War of the Worldviews

Science Vs. Spirituality

De: Leonard Mlodinow, Deepak Chopra

Narrado por: Deepak Chopra MD, Leonard Mlodinow

Two best-selling authors first met in a televised Caltech debate on “the future of God,” one an articulate advocate for spirituality, the other a prominent physicist. This remarkable book is the product of that serendipitous encounter and the contentious - but respectful - clash of worldviews that grew along with their friendship.

In War of the Worldviews these two great thinkers battle over the cosmos, evolution and life, the human brain, and God, probing the fundamental questions that define the human experience.

• How did the universe emerge?
• What is the nature of time?
• What is life?
• Did Darwin go wrong?
• What makes us human?
• What is the connection between mind and brain?
• Is God an illusion?

This extraordinary book will fascinate millions of listeners of science and spirituality alike, as well as anyone who has ever asked themselves, What does it mean that I am alive?

From the Hardcover edition.

©2011 Deepak Chopra, Leonard Mlodinow (P)2011 Random House Audio

Reseñas de la Crítica

“We need a worldview grounded in science that does not deny the richness of human nature and the validity of modes of knowing other than the scientific. If we can bring our spirituality, the richness and wholesomeness of our basic human values, to bear upon the course of science in human society, then the different approaches of science and spirituality will contribute together to the betterment of humanity. This book points the way to such a collaborative endeavor.” (His Holiness the Dalai Lama)

"Deepak Chopra did an excellent job explaining why the all-embracing holistic quantum field suggests a dynamic, alive cosmos. This is an interesting and provocative book which will be read and talked about for a long time to come.” (Hans Peter Duerr, Director Emeritus, Max-Planck-Institute for Physics and Astrophysics)

"Bravo! This delightful book is bound to be the Gold Standard by which all other books on science/spirituality will be measured. Bold, refreshing, lucid, and insightful, this thoughtful collection of essays seeks to unveil the mysterious of our very existence. Is there a purpose to the universe? What is our true role in the cosmos? This book dares to ask some of the deepest, most profound questions about our very existence, and comes up with some surprising, even shocking answers." (Michio Kaku Prof. of Theoretical Physics, City Univ. of NY. Author of the New York Times best sellers Physics of the Future, and Physics of the Impossible.)

Science on the defense

Any additional comments?

I would have enjoyed this book more if Leonard hadn't been so defensive and demeaning toward Deepak. He seemed threatened by Deepak and used sophomoric analogies to, I assume, put Deepak in his place, which is somewhere on the order of a silly child. I think Deepak and his views seem to have hit a source of insecurity with Leonard, which is too bad, because his case would have been stronger and more interesting if he simply presented his good knowledge of his field.

Be aware of Chopra, half of the book is awful

I saw Leonard Mlodinow's name and expected a book with a content of corresponding quality. I didn't knew who is Deepak Chopra and that was the biggest mistake. The book is more like the conversation of a science advocate with lunatic or deliberate charlatan. So you will find not much of interesting science.

Seems like Mlodinow tryed to adjust for lower standarts in argumentation, so he didn't did his best. Chopra is a mistery for me - he makes so much logical mistakes with such a pathos, that I was forced to skip much of his part eventually. I've honestly tryed to follow his logic, but seems he do not use it at all.

Do not buy this book if you are interesting in:

* why people believe in dumb things
* spirituality from a rational point of view
* new science frontiers, religion, hapiness, etc.

Buy this book if you are interesting in:

* additional works of Leonard Mlodinow

Excellent Portrayal of Science and Religion

What made the experience of listening to War of the Worldviews the most enjoyable?

I liked the back and forth by two leaders in their respective fields.

Who was your favorite character and why?

Deepak Chopra and Leonard Mlodinow

What about Deepak Chopra and Leonard Mlodinow ’s performance did you like?

Both respectful of each other's views.

Did you have an extreme reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry?

It made me think.

Any additional comments?

Rather than a one sided viewpoint, the issues were given equal time by both a spiritualist and a scientist. Very entertaining and thought provoking. It was also refreshing to hear Deepak Chopra agree with the evolution and genetics and other scientific knowledge rather than speaking of literal interpretations of ancient texts.

An entertaining debate

The book is curiously entertaining, though Deepak's half is overwhelmingly fallacy-ridden.
But Mlodinow's words make it worth.

Deepak is AWESOME! Other guy can't see the forest.

Deepak is AWESOME! Other guy can't see the forest from the trees. GREAT audiobook.

Not a typical book

I am glad that such a book exists. Usually one reads about something without direct counter-arguments. This way, although also not ideal, one can see two world views explaining same topics and even addressing each other's arguments.
As both authors are also the narrators, this audiobook is much more valuable for me. None of the narrators is probably the best you can listen to, but this way it is much more enjoyable anyway.

A must listen/read

What three words best describe Deepak Chopra and Leonard Mlodinow ’s performance?

Civil, Informed, Debate

Was War of the Worldviews worth the listening time?

Absolutely worth the listen.

Any additional comments?

This isnt a book to convince you one way or the other, but to give insight into the opposing views and perhaps to give some understanding about those who do not share your views.

5 Stars for L. Mlodinow, 1 Star for D. Chopra

Is there anything you would change about this book?

Find somebody else to represent the spiritual world. The views that Chopra presents are so incredibly dull and full of obvious mistakes and arguments that have been torn apart for years by many authors. It is really painful to listen to his chapters. The mix of naivety and just obnoxious ignorance makes it unbearable for any listener. There is nothing interesting or creative that he has to offer just a bunch of irrational opinions backed up by nothing and I wasn't expecting scientific evidence for the spiritual side but at least a coherent in itself logical argument.

Would you be willing to try another book from Leonard Mlodinow and Deepak Chopra ? Why or why not?

I really liked the drunkards walk from L. Mlodinov and I will stay clear of D. Chopra

Unique way to listen in on the debate

I appreciated the fair and respectful structure of the book with each person taking turns and responding to the other without being rude or making personal attacks. Oddly I came to the conclusion that they agree on a lot. I am a scientific minded person but found Deepak's essays compelling. Yet I agreed with Leonard that they are not quite enough. Yet I agree with Deepak that we should hold ourselves to a higher standard and sometimes the "materialistic" view allows us to avoid the hard work of self actualization. So I concluded for myself that we need science to be what it is - and we need humans to want more than what science offers. The debate rages on...in this book respectfully.

Meh.

I'm not sure what I was thinking when I bought this book, maybe a chance to hear some new perspective on big questions.

I left this one feeling disappointed on both sides, Mlodinow for not putting the hammer down harder, and Chopra for dwelling on his straw man arguments and offering up the incessant lists. When Chopra starts on a list, he really loses me, the book is no longer about world view, its a textbook for his brand of snake oil.

Chopra also falls into the trap of arguing against himself repeatedly throughout, using examples that clearly illustrate Leonard's point, then twisting them around to support magical thoughts that are clearly unrelated.

Mlodinow does too much floating around, it seemed like he doesn't want to really tear down Chopra's arguments as directly as Chopra does his. Maybe to keep the book moving along?

Mlodinow often rushes his reading, and Chopra's often wanders into a droning attempt at hypnotism, as far as I can tell.

It's not terrible, it was interesting to hear another point of view from where I stand, I just expected a little more from both sides.