“File a patent… today… on an invention you haven’t even seen.” In this episode of Could You Be a Big-Time Manhattan Lawyer?, host Big Bad Babo puts Suits Season 1, Episode 2 (the “patent episode”) under the microscope with two real IP pros: Samar Shah (12-year patent attorney) and Ian Holloway (patent agent + former patent examiner).

What starts as a VC pitch for a $20M pocket-phone prototype (in 2011) spirals into peak-TV patent chaos: same-day filing on a mystery invention, the USPTO apparently responding in 24 hours, an “injunction” detour, a last-ditch interference play (pre‑AIA rules), and a settlement strategy so wild it somehow turns into $400M—powered by one threat: upload the design plans online and flood the market with knockoffs.

If you’ve ever watched legal TV and thought, “that’s… not how patents work,” this breakdown is for you.

What you’ll learn

• Why “go file the patent” without seeing the prototype is a legal and practical nightmare
• What actually happens after filing (receipts, timelines, and why 24-hour USPTO intel is… a stretch)
• The real-world difference between filing, publication (18 months), and examination (often 12–18+ months to first action)
• Why interference proceedings existed (pre‑March 16, 2013) and why they’re basically IP “mutual assured destruction”
• How injunctions and “patent disputes” get mis-framed on TV—and what the correct venues/strategies usually look like
• The business irony of the closer: why “I’ll publish the plans” can nuke exclusivity—and why TV treats it like leverage

Suggested timestamps / segments (copy/paste friendly)

00:00 Intro — The “first and likely last” episode setup
01:20 Meet the contestants: Samar (patent attorney) & Ian (former examiner)
04:05 The $20M prototype… and the associate can’t even see it
07:10 “Go back and file a patent” — what could possibly go wrong
12:05 How many patents have you filed? (The “100” moment)
16:10 Real patent timelines vs. same-day filing fantasy
22:00 USPTO calls in 24 hours?! Let’s talk backlog + reality
27:40 Injunction strategy, courtroom confusion, and why this is messy
33:15 Interference: what it is, why it existed, why everyone loses
39:10 The settlement twist: “We’re putting it online”
45:30 Final verdict: TV law vs. patent law

Chapter breakdown (long-form description structure)

Chapter 1: The Setup — Big-Time Manhattan Energy
A founder, a prototype, VCs, and a lawyer who hasn’t seen the invention.

Chapter 2: The Patent Filing Problem
Why “file it anyway” collapses under basic patent practice (and common sense).

Chapter 3: The Timeline Reality Check
Filing ≠ granted. Receipts, publication, examiner assignment, and why speed-dialing the USPTO is… optimistic.

Chapter 4: Injunctions & Venue Confusion
How the episode blends legal concepts into one dramatic court moment.

Chapter 5: Interference — The Pre‑2013 Plot Device
A real concept used in the most TV way possible.

Chapter 6: The $400M Threat Strategy
Uploading plans, knockoffs, and the weird logic of turning self-destruction into leverage.

Chapter 7: The Final Score
What Suits gets wrong, what it accidentally brushes against, and why real IP work is way less cinematic.

The video game industry tripled real GDP growth from 2011–2021… then shrank 13% from 2021–2024. In this episode of the Patent Strategy Scorecard Podcast, host Samar Shah with Ian Holloway unpack the macro whiplash—and the IP plays that separate winners (Steam, Nintendo) from the rest. We trace the rise of mobile and microtransactions, the TikTok time-steal, app-store taxes, ballooning dev costs, and foreign competition—and map where patents should concentrate across the value chain (creation, cross-platform engines, marketing/discovery, and distribution). We also score Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft, Tencent, and Steam on how closely their filings match tomorrow’s business reality.

What you’ll learn:

Why gaming grew 108% (2011–2021) then reversed: mobile saturation, social-video cannibalization, and deflationary pricing
The five real headwinds: end of mobile user growth, TikTok/Shorts time theft, rising dev costs & timelines, app-store tolls, foreign studios
Bright spots with teeth: AI to cut production cost, AR/VR, Web3 entitlements, cloud gaming, esports + betting
Steam’s shocker: ~$22B revenue with ~350 employees—what that implies for marketplace moats
The value-chain patent map: where filings actually create leverage (and where they don’t
Company snapshots: Nintendo’s exclusives moat, Sony’s console/ARVR bets, Microsoft’s spread (AI/streaming), Tencent’s imaging stack
The 5-factor Patent Scorecard: Coverage, Differentiation, Benchmarking, Exclusion, Foresight

