The Sagan Conspiracy

NASA's Untold Plot to Suppress the People's Scientist's Theory of Ancient Aliens

De: Donald L. Zygutis

Narrado por: Mike Chamberlain

Duración: 6 h y 51 m

Resumen del Editor

Mainstream SETI scientists and ancient alien theorists don't agree on much, but one opinion they share is that the undisputed authority on the possibility of alien existence was the late Carl Sagan (1934-1996), whose voluminous writings on the subject have had a profound influence on ETI research.

But how many Carl Sagan fans know that while the renowned scientist was at Stanford University, he produced a controversial paper, funded by a NASA research grant, that concludes that ancient alien intervention may have sparked human civilization? Author Donald L. Zygutis lays out a compelling case that points to a cover-up by the Pentagon and NASA, who may have buried it soon after it was written. How significant is the Stanford paper? The answer may lie in another question: How would a science-backed theory and search strategy to guide the discovery of alien artifacts among our own ancient civilizations impact the worldwide institutions of government, religion, and culture?

©2016 Donald L. Zygutis (P)2016 Tantor

༆𝕎ℍ𝔸𝕋 ?????

𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙞𝙣𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙜𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙣 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙘𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙡𝙮 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙣𝙩 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙘𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙖𝙣𝙛 𝙥𝙖𝙧 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙨𝙚 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙬𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙖 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙤𝙨𝙩 𝙪𝙣𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙣 𝙮𝙚𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙤𝙨𝙩 𝙚𝙭𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙙 𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙣𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙖 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙝𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙙. 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙐𝙁𝙊 & 𝙐𝘼𝙋 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙥𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙛𝙖𝙨𝙘𝙞𝙣𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜. 𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙨𝙚 𝙚𝙭𝙩𝙧𝙖 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙗𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙨 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙝𝙤𝙥𝙥𝙞𝙢𝙜 𝙞𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙡𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙥𝙞𝙘𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙞𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙙𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙨 𝙖𝙩 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙞𝙩 𝙨𝙚𝙚𝙢𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙞𝙩𝙨 𝙖𝙡𝙢𝙤𝙨𝙩 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙘𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙧𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙙 𝙅𝙚𝙧𝙪𝙨𝙖𝙡𝙚𝙢 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙉𝙖𝙯𝙖𝙧𝙚𝙩𝙝 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙪𝙣𝙘𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙨𝙥𝙞𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙨 (𝙙𝙚𝙢𝙤𝙣𝙨) 𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙝𝙤𝙥𝙥𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙞𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚𝙨 𝙡𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙥𝙞𝙘𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙞𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙙𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙧𝙚𝙚𝙠 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙤𝙠 𝙤𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙬𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙜𝙤 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙢𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙫𝙚𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙖𝙨 𝙛𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙝𝙖𝙡𝙛 𝙢𝙖𝙣 𝙝𝙖𝙡𝙛 𝙗𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙩𝙨 𝙖𝙢𝙙 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙂𝙤𝙙𝙨... 𝙁𝙤𝙡𝙠𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙐𝙁𝙊 𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙣𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙖 𝙩𝙤𝙙𝙖𝙮 𝙞𝙨 𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙣. 𝙎𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙮𝙚𝙧𝙨,𝙙𝙞𝙛𝙛𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙙𝙚𝙘𝙚𝙥𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙣𝙩 𝙗𝙪𝙩 𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙘 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙙𝙚𝙢𝙤𝙣𝙞𝙘 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙗𝙖𝙘𝙠. 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙤𝙣𝙡𝙮 𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙚𝙛𝙛𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙖𝙙𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙢 𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙖 𝙢𝙖𝙣 𝙣𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙅𝙚𝙨𝙪𝙨. 𝙄𝙢 𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙝𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙙 𝙤𝙛 𝙝𝙞𝙢. 𝙇𝙤𝙤𝙠 𝙩𝙤 𝙝𝙞𝙢 𝙣𝙤𝙬. 𝙏𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙨 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙖𝙣𝙨𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙨. 𝙅𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙨𝙖𝙮𝙞𝙣 '

Conspiracy

Repeats himself ALOT! Yes, equal and consistency science should be applied...

Conspiracies are too easily postulated, cannot be proven nor disproven, and stimulate internal fears.

Might work for Presidential elections... lol

Quite Intriguing Especially if You Are a Sagan Fan

So repetitive, but intriguing for sure. I'm going to contact the author for further discussions. Very good.

interesting, good for a short book

narration was good, and it's an interesting topic with valid points. the only downside is the amount of times the author repeats his disdain for NASA and Drake while praising Sagan.

Finally got to hear this.

It is a good addition to the Plus catalog. I’ve wanted to listen to it but not wanted to pay for it. My curiosity is satisfied. Thanks Audible.

Ultra repetitive

The author restates his opinion over and over and over and over. It is repetitive and not supported by much evidence. Also the author published this prior to much of the recent UAP interest from congress and AARO. Finally what the heck is he thinking? Aliens once visited Earth in the past… but you are bat shit crazy to believe they are still visiting us today? Totally illogical. Why would they stop showing an interest in us?

Finally the truth Carl Sagan and ancient aliens.

Finally the truth Carl Sagan , and the Stanford paper can be put in the proper perspective, he can be remembered for this ancient aliens, which NASA, the pentegon have tried to suppress.

Just add Sagan

Hard to believe no one will debate this guy…quite full of himself. Just because you put a bunch of random things out there doesn’t mean the science community has to take you seriously. Also, adding the word conspiracy does you no favors. I was interested in this geek because it was about Sagan and I thought something might be here…I was wrong. Skip this one.

Long and boring

I finished this book for only one reason so I can give it a one star. it’s very long on talk and very short on substance

Repeat on repeat

The book is basically the same two graphs on loop front to back. If anyone he sent it to didn’t respond it’s because it’s terrible writing about his axe grinding and pitiful self-aggrandizing . What a waste of time.