Making History: How Great Historians Interpret the Past

By: Allen C. Guelzo, The Great Courses

Narrated by: Allen C. Guelzo

Length: 12 hrs and 15 mins

Publisher's Summary

How do historians create their histories? What role do the historian's viewpoint and method play in what we accept as truth? Answer these and other questions as you go inside the minds of our greatest historians and explore the idea of written history as it has shaped humanity's story over 2,000 years.

These 24 intriguing lectures introduce you to the seminal thinking of historians such as: Herodotus, considered by many the first history writer, who replaced the poetic imagination of Homer with istorieis, or inquiry; Livy, the author of a 142-volume didactic history of Rome that spanned three continents and seven centuries; David Hume, who framed English history with an evolutionary vision of economic, political, and intellectual freedom; and Edward Gibbon, whose monumental Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire forged a complex picture of epic collapse and decay.

From the dramatic and military exploits of Xenophon and Thucydides in ancient Greece to Macaulay's dynamic career in the 19th century, from the bloody era of Christian Reformation to the revolutions of the Enlightenment, Professor Guelzo takes you into the trenches with great minds throughout history.

And beneath the surface of written history, you'll examine the processes that create accepted views of historical events, and you'll uncover the ways in which understanding how history is written is crucial to understanding historical events themselves. The journey rewards you with an unforgettable insight into our human heritage and the chance to look with discerning eyes at human events in their deeper meanings.

PLEASE NOTE: When you purchase this title, the accompanying reference material will be available in your My Library section along with the audio.

©2008 The Teaching Company, LLC (P)2008 The Great Courses

History Evolves

This is a nice series of lectures. The Teaching Company for years has provided lectures for customers yearning for that college experience. Essentially their courses are undergraduate level lectures in virtually any discipline. Also they provide supplementary materials--in this case, a PDF with an outline of all the lectures. I enjoyed this wide-ranging survey as history evolved from an informal literary endeavor to a more formal, rule following one. The instructor, Guelzo, takes us from the classical historians (primarily Roman ones) to modern ones (such as Braudel and the Annales school). I actually enjoyed learning about the classical historians because I did not know about the differences in outlook and methodology. It was always to my mind just one amorphous mass (Livy, Plutarch, etc) none of whom were distinguished to me as any different from another. Moving forward to more modern historians such as Gibbon and Macaulay (my personal favorite), Guelzo was clear to show that the historians like them still have much to offer, not least of which was writing with style and panache. Of course, it is the scientific historians who are most commended for their attention to facts and figures, as history evolved from a purely literary discipline to a more objective, scientific one. Guelzo does a good job parsing out how historians changed the profession and how the audience responded.

In terms of style, the only small complaint I had was that Guelzo occasionally gets a little too excited and his overheated style threatens to swamp his story. But this is truly a small complaint. Indeed, I suspect it's more my gripe than any kind of flaw. And despite this, I found this a very enjoyable listen. If you are interested in intellectual history, in the progress of ideas, then you will enjoy this a great deal.

2 people found this helpful

Professor Shows Amazing Breadth of Knowledge

Would you listen to Making History: How Great Historians Interpret the Past again? Why?

I was aware that Professor Guelzo was a renown Civil War scholar, and I had listened also to the excellent job he did on his American Revolution Great Courses audio. Turns out that he has an incredible breadth of knowledge of history spanning the world and all periods. This course is not for everyone. It is for those who deeply appreciate history and who want to delve more into how historians have thought over the years and how the presentation of history has evolved over the years. Those who are patient will be amply rewarded.

Who was your favorite character and why?

Even thought all periods of history are covered, I still like the lectures on Greece and Rome, including Heroditus, Tacitus, and the lessons of the ancient Greek Wars.

What does Professor Allen C. Guelzo bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?

Professor Guelzo clearly appreciates this topic and the great historians of the past. His enthusiasm is contangious.

5 people found this helpful

More Histrionics than History

A previous reviewer criticized the overwrought delivery on the part of this lecturer, and I failed to heed the warning, in part because a second reviewer rolled out an enthusiastic defense. From the sample, I thought I could manage. Wrong.

I hate to criticize a man who is obviously a good scholar, an enthusiast, and probably a fine, lively teacher in the flesh. But I'm afraid this venture just didn't work out. Perhaps at the publisher's urging, the material has been way, way over "popularized."

The thespian antics, wry chuckles, and jokiness seem aimed to hold the attention of a room full of six-year-olds. I almost picture the lecturer with hand puppets.I don't mind a bit of oomph and personality in a lecture. But this is so distracting I find it nearly impossible to grasp the content, which may be very good--but I'll never know.

There may be audience for this. If others feel differently, I hope they will write in. Perhaps I'm just old and mean, but I prefer scholarly lectures as I prefer a martini--straight up and dry, thank you.

13 people found this helpful

Insightful but pompous...

I could not finish the course. The man is just too pompous and enamored of the sound of his own voice. There are interesting insights, though. But the course is more a mediocre summing up of world history than a reflection on the evolving understanding of the nature of history.

1 person found this helpful