00:00 Intro & Episode Overview
01:18 The 108% Decade: Mobile, Microtransactions, Battle Passes
06:05 The Reversal (2021–2024): −13% and Why It Happened
11:22 TikTok vs. Fortnite: The Time War You Can’t Ignore
15:40 Cost Explosion: AAA Budgets, Longer Timelines, App-Store Taxes
20:55 Foreign Competition & Pricing Deflation (Why $60 Still Hurts)
25:08 Bright Spots: AI, AR/VR, Web3 Items, Cloud, Esports Betting
30:36 The Gaming Value Chain: Where Patents Add Real Leverage
36:12 Steam’s Marketplace Moat (and Why It Prints Cash)
41:10 Company Deep Dives: Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft, Tencent, Steam
49:20 Scorecard: Coverage • Differentiation • Benchmarking • Exclusion • Foresight
55:02 Counsel’s Take: What to File Now (by role: studio, engine, marketplace, marketing)
58:40 Final Thoughts: What Survives the Next Cycle?

Chapter 1: The 108% Decade
How mobile access, F2P, and battle passes created a once-in-a-generation surge.

Chapter 2: The 13% Slide
The five headwinds that flipped growth into contraction—and why it’s not just cyclical.

Chapter 3: The Time War
How short-form video out-targets and out-delivers session satisfaction vs. games.

Chapter 4: Cost, Toll Roads, and Deflation
AAA budgets up, timelines longer, and 30% app-store taxes meet 1990s pricing.

Chapter 5: Bright Spots, Not Silver Bullets
AI for asset generation, AR/VR’s promise, Web3 portability, cloud access, esports betting.

Chapter 6: The Value-Chain Map
Creation → Cross-platform engines → Marketing/Discovery → Distribution: where patents bite.

Chapter 7: Company Playbooks
Nintendo’s exclusives moat; Sony’s console + AR/VR tilt; Microsoft’s broad spread; Tencent’s imaging stack; Steam’s marketplace power.

Chapter 8: The Patent Scorecard
Coverage, Differentiation, Benchmarking, Exclusion, Foresight—who’s aligned with the future?

Chapter 9: Counsel’s Playbook & The Road Ahead
Exact filing priorities for studios, engines, marketplaces, and marketing platforms—and what likely survives the next cycle.

In this episode of the Patent Strategy Scorecard Podcast, host Samar Shah and co-hosts Ian Holloway and Bobby Walling break down Nintendo’s one‑of‑a‑kind approach to gaming, IP, and control—from the 1983 video game crash and lockout chips to the decision that helped create the Sony PlayStation.

We unpack how Nintendo:
Rose from the 1983 crash with lockout chips, strict cartridge rules, and App Store–style 30% cuts decades before Apple
Turned down the CD drive that became the original PlayStation, trading performance and scale for control and anti‑piracy
Built a beloved family and nostalgia brand (Mario, Donkey Kong, Zelda, Wii, Switch) that feels more like LEGO or Louis Vuitton than Microsoft
Enforces its IP aggressively: ROM sites, fan games, mods, Mario Maker troll levels, and the Game Genie case
Treats hardware, accessories, and even classic re‑releases (NES/SNES Classic) as scarce, high‑margin products
Files heavily in controllers, form factor, and UX design—not cutting‑edge graphics, engines, or cloud gaming
Risks ceding the high‑end handheld space to Valve’s Steam Deck by clinging to a niche, underpowered “social console” identity
The episode ends with our Nintendo scorecard: how well their IP strategy covers their base tech, differentiates them, benchmarks against Sony/Microsoft/Valve, and whether they’re structurally locked into being a beloved niche instead of the dominant platform they could have been.

00:00 Introduction and Episode Overview
02:05 Nintendo as a “Second Console”: Niche, Social, and Beloved
06:12 From the 1983 Crash to Lockout Chips and Cartridges
11:40 The CD Drive That Became PlayStation: Nintendo’s Sliding Doors Moment
17:25 Control vs. Opportunity: Cartridges, Anti‑Piracy, and Lost AAA Potential
22:48 Online, Streaming, and Mobile: Why Nintendo Moves Slow by Design
27:33 Brand, Nostalgia, and Santa Claus: Why Nintendo Feels Like LEGO (Not Microsoft)
32:10 NES/SNES Classic, Artificial Scarcity, and Luxury Brand Tactics
37:02 IP Enforcement: ROMs, Fan Games, Mods, and the Game Genie Fight
42:45 Patent Signals: Controllers, Design Patents, and a Niche Hardware Focus
47:58 Steam Deck, Switch, and the Handheld Power Gap
52:30 The Scorecard: Coverage, Differentiation, Benchmarking, Exclusion, Foresight
59:05 Counsel’s Take: What Nintendo Should File Next—and What They’re Leaving on the Table
1:02:40 Final Thoughts: Can Nintendo Ever Be More Than a Niche?

