Your audiobook is waiting…

Aquinas: Bolinda Beginner Guides

Narrated by: Adrian Mulraney
Length: 7 hrs and 35 mins
4.5 out of 5 stars (90 ratings)
Regular price: $17.47
$14.95/month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Editorial Reviews

Understanding St. Thomas Aquinas is important for anyone wishing to study the modern philosophy of religion, and this guide from Associate Professor of Philosophy at Pasadena City Colelge Edward Feser provides a balanced, thorough overview of this philosophical great. Adrian Mulraney's velvety, calming voice makes this audiobook a pleasure to listen to, and audiences will easily absorb Feser's concise yet comprehensive history. Aquinas is most famous for his arguments for the existence of God, and Feser makes clear that an understanding of Aquinas' theology is integral to grasping his philosophy.

Publisher's Summary

One of the most influential philosophers and theologians in the history of Western thought, St. Thomas Aquinas established the foundations for much of modern philosophy of religion, and is famous for his arguments for the existence of God. In this cogent and multifaceted introduction to the great saint's work, Edward Feser argues that one cannot fully understand Aquinas' philosophy without his theology, and vice-versa.

Covering his thoughts on the soul, natural law, metaphysics, and the interaction of faith and reason, this will prove an indispensable resource for students, experts, or the general reader.

©2009 Edward Feser (P)2012 Bolinda Publishing Pty Ltd

What members say

Average Customer Ratings

Overall

  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    66
  • 4 Stars
    16
  • 3 Stars
    4
  • 2 Stars
    1
  • 1 Stars
    3

Performance

  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    52
  • 4 Stars
    15
  • 3 Stars
    5
  • 2 Stars
    3
  • 1 Stars
    2

Story

  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    56
  • 4 Stars
    11
  • 3 Stars
    5
  • 2 Stars
    1
  • 1 Stars
    2
Sort by:
  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Excellent book marred by faulty pronunciation

Throughout this book, I never ceased to be dazzled by Feser's explication of Aquinas's thought. With lucid prose, he manages to present Aquinas's philosophy in a way that I think can be grasped by general readers, without diminishing the rigor or force of the arguments. The book sticks to Aquinas's philosophy, without covering his theology based on revelation.

After a brief survey of Thomas's life, Feser covers: Aristotelian metaphysics, natural theology (a brilliant presentation of the five ways of proving God's existence), philosophy of mind, and ethics. He shows how all of these positions are as valid now as ever and can be defended without recourse to divine revelation, if we keep in mind the context of Thomas's metaphysics as a whole.

The only drawback to this audiobook is the narration. The pace of reading is fine, and Mulraney's voice is not unpleasant in itself. But he mispronounces so many words: Aristotelian, Averroes, Leibniz, and many others. I found this pretty disturbing, as some of these words recur frequently.

Bottom line: it's a great book and well worth the download, but don't teach yourself pronunciation from this reader. Hopefully we will see more of Feser on Audible. He's really that good.

6 of 6 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Excellent introduction

Aquinas has always seemed hopelessly dense to me, but Professor Fraser’s introduction placed him within the Aristotelian framework in which he operated. I’ll probably have to revisit the book several times to get everything, but it did more for my understanding of Aquinas than anything I’ve ever read before.

2 of 2 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    2 out of 5 stars

A lot of merit, but bad as introduction to Thomism

This audiobook is being sold as “Beginners Guide”, and it is therefore being assessed as such. If not for the unfortunate decision of the editors to direct the title towards beginners, I would rate it 4 stars. Such poor judgment will certainly influence my willingness to acquire other titles marketed by Bolinda.

The author defends his points intelligently and elegantly, though not always in completely convincing or fallacy free manner. While I disagree with most of its conclusions, hearing it made me reexamine my beliefs in a way they now lay on more solid basis. I see no way to acquire any depth in philosophy (or in any other complex matters) other than allowing your thoughts to be challenged by people that think differently than you.

But I perceive this audiobook as completely unsuited for beginners, for following reasons:
- There is no intention here to offer a general overview of the Thomist ideas, situate them in the cultural context, examine the influences in and out of it and point their place in the history of the western thought. For such things that are generally important for beginners, you must look elsewhere. This is just an in-depth discussion of specific philosophical concepts which are relevant to the authors religious agenda. All that is completely legitimate, but also completely unsuited for beginners.
- Though the author exposes it's arguments in clear words and in logical order, what you will find there an unbroken sequence of concatenated arguments, with no quarter for those which do not have their attention 100% committed to the hearing. And if you wish to do the hearing in a reflective and critical way, which is the only way that makes the endeavor worth, you will often find yourself pausing and retroceding. In my opinion, if you are not already deep into philosophy, this title is much better suited to reading that to hearing. I believe most of the beginners will find it very dry.
- This is a defense of the Thomism by a staunch believer, with both feet stuck in the 13th century. Any opposing view to Thomism is exposed only insofar as to be most easily refuted. I think the beginners would benefit from a more critical and balanced point of view.
- The author deals with Aristotelian/Thomist thought mostly as a single block, and you may finish the book without an idea on distinctive contribution of St. Thomas built on top of its Aristotelean basis.

