I speak again with RN and medical-freedom activist Sierra Hamm, about what's going on in the world of protecting the blood supply and helping folks to access blood that is not contaminated with the mRNA product.

We discuss her organization, Reconciliation, and what it's been up to, as well as some legislation she's been helping to develop. We also talk about why blood banks are cracking down on directed donations, and what they really do with all the blood they are given!

Most importantly, we talk about new developments in testing and analysis for blood contamination, and about possible detox protocols.

There's a lot to be worried about in this realm. Sierra's message here is: There is also lots of reason for hope!

Our earlier interview is here.

Sierra's organization, Reconciliation, is here.

Links to some of what we discussed:

Detox:

Turn off the production of spike by getting rid of mRNA.

Other detox protocols cannot turn off spike production but they can help get spike out.

Testing:

Sierra's blog post about this.

History of delaying testing for contamination in the blood supply… leading to thousands of lives ended from blood supply.

The hospital that shut down because they couldn't get enough blood – Yet here they are harvesting blood.

International Gene Therapy Industry:

DARPA Seeking gene editing pros.

Blackrock has bought a blood bank and has $1.5 Billion set up for "new life sciences platform."

Could Blackrock be investing for CRISPR tech? When people come to grips with the massive bioweapon that was used against them...

CRISPR gene editing companies are being traded on the stock market.

Assassinated Russian general had exposed gene editing facilities around Ukraine.

As RFK Jr. is grilled by a roomful of politicians about his plans to re-shape public health agencies, I speak with classical homeopath Sarah Thompson about how we got to this point.

We talk about the history of the political takeover of medical practice, education, and research, including the founding of the AMA and the economic incentives behind this power grab.

We also talk specifically about homeopathy, and about the long-standing relentless assault on this particular modality by the medical establishment. We talk about the fundamental difference in paradigms between the two modalities, and why little sugar pills pose such a threat to mainstream practitioners and institutions.

You can find Sarah here;

Sarah is also on X;

You can find Harris Coulter's Divided Legacy: A History of the Schism in Medical Thought, at the Brownstone Institute;

Americans for Homeopathy Choice is here;

I spoke here with economist Bob Murphy about getting the state out of health care;

And I spoke here with journalist Jeremy R. Hammond, on the question "should medical licensing be abolished?"

Tom Luongo likes to pull on threads. He keeps pulling no matter where they take him, even they lead places that challenge some of the most deeply held convictions of libertarians.

In this episode, we talk (again) about Tom's view that – in this particular moment in time – we might want to be cheering for the US Federal Reserve, because it could be that it is fighting a beast that is much bigger, more dangerous, and has the potential to centralize power over our lives in ways that even the Fed cannot. Tom gives us some indicators to watch for in the coming months, that he says will support his thesis.

Is Tom right? Listen to the episode and decide for yourself.

You can find Tom here, where he hosts a podcast and produces an intensely well-researched and thought out newsletter covering financial and geopolitical issues of the day. He is also active on Twitter/X.

My previous episode with Tom Luongo is here. And I appeared on Tom's podcast a while ago, here.

In this episode, I speak with Dr. Clinton Ohlers, Vice President and Director of Media Relations for SafeBlood, an organization that helps to match donors with recipients in need of blood that does not contain components of an mRNA injection.

We talk about why there is a need for "safe" blood donations, and how SafeBlood works. We also discuss the development of a test to determine whether or not blood has been contaminated by the mRNA product.

We also talk about the impact of censorship and shadow banning, and about how you can help support the mission of SafeBlood, including becoming a member or a donor yourself.

To learn more about SafeBlood, go here.

SafeBlood is on Twitter/X.

The article "Literally Criminal" is here.

And Ed Dowd's book is "'Cause Unknown': The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 & 2022 & 2023."

Previous episodes and posts on the issue of getting mRNA-free blood, and creating a safe blood supply, are here, here, and here.

In this episode, I speak with economist Dale Steinreich about our dysfunctional health-care system (in the US), and about health insurance in particular.

What is wrong with health insurance? Why does it so often seem to operate against the interests of its consumers, rather than for their benefit? Does this represent some kind of failure of the free market? Or is something else at work here?

We go into the nature of health "insurance" in an interventionist marketplace, and the history of how we got here. This is an insightful episode, and you'll come away with a better understanding of why this industry is so dysfunctional.

Dale's original article on the topic is here (audio here). His more recent paper is here.

His review of John Goodman's "Priceless" is here.

In April of 2021, then-Labour-leader Keir Starmer visited the city of Bath on one of those visits where politicians walk around a place and pretend to care about the people who live there.

He wasn’t prepared for what Bath resident, and proprietor of The Raven Pub, Rod Humphris, had to tell him. Humphris gave Starmer a piece of his mind about the destructive and authoritarian lockdowns, and then when the Labour leader tried to take refuge in the pub Humphris owned, he threw him out.

The whole thing is beautiful, and you can see video of it below.

I say we need a lot more people like Rod Humphris. But Humphris doesn’t think that will be enough to address the depth of what has been destroyed, nor the overwhelming power that the government of Britain has over the people who live there.

What will it take? Humphris shares his thoughts in this interview.

The Raven Pub can be found here.

Rod Humphris' fiction books can be found here.

As he mentioned, he is looking for a literary agent who might be friendlier to his perspective than most in the industry. If anyone has any promising leads in this direction, please get in touch with Rod, via The Raven’s website.

I speak with independent journalist Jeremy Hammond, about the upcoming presidential elections, and about the nature of voting, and of the state, generally.

Is it more responsible to refrain from participating in an illegitimate system founded on coercion? Or should we strive to make things better by choosing the lesser of two evils?

Jeremy is the author of several books, including Obstacle to Peace: The US Role in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, and The War on Informed Consent: The Persecution of Dr. Paul Thomas by the Oregon Medical Board (Children’s Health Defense).

You can find his work here.

And as I mentioned in the episode, this is Mises University week. If you agree with Jeremy and myself that combatting economic ignorance is one of the best ways we can fight for freedom, you'll want to check out the Mises Institute, which, in my humble opinion, does the very best job of this of any organization on the planet. You can learn about them, and support them, here.

There has never been a period in my own lifetime when American people have had so little trust in, or regard for, the nation's government. Witnessing the events of the past four-plus years – or indeed, the past couple of weeks – one might rightly declare that we have reached peak clown show in the realm of governance.

So is it time to just cut it loose? Would it be better for states to simply go their own ways, and let the feds continue to flounder? And if so, what are the mechanisms by which they might do this? Would such a move require outright secession, or violent revolution? Or does the very law upon which the nation is founded allow for it?

I pose these questions to Mike Maharrey, National Communications Director for the Tenth Amendment Center.

Mike is also a reporter and analyst for Money Metals.

You can find Mike on Twitter.

He is the co-author of the books "Constitution Owner's Manual: The Real Constitution Politicians Don’t Want You to Know About", and "Nullification 101: An Introduction to the History, Constitutionality, and Practical Applications of Nullification."