living, etc. This was refreshingly outside of that box.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Has calificado esta reseña.
Reportaste esta reseña
-
Total5 out of 5 stars
-
Ejecución5 out of 5 stars
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars
- Nwcamper
- 03-09-25
Trump playbook
incredible to listen to this in 2025, especially the latter part dealing with Rowe. Hard to imagine how spot on predictions may have been. Educational and helpful to understand today.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Has calificado esta reseña.
Reportaste esta reseña
esto le resultó útil a 1 persona