The author pursues two objectives. The first is to show that the Thomist conceptual bases are still an acceptable point of departure, undefeated by the passing of time. The second,is to show that the Thomist ideas, and in particular its proofs of God existence and of different aspects of the divine nature, form a body with perfect internal coherence, and with many advantages over the “mechanicist” view of the nature.

As for the first objective, the author missed the point of his foes: Aristotelian assumptions were abandoned by most of the modern scholars not because they are incoherent, but because its bloated ontology it is not necessary to account for the phenomena – it does not pass the Occam’s razor. And also because the “mechanicism” is able to obtain progress where Aristotelian/Thomist alternative strikes a dead end. As for the second objective I believe he does much better, though not perfect, job in showing the internal coherence than the advantages.

The most relevant issue with the “mechanicism” would be that the Thomist scholasticism allegedly allows to grasp the ultimate causes (God) while “mechanicism” does not. Here, the author does the same thing he sometimes accuses his opponent of doing: lists as shortcoming something that is indeed out of scope. “Mechanicism” does leave the place of the last cause vacant, and it will always be possible to fit God there. Indeed, the philosophers that brought the dominion of scholasticism to the end were mostly deeply religious people, such as Descartes and Leibniz.

One of such assumptions is the alleged impossibility of the infinite regress. There is nothing indisputable in it, and many modern scientist do indeed postulate a cyclic nature of the universe. The possibility of infinite regress does indeed nicely cohere with what we know. The author further argues for the necessity of a finite chain of necessarily simultaneous causal events, which would always begin, of course, with a divinity which sustain the functioning of the universe. For that to work, he would need to rule out one of the basic facts of our experience: that the thing that happen in past and the present have causal bearings on future.

The author goes so far in order to save the Aquinas arguments as to modify them when he notices they will not withstand the criticism as they are. The most obvious example is the proof of the existence of God from degrees of perfection. There, the author is forced to sacrifice the generality of the Aquinas’ claim to restrict it only to God’s transcendental perfections, turning it effectively in Feserian, and not Thomist, thesis. But a lot of things still remain unexplained. Why some properties require the reference to the superlative perfection and other not? Why we could not use as reference of perfection the most perfect thing we know from our immediate experience? And finally, how we can establish as reference the divine perfection our mind is not even able to grasp?

My general impression is that author, as Aquinas himself, picks the base assumptions that will allow for the pretended final conclusion. And it all becomes circularly referenced: the author departs from the final cause, which, the author admits that (at least in case of inanimate substances) must be lent by God, to prove the God as existing. And it is a large detour to come to a rather obvious conclusion: that God is able to plug all the gaps in knowledge.

For me, the existence of God is still a matter of personal belief. And maybe it is meant to be like that. If we were supposed to reach such knowledge rationally, God would have no problems in providing easily accessible evidences for it. Where the atheist may see just the lack of evidences, the Christians may see a God that values faith above everything. And faith may only exist if there is space left for doubt.

1 of 1 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    1 out of 5 stars

for me, too wonky too quickly

for me, too wonky too quickly. found myself needing to focus and concentrate and or rewind / re-listen too often

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Love the narrator, great voice

This book is technically dense however don't let that deter you from listening, when absorbed in tiny chunks it becomes approachable. Actually I put this on at bedtime and continually play to it over and over, for a good month now. The male narrator, a Brit has an absolutely wonderful voice, calm and measured, I find it lulls me into a fantastic sleep and I don't mean that as a negative comment. Digest this in pieces, empty your brain and pack more in a little at a time. Quite worth it.

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Great book

Really explains Aquinas 5 ways they way they are supposed to be understood and in a way that can be understood by those of us lacking in our philosophical knowledge

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars

Loved it ...very insightful..Mr Mulraney reading w

loved it...insightful...Mr. Mulraney reading was superb...I wish I had him as a teacher in school...in St.Thomas or any subject...I must purchase other works with/ Mulraney as narrator...thx very much!

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Thomism for Beginners Indeed

I went in only knowing a bit about Aquinas and left with a great overview of his philosophy.
Don’t expect a full biography or too many details about one of history’s greatest minds; rather, the mind itself is under review. His philosophy was and remains groundbreaking. Feser goes into detail on the Five Ways, hylomorphism and other aspects, while also integrating and supplementing his content with modern defenses and later developmemts in Thomism.
Expect a hard listen with proper narration. Highly recommended.

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Art
  • Mira Loma, CA
  • 04-22-16

Mind blower

Mr. Feser makes Aquinas understandable to me, the average Joe, but makes me hungry to dive in deeper to St Thomas.

Sort by:
  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars
  • John
  • 05-23-16

Clear explanation

This book is primarily about metaphysics - which was great for me; after being taught metaphysics for a year and not making much progress this book really brought me on. The book shows how metaphysics underpins a lot of Aquinas work. The book is around undergraduate in complexity