Clouds of Witness

Lord Peter Wimsey Book 2

By: Dorothy L. Sayers

Narrated by: Jane McDowell

Length: 9 hrs and 32 mins

Publisher's Summary

The best of the golden age crime writers, praised by all the top modern writers in the field including P. D. James and Ruth Rendell, Dorothy L. Sayers created the immortal Lord Peter Wimsey. His second appearance is a thrilling quest to save his own brother - the Duke of Denver - from the hangman.

The Duke of Denver, accused of murder, stands trial for his life in the House of Lords. Naturally, his brother Lord Peter Wimsey is investigating the crime - this is a family affair. The murder took place at the duke's shooting lodge and Lord Peter's sister was engaged to marry the dead man.

But why does the duke refuse to co-operate with the investigation? Can he really be guilty, or is he covering up for someone?

©1926 The Trustees of Anthony Fleming (deceased) (P)2014 Hodder & Stoughton

Critic Reviews

"She brought to the detective novel originality, intelligence, energy and wit." (P. D. James)

"D. L. Sayers is one of the best detective story writers." (E. C. Bentley, Daily Telegraph)

"I admire her novels . . . she has great fertility of invention, ingenuity and a wonderful eye for detail" (Ruth Rendell)

Not the right narrator

Sadly, this fantastic story is rather hampered by the narrator who over-acts the reading and whose accents are cringeworthy and inconsistent. This plot calls for many regional voices, from Yorkshire to Cockney with quite a bit of French thrown in. I didn't find any of them convincing. If the series was narrated by Ian Carmichael or even Gordon Griffin who have narrated other Lord Wimsey stories available on Audible I would buy the lot but I'm afraid I'm put off!

A classic story, let down by wrong reader

I'm a great fan of the Lord Peter Wimsey stories, so was looking forward to this. But oh dear. This narrator is okay with the narrative, but her reading of dialogue is just so weird it's thoroughly distracting. Inspector Parker's voice was odd it itself, but Wimsey's voice was even worse - affected and high-pitched, bordering on shrill and squeaky. Since there is a lot of dialogue, it's difficult to ignore. Until I started listening to this book, I was looking forward to ordering other stories in the series, but I definitely won't be now. Incidentally, it was only recently that I bought Busman's Honeymoon from Audible, read by Ian Carmichael. It's excellent - but now no longer being listed! Why on earth not? Carmichael's voice is well-modulated and pleasant, and he gives such an intelligent reading that I'd happily buy any of the unabridged novels if read by him.

Narrator Lets it Down

What did you like best about Clouds of Witness? What did you like least?

The twisting plot is interesting and you learn more of the history of the main character.

Any additional comments?

Like other reviewers, I really felt that the narrator was not the best choice for this book. The range of characters are not well demonstrated by the required dialects, or indeed changes in voice.

Maybe because this was written in a different era, but I found the story a bit boring in places, although the overall outcome was interesting.

Good story, if you can get over the slightly annoying narration

I like this story for its background more than its plot - it is not as satisfying a mystery as some of the others, and has quite a few coincidental red herring - but it brings Peter somewhat closer to his family and sets up future plot lines nicely. As mentioned by other reviewers, the narration is rather irritating, I agree entirely with their comments so won't repeat them. However I'd say that I got used to the style after a while so it became less grating. Though the downright errors still did annoy (eg mispronunciations which would take just a little research to have got right, and saying "first" instead of "fist", and "word" instead of "Lord"). Saying all that, I would probably have overlooked these if it weren't for the price tag of over £20.

I Detest This Reader

I have loved Dorothy L Sayers for decades and feel so very sorry that this reader was allowed to mangle these books. Why a woman who can not do voices was allowed to read books with mostly male characters is beside me. Why no one listed to her and stopped her is beyond me. The catalogue of what she does wrong would exceed the permitted words.
Shame on everyone involved in this. I would have loved having all the books but I can't bear to listen.

Wrong narrator

Have now listened to two titles with this narrator, my opinion has not changed. In this instance I will stick to the printed version in the hope that a less irritating narration will be forthcoming in the future.

If I could give it a minus I would

Wonderful book! One of my favourite writers murdered by the worst narrator in the world. Go away and bring back the Ian Carmichael version you stole from me Audible

I love Peter Wimsey but ...

...I won't be buying any more of these: the reader is just awful. Dull, can't do acents but tries, reads these stories like they're P G Wodehouse when they are actually quite serious, dark and forensic in nature. She has a lovely voice but is completely wrong for Ms Sayers work. A great shame.

HORRIBLE reading.

Such a good story spoilt by terrible reading. Full of mispronunciations and badly placed emphases. So sad that she appears to have read them all as well.

Not the best reading

A classic crime story of the golden Age, but I did not take to the reading, lovely as the voice of the reader is. There were strange changes in emphasis mid-sentence causing the flow of the narrative to be spoilt. which is a shame. Also I may be old-fashioned but I think a male reader would have been better given the hero of the tale.