Chapter 1: From Crash to Control
How Nintendo emerged from the 1983 video game crash with a lockout chip–driven cartridge model, strict licensing, and App Store–style economics that reshaped the industry.

Chapter 2: The PlayStation That Got Away
The inside story of Nintendo’s CD‑drive project, why they walked away, and how that decision helped birth the Sony PlayStation—along with a whole missed era of 3D, cinematic, AAA Nintendo hardware.

Chapter 3: Control First, Performance Later (Maybe)
Why Nintendo consistently chooses platform control, profit margins, and family‑friendly curation over raw performance, online services, or broad third‑party ecosystems.

Chapter 4: Brand, Nostalgia, and Luxury Scarcity
Donkey Kong at ShowBiz Pizza, Nintendo Power, N64 flex stories, NES/SNES Classic scarcity—why Nintendo behaves like a luxury / niche brand, and how that clashes with the economics of electronics.

Chapter 5: IP Enforcement as Identity
ROM takedowns, fan game shutdowns, Mario Maker troll levels, mod chip litigation, and the Game Genie saga—how Nintendo’s legal posture mirrors its obsession with protecting a “pure” brand experience.

Chapter 6: Patents as a Window Into Strategy
A portfolio heavy on controllers, handheld form factors, and design patents, light on engines, cloud, and bleeding‑edge hardware—what that says about Nintendo’s ambitions (and blind spots).

Chapter 7: Competitive Benchmarks & the Steam Deck Problem
How Nintendo’s disciplined, high‑allowance filing compares with Sony, Microsoft, and Valve, and why ceding the powerful handheld space to Steam Deck may be the next big missed opportunity.

Chapter 8: The Scorecard & Nintendo’s Future
Our graded scorecard on coverage, differentiation, benchmarking, exclusion power, and strategic foresight—plus the big question: Should Nintendo stay niche, or finally play for the top spot?

In this episode of the Patent Strategy Scorecard Podcast, host Samar Shah and co-host Ian Holloway unpack Microsoft’s Xbox journey, from early price-undercut wins to the Game Pass paradox, massive studio acquisitions (Activision Blizzard, Bethesda, Minecraft), and what the patent portfolio signals about the company’s next move. We walk through the history of console wars (Nintendo → Sony → Microsoft), the economics of exclusives vs. subscriptions, and where Microsoft is currently filing patents (consoles, streaming, AR/VR, and engines). The episode ends with our scorecard: how well Xbox’s IP aligns with forward-looking strategy and whether Microsoft should double down on studios, pivot to a software layer, or write down consoles.

00:00 Introduction and Episode Overview
01:22 A Short History of Console Wars (Atari → Nintendo → Sony)
05:05 Sony’s CD Pivot & Dev Freedom vs. Nintendo Control
08:11 Microsoft’s Entry: Undercutting on Price & Early Momentum
12:04 Engines Change Everything: Unreal/Unity & Cross-Platform Ports
15:48 Sony’s PS4 Strategy: Niche Studios + Consoles at Cost
19:36 Microsoft’s Pivot to “PC in the Living Room” (Kinect) & the Fallout
23:58 Mobile Eats the Living Room: What Xbox Missed
27:40 Why Buy Big? Activision, Bethesda, Minecraft (and the real math)
32:33 The Game Pass Paradox: $80 Discs vs. $10/month Subs
36:55 Patent Signals: Where Microsoft Files (Consoles, Streaming, AR/VR)
42:18 Sony vs. Microsoft vs. Nintendo: Filing Volume & Allowance Rates
47:30 Litigation Signals in a Slowing Market
51:12 Our Scorecard: Coverage, Differentiation, Benchmarking, Exclusion, Foresight
58:40 Counsel’s Take: What to File Now; What to Scale or Sell
1:02:10 Final Thoughts & Xbox’s Most Likely Endgame

Chapter 1: Console Wars 101
How we got here—why Nintendo ceded ground, how Sony seized it, and where Xbox first won.

Chapter 2: The Sony Playbook
From CDs to curated studios: the strategy behind PS dominance and “good enough” hardware at the right price.

Chapter 3: Microsoft’s Left Turn
Kinect, living-room PC, and the cost of misreading the platform shift to mobile.

Chapter 4: Acquisitions at Scale
Why buy Activision/Bethesda/Minecraft—and why exclusivity is harder when the check is $80B.

Chapter 5: The Game Pass Paradox
Subscription math vs. $70–$80 titles; publisher incentives and the path to a bigger pie.

