
Free to Choose
A Personal Statement
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Solo puedes tener X títulos en el carrito para realizar el pago.
Add to Cart failed.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Por favor intenta de nuevo
Error al seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente

Elige 1 audiolibro al mes de nuestra inigualable colección.
Escucha todo lo que quieras de entre miles de audiolibros, Originals y podcasts incluidos.
Accede a ofertas y descuentos exclusivos.
Premium Plus se renueva automáticamente por $14.95 al mes después de 30 días. Cancela en cualquier momento.
Compra ahora por $19.74
-
Narrado por:
-
James Adams
Listeners also enjoyed...




















Reseñas de la Crítica
"Excellent book....This reviewer has never read a more straightforward and simple statement of the present ills facing our society and what we as citizens in a democracy must do about them." ( Chicago Sun Times)
"Milton Friedman puts verities back into focus and puts us back in touch with how a free and abundant society can work - if we let it. That is why he deserved his Nobel Prize in economics, and it is why you should read this book." ( Reader's Digest)
"Milton Friedman puts verities back into focus and puts us back in touch with how a free and abundant society can work - if we let it. That is why he deserved his Nobel Prize in economics, and it is why you should read this book." ( Reader's Digest)
Las personas que vieron esto también vieron:


















All topics discussed in the book are relevant today. It’s just super depressing we are much more worse off.
Too bad Government didn’t listen to Friedman
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Important reading, now more than ever
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
what insight that man had
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Classic!
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
We often tell ourselves in America that we are the land of the free, but this has hardly rung true for many decades. The distinction between charity and compulsory welfare programs, which often achieve the opposite of their stated goals, has been all but lost in our education system and society on the whole. I find myself curious how different our society would be if this were mandatory reading in high school. There undoubtedly would be such flavors of schools if universal voucher programs were adopted as he suggests. Every day since this book was written it seems like our political choices are increasingly between left and right wing socialism controlled by two different coalitions of special interests.
Though I almost ubiquitously agree with Friedman, I wish he had more fully outlined exactly what roles the government should take on. Roads? Police? He does give a general outline, and I believe doesn’t want to come off as radical, but if his logic is properly followed to its ends we will discover how extremely few legitimate uses of government there are, particularly at the federal level.
I also wish he had spent more time criticizing the American election system. First Past the Post necessitates us arriving at a two party system through the spoiled vote phenomenon. Various ideas such as ranked choice voting could, and do in various European countries, remedy this problem. This seems like the only viable path forward for libertarianism, or any third party, against the monolithic, or duolithic, two party system.
He is also adamant that a democracy should be maintained despite all evidence showing us that democracy is legitimized mob rule used to steal some people’s labor for the benefit of others. I don’t see why an authoritarian regime which protects liberty is inferior to mob rule which demands half of your income. Obviously the book is about freedom of choice, and that we should try to win over the political realm to enthusiastically favoring liberty, but the political realm is fundamentally different from private choices. Only you bear the suffering endured from poor personal choices. Others bear the suffering caused by poor, and inherently violent and narcissistic, political choices. People are good at economizing their shopping choices, but not their political choices. Obviously I would prefer that everyone wake up tomorrow valuing liberty and feeling no sense of entitlement to others possessions or income, but I am under no illusions of this happening.
Liberty - the forgotten virtue
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Awesome
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Explains Western philosophy
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Read This
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Sound economics from a libertarian perspective.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Accessible economics
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.