Demagogue for President
The Rhetorical Genius of Donald Trump
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Compra ahora por $13.97
-
Narrado por:
-
Suzie Althens
Historic levels of polarization, a disaffected and frustrated electorate, and widespread distrust of government, the news media, and traditional political leadership set the stage in 2016 for an unexpected, unlikely, and unprecedented presidential contest. Donald Trump’s campaign speeches and other rhetoric seemed on the surface to be simplistic, repetitive, and disorganized to many. As Demagogue for President shows, Trump’s campaign strategy was anything but simple.
Political communication expert Jennifer Mercieca shows how the Trump campaign expertly used the common rhetorical techniques of a demagogue, a word with two contradictory definitions - “a leader who makes use of popular prejudices and false claims and promises in order to gain power” or “a leader championing the cause of the common people in ancient times” (Merriam-Webster, 2019). These strategies, in conjunction with post-rhetorical public relations techniques, were meant to appeal to a segment of an already distrustful electorate. It was an effective tactic.
Mercieca analyzes rhetorical strategies such as argument ad hominem, argument ad baculum, argument ad populum, reification, paralipsis, and more to reveal a campaign that was morally repugnant to some but to others a brilliant appeal to American exceptionalism. By all accounts, it fundamentally changed the discourse of the American public sphere.
©2020 Jennifer Mercieca (P)2020 Blackstone PublishingLos oyentes también disfrutaron:
Las personas que vieron esto también vieron:
A Summer 2020 Must Read
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
The only areas for improvement that you will notice right away:
1) The tons and cadence of the narrator doesn’t match with what is being said. That being said, it helps break down the speeches so you can focus on the rhetorical techniques taught in the book.
2) The author used the word “Demagogue” ad infinitum. I would recommend using a synonym for that word, because it was used multiple times a sentence which made it hard to focus on the message at times.
Overall, this is by far one of the top books on Rhetorical Persuasion and is non-stop. The book focuses entirely in what was said in speeches and interviews and why each technique was the perfect fit for each situation. Really well done!
Excellent Analysis
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Excellence
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Biased and a struggle to read
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Only partly about rhetoric  
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.