In this episode, we examine a proposed shift at the Environmental Protection Agency that would change how the costs and benefits of air pollution rules are calculated—specifically by excluding or minimizing key health benefits such as avoided asthma attacks, hospitalizations, and premature deaths tied to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone exposure.

Change the math, and you change the outcome. If the financial value of protecting human health is excluded from regulatory analysis, pollution appears cheaper to tolerate. The likely result: weaker standards, dirtier air, and heavier burdens on communities living near highways, ports, and industrial facilities.

We explore how cost-benefit methodology shapes environmental policy, why measurement frameworks matter as much as the rule itself, and what it means when economic models sideline human impact.

Methodologies can evolve. Transparency can improve. But zeroing out the value of human life is not innovation. Technology should reduce harm—and policy should measure that harm honestly.

In this episode, we head to the field—where a $900,000 combine goes silent under a darkening sky because of a software lockout.

John Deere’s precision agriculture tools can reduce seed, fertilizer, and fuel inputs with remarkable plant-by-plant accuracy. The efficiency gains are real. But when centralized software control prevents a farmer from restarting critical equipment as a storm rolls in, the value proposition changes fast.

We unpack the tension between high-tech farming and high-stakes dependency. Who owns the machine—and who controls it? That question fuels the broader right-to-repair debate spreading from tractors to EVs and other software-defined products.

Ownership, we argue, must include access to diagnostics, the ability to fix urgent failures, and timely remote resets when minutes matter. Because when harvest windows close, there’s no software update that can bring the crop back.

In this episode, we get hands-on with the 2026 Honda Passport Trailsport to separate substance from styling.

Bold on the outside and refreshingly calm inside, the Passport pairs a proven 3.5-liter V6 with a 10-speed automatic and drive modes tuned for real-world terrain—not marketing buzzwords. The details matter: General Grabber all-terrain tires mounted on 18-inch wheels signal this SUV is built for actual trails and reasonable replacement costs, not just showroom swagger.

With 5,000 pounds of towing capacity and a genuinely cavernous cargo hold, it delivers the confidence and versatility families expect from a midsize SUV. But we also call out where it falls short—its fuel economy, which should be stronger in today’s market.

The 2026 Passport Trailsport is a case study in where rugged meets reasonable—and why capability still wins when it’s grounded in practicality.

Technology is moving faster than the rulebook—and Rivian is betting its future on staying ahead of both.

In this episode, we break down Rivian’s survival playbook: the push to make the R2 affordable, the strategic delay of its Georgia plant, and the decision to build an in-house autonomy stack powered by a custom processor and subscription-based features. If EV demand softens, this layered revenue strategy could keep the lights on.

But we also ask harder questions. What does “hands-free” really mean when drivers still carry legal liability? Do point-to-point autonomy features justify recurring fees? And how much responsibility shifts to the automaker when software becomes the product?

The R2 isn’t just another electric SUV—it’s a test case for whether software-defined vehicles and subscription autonomy can stabilize a volatile EV market.

Because when innovation outruns regulation, strategy becomes survival.

In this episode, we tackle housing affordability through a different lens: employment.

New master-planned cities promise mixed-income neighborhoods, smarter zoning, walkable design, and built-in transit. But even the most thoughtfully designed community collapses without one essential ingredient—jobs. Employers must anchor growth, or affordability becomes a short-lived illusion.

We examine a more immediate and scalable solution: revitalizing existing small and rural towns. Mid-skill industries, expanded broadband, modular and infill housing, and zoning reforms that bring people closer to work and essential services can move the needle faster than building from scratch.

Technology can accelerate construction, improve planning, and connect workers to opportunity. But without economic strategy aligned to local labor markets, innovation alone won’t solve the affordability crisis.

Because in housing, as in mobility, value follows access—and access starts with work.

In this episode, we explore an unexpected revival from the past: chimney sweeps are back in London.

Surging energy prices, wood-burning stove installations, and growing concerns about grid resilience have reignited a 500-year-old trade. But today’s sweeps don’t climb soot-covered flues. They use drones, thermal cameras, and industrial vacuum systems—bringing modern tech to an old-world necessity.

We break down the resilience case for fireplaces as backup heat during outages and winter grid stress. Then we examine the trade-offs: increased PM2.5 exposure, indoor air quality concerns, and the broader public health implications of more households burning solid fuels.

For families relying on wood heat, cleaner-burning fuels, certified stoves, and annual chimney inspections aren’t optional—they’re essential. The comeback of chimney sweeps isn’t nostalgia. It’s a signal about energy insecurity, household preparedness, and how quickly the past can become relevant again.

In this episode, we examine a Detroit startup embedding EEG-style sensors into vehicle headrests to detect drowsiness, seizures, blackouts, and other medical events—potentially before drivers even realize something is wrong.

The safety upside is compelling. Earlier alerts could prevent crashes, reduce fatalities, and give automakers a powerful new differentiator in advanced driver-assistance systems. But adoption hinges on more than innovation.

We break down the cost targets required for mass-market integration, the fine line between helpful safety alerts and the rise of the “nanny car,” and the high-stakes privacy questions surrounding biometric data. If brainwave monitoring becomes standard equipment, insurers and employers will want access. That’s where strong guardrails matter.

For this technology to succeed, it must ship with opt-in architecture, on-device processing, and strict data deletion policies baked into the hardware—not added later as an afterthought.

Because the future of vehicle safety may depend less on what your car sees—and more on what it knows about you.

For this episode, autonomous driving is back in the spotlight—but the comeback isn’t evenly distributed. We examine autonomy’s second act and explain why the hype now looks very different from the first wave.

We begin with Nissan, once a pioneer with the Leaf and now promising a hands-off, eyes-on autonomous system by 2028. But can a bold software roadmap overcome aging core products and an Infiniti brand still searching for relevance? We unpack why advanced driver-assistance systems can’t compensate for weak product cycles—and why execution matters more than ambition.

Then we explore the legal gray zones still surrounding consumer autonomy, from liability questions to weather limitations that continue to constrain robotaxis in dense urban environments.

Finally, we follow the money to where autonomy is gaining real traction: long-haul trucking across the Sun Belt. Predictable highway routes, favorable weather, and labor economics are accelerating deployment in freight long before fully driverless passenger cars become mainstream.

Autonomy isn’t dead. It’s evolving. The real question is who benefits first—and who gets left behind.