Infamy

The Shocking Story of the Japanese American Internment in World War II

De: Richard Reeves

Narrado por: James Yaegashi

Best-selling author Richard Reeves provides an authoritative account of the internment of more than 120,000 Japanese-Americans and Japanese aliens during World War II.

Less than three months after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor and inflamed the nation, President Roosevelt signed an executive order declaring parts of four western states to be a war zone operating under military rule. The US Army immediately began rounding up thousands of Japanese-Americans, sometimes giving them less than 24 hours to vacate their houses and farms. For the rest of the war, these victims of war hysteria were imprisoned in primitive camps.

In Infamy, the story of this appalling chapter in American history is told more powerfully than ever before. Acclaimed historian Richard Reeves has interviewed survivors, read numerous private letters and memoirs, and combed through archives to deliver a sweeping narrative of this atrocity. Men we usually consider heroes - FDR, Earl Warren, Edward R. Murrow - were in this case villains, but we also learn of many Americans who took great risks to defend the rights of the internees. Most especially, we hear the poignant stories of those who spent years in "war relocation camps", many of whom suffered this terrible injustice with remarkable grace.

Racism, greed, xenophobia, and a thirst for revenge: a dark strand in the American character underlies this story of one of the most shameful episodes in our history. But by recovering the past, Infamy has given voice to those who ultimately helped the nation better understand the true meaning of patriotism.

©2015 Reeves-O'Neill, Inc. (P)2015 Recorded Books

What people didn’t know

My world has changed as a youngster. I believe that the interment of Japanese was the right thing to do. That’s because I was young and stupid. Now I’m old and trying to be informed.

A must read

This is an excellent account of an incredible injustice and should be required reading for any US history class.....

A Surprise

I am a Sansei, born and raised in Hawaii. I have been gradually learning more and more about this abominable act forced upon the Japanese Americans. Information was difficult to come by and the pervasive silence by those affected made it seem like it wasn't too much of a hardship. Being from the Islands I knew a lot about the 442nd Inf. and the 100th Batallion, but the translocation was still a mystery. Having visited the Tule Lake site and seeing several museum shows about the Camps, I thought that I knew all there was to know. But this book and the documentary "The Legacy of Heart Mountain" really illuminates what happened and the enormous effect it had on these people's lives.

I felt that the reading was generally well done, aside from several odd pronunciations. Well, shikataganai....

A great book about a dark time in America

This is a great book to learn more about the Japanese-Americans Incarceration, and America's democracy dark time. It is not bringing something new for people familiar with the subject, but it is still a very well written book.

Great book. Performance not so much.

What a wonderful voice James Yaegashi has. This seems to be my common complaint in most books set in or about California. Pronounce the names correctly please. Tanforan wasn't pronounced correctly even once but it was pronounced incorrectly several different ways. If you are a local it's San Peeeedro. It's not San Paydro and so on an so forth. I grew up in San Pedro so I really know how it's pronounced.

The story is spot on and although I have read most all that is available on our homegrown concentration camps I learned new facts. I listened to this book twice and enjoyed it as much the second time as I did the first. I highly recommend this book. it should be required reading for everyone.

great history a challenge to finish

Great history. The book seemed to drone on. however, After pushing onward... the epilog was where the money was! if you give up on the book, skip to the epilog.

important book poorly narrated

Would you recommend this book to a friend? Why or why not?

It is important to understand the excesses which follow attacks. I was reminded that the 9/11 attack on the U.S. led to passage of the Patriot Act, not one of the finest moments in U.S. history just as the internment, of Japanese is a blot on our history.

What was one of the most memorable moments of Infamy?

The entire story is fascinating. Reeves personalized this lingering national embarrassment, taking it from the abstract and making and making it real.

What didn’t you like about James Yaegashi’s performance?

By telling the story through the those who were imprisoned, Reeves puts the reader in their shoes. It is hard to imagine the level of hatred for the Japanese, but then again, the antI -Muslim sentiment in this country since 9/11 was unimaginable until it happened.

Do you think Infamy needs a follow-up book? Why or why not?

The narrator demonstrated no emotion in a book full of emotional highs and lows. Scott Brick, who narrated the similarly constructed "Dead Wake" would have been a much better choice

Hardship and injustice

I enjoy this book because it delves deeper into how the government was able to carry out its actions and justify them. There’s a particular point in the book that I could discuss extensively: the government allowed the military to establish a military zone along the entire West Coast, from California to Washington state. This was a justification for relocating the Japanese from their homes and other similar actions. The book also explores the hardships faced by families in the camps and the political backlash they encountered.

Disjointed, disconnected narrative

What could have made this a 4 or 5-star listening experience for you?

A more articulate narrator would have made this a better listening experience. He pronounced "February" and "secretary" as if the first 'r' was missing.

What was most disappointing about Richard Reeves’s story?

There was no real flow to the book. The book proceeded somewhat chronologically, but Reeves jumped about from experience to experience. The book flowed as if he had not quite organized his notes.

How could the performance have been better?

See above

What character would you cut from Infamy?

There were too many to keep track of. Cutting one would have made no difference. On the other hand, a more detailed following of just a few characters or a few families may have caused the book to flow better.

Any additional comments?

I'll avoid this narrator in the future.