Chapter 6: Patents as a Crystal Ball
Consoles vs. streaming vs. AR/VR: what filing patterns reveal about Microsoft’s real bets.

Chapter 7: Competitive Benchmarks
Sony’s filing surge, Nintendo’s 95% allowance discipline, and what that means for Xbox.

Chapter 8: The Scorecard & Endgame
Does Microsoft’s IP align with its future? Where to double down—and what to let go.

In this episode of the Patent Strategy Scorecard Podcast, hosts Samar Shah and Ian Holloway unpack the Walt Disney Company’s evolution — from a small animation studio to a global empire spanning theme parks, streaming, AR/VR, AI, and advertising.

We explore:

Disney’s early history and rise during the cable bundle era

The dominance of ESPN and its role in shaping cable packages

Disney’s pivot to streaming and the challenges of competing with Netflix and tech giants

The shift from cable to broadband and its industry-wide impact

The enduring value of Disney’s parks division

Disney’s patent strategy across AR/VR, AI, streaming, and advertising

Global distribution of Disney’s patents and how they align with future growth

Key Insight: Disney’s intellectual property (IP) isn’t just about protecting Mickey Mouse—it’s a forward-looking competitive moat driving innovation and market leadership.

If you want to learn how IP and patent strategy can future-proof businesses like Disney (and yours), visit us at outlierpatentattorneys.com

Listen now and gain insight into Disney’s IP playbook, streaming future, and innovation roadmap.

Learn more about building your patent strategy: https://outlierpatentattorneys.com/

In this episode of the Patent Strategy Podcast, hosts Samar Shah and Ian Holloway delve into Netflix's current landscape, exploring its business strategy, market positioning, and the challenges it faces in a competitive streaming environment. They discuss the implications of subscriber growth, the shift towards ad-supported models, and the importance of content recommendations. The conversation also touches on Netflix's patent strategy, comparing it with competitors and evaluating its effectiveness in the evolving media landscape. The hosts conclude with a scorecard assessment of Netflix's patent strategy, highlighting areas for improvement and future opportunities.

Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Overview
06:38 Legacy Media Companies Struggle to Compete
18:42 Exploring an Ad-Supported Model
22:23 International Growth and Targeting Specific Markets
31:15 Engaging Users with Live Events
33:33 The Double-Edged Sword of Sports Content
36:03 Experimenting with Live Events and Content Recommendation Systems
39:19 Reliance on Internal Data Analysis
44:33 Drop in Allowance Rate in 2018
01:04:53 Netflix's Patent Portfolio: Delivering Video Content and User Experience
01:15:43 Lack of Forward-Looking Patents: Advertising and Recommendation Systems
01:17:59 Competitive Position: Behind Amazon and Apple
01:22:00 Missing Opportunities: Excluding Competitors and Anticipating Integration
01:28:12 Improving Netflix's Patent Strategy: Focus on Forward-Looking Areas

Takeaways
Netflix is currently the leading streaming platform with a significant market share.
The company has successfully leveraged data analytics to understand viewer preferences.
Legacy media companies have struggled to adapt to the streaming model, benefiting Netflix.
Subscriber growth is slowing, prompting Netflix to explore new revenue streams.
The shift to an ad-supported model is a significant change for Netflix.
Content recommendations are crucial for increasing viewer engagement and retention.
International expansion presents both opportunities and challenges for Netflix.
Live events and sports could enhance Netflix's ad revenue potential.
Netflix's patent strategy is heavily focused on distribution technology.
There is a need for Netflix to innovate in advertising and recommendation systems.

Keywords
Netflix, patent strategy, business strategy, streaming, media industry, competition, advertising, content recommendations, subscriber growth, international expansion

In this episode, Samar Shah and Ian Holloway discuss the challenges and unique aspects of Spotify's business model. They explore how Spotify differs from other tech companies, the impact of record labels on their profitability, and their efforts to increase revenue through advertising. They also examine Spotify's expansion into podcasts and audiobooks as a way to attract more users and generate more ad inventory. While Spotify faces obstacles in becoming an ad-focused company, they are making strategic moves to position themselves in the audio content space.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Overview

08:02 Spotify's Unique Business Model

15:13 Comparison to Netflix

26:06 Increasing Audio Content Inventory

32:14 Expanding into Podcasts and Audiobooks

48:45 Benchmarking Spotify's Patent Portfolio Against Competitors

58:26 Vertical & Horizontal Integration

01:03:31 Advertising in Spotify's Patent Portfolio

Tune in to see how Samar and Ian will rate Spotify's patent portfolio in view of their business strategy.