The President and the Assassin

McKinley, Terror, and Empire at the Dawn of the American Century

De: Scott Miller

Narrado por: Arthur Morey

In 1901, as America tallied its gains from a period of unprecedented imperial expansion, an assassin's bullet shattered the nation's confidence. The shocking murder of President William McKinley threw into stark relief the emerging new world order of what would come to be known as the American Century. The President and the Assassin is the story of the momentous years leading up to that event, and of the very different paths that brought together two of the most compelling figures of the era: President William McKinley and Leon Czolgosz, the anarchist who murdered him. The two men seemed to live in eerily parallel Americas. McKinley was to his contemporaries an enigma, a president whose conflicted feelings about imperialism reflected the country's own. Under its popular Republican commander-in-chief, the United States was undergoing an uneasy transition from a simple agrarian society to an industrial powerhouse spreading its influence overseas by force of arms. Czolgosz was on the losing end of the economic changes taking place---a first-generation Polish immigrant and factory worker sickened by a government that seemed focused solely on making the rich richer. With a deft narrative hand, journalist Scott Miller chronicles how these two men, each pursuing what he considered the right and honorable path, collided in violence at the 1901 Pan-American Exposition in Buffalo, New York. Along the way, listeners meet a veritable who's who of turn-of-the-century America: John Hay, McKinley's visionary secretary of state, whose diplomatic efforts paved the way for a half century of Western exploitation of China; Emma Goldman, the radical anarchist whose incendiary rhetoric inspired Czolgosz to dare the unthinkable; and Theodore Roosevelt, the vainglorious vice president whose 1898 charge up San Juan Hill in Cuba is but one of many thrilling military adventures recounted here.

©2011 Scott Miller (P)2011 Tantor

Reseñas de la Crítica

"This is a wildly complex and significant period in American history, and Miller does a solid job of attending to the many boiling pots on the stove." ( Kirkus)

Great look back into 19th Century America.

What made the experience of listening to The President and the Assassin the most enjoyable?

Learning about a period in history I was not as familiar with.

What was one of the most memorable moments of The President and the Assassin?

The cause and consequence of the Spanish American War on the shaping of the United States as a world power as the 20th century began. Also the role that the anarchists played in society at the time and their influence on the labor unions that would become more prevalent in the 1920's and 1930's.

Which scene was your favorite?

How William McKinley did not overact the sinking of the USS Main and his more global view of America's involvement not only in the battle in Cuba but our military involvement in the Pacific.

Did you have an extreme reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry?

It was sad to read about how the assassin who in so many ways was delusional and insignificant played such a vital role in shaping the history of the United States for the rest of the 20th century.

Any additional comments?

This was a very enjoyable listen.

Very Enlightening

I’ve been a “presidents nerd” for as long as I can remember. There have been millions of pages written about the Lincoln and Kennedy assassinations, but very few about McKinley (and Garfield). This book did an amazing job of covering the life stories of both McKinley and his assassin, as well as tying in everything that was going on in turn-of-the-century America; to the point that even as an amateur historian, I learned a lot from this book that I never knew before.

Plus I finally learned how to pronounce “Czolgosz”

Much bigger (and better) than the title

Not only does this book cover the assassination of McKinley, it offers a brilliant glimpse into the grander acts of violence which led up to it. At he end of the 19th century, the concepts of anarchy and Imperialism clash as the U.S. rushes headlong into its role as an international power. McKinley evolves from a Civil War vet determined to avoid another war to the leader of a colonizing power, subjugating peoples for the sake of big business. His assassin's evolution is also well charted, revealing the powerlessness of our working poor. Overall one of the best books on this period of American history.

An Ideal History Book for the Audio Format

This turned out to be one of the best audiobooks I???ve bought. A popular history, it covers the McKinley presidency, beginning with the crucial defeat of the agrarian-labor populist Bryant by means of a truly paradigmatic coalition of the country???s capitalists (including unprecedented fund-raising, advertising, and even threats by owners to close factories and eliminate jobs en mass if Bryant won). As the author rightly argues, the subsequent years of the McKinley administration present modern America in prototype. With technology, finance, and industry expanding to the point of overproduction, the nation bungles its way into the Cuban revolution and then the Spanish American War, which ineluctably evolves into an explicit grab for the markets and resources of our own backyard empire. This shift from a traditional isolationism erupts with an alarming outpouring of jingoism, mass enthusiasm, military opportunism, and patriotic fervor. The song ???Stars and Stripes Forever??? and the Pledge of Allegiance (written by a magazine PR copywriter) are among the artifacts of this period. While the author is sympathetic to the amiable McKinley in many ways and alert to the complexities of American expansionism, he is equally lucid about the labor and racial issues of the day. The best and most interesting part of the book is his treatment of McKinley???s assassin as a second protagonist with nearly equal time. This allows a fascinating history of turn-of-the-century labor anarchism and urban ???terrorism,??? from the Haymarket Seven to the heirs of Emma Goldman. There???s a bit of whiplash as sections move back and forth between the two protagonists and narrative lines. But it is easy to follow, rich with anecdote, and holds together a remarkable amount of historical material. While I am not judging the book???s scholarship or originality, it makes an excellent, informative, and even suspenseful history in audio form, and very well read.

Let Me Down

I came into this book hoping for a look at McKinley and his assassin. Unfortunately this book was unfocused I understand that with a historical look at the event, that you have to step back and look at the life of the individuals in question. But the author would start with McKinley or Czolgosz and then move further into events that I felt were not relevant. I was hoping at a deeper look into the personal lives of these two men, instead the story's main focus was on McKinley's Geo-political achievement's and the Anarchist movement of the late 1800's. I do appreciate the history lesson, but as I said I wanted more time to get to know these two men and also the days up to and following the event in greater detail. As for the performance I enjoyed Mr. Morey, he did a great job and I had no issues with his voice or how he read the subject matter. This book wasn't for me, I hope that my review helps and that if you are looking for the story that is told here that you enjoy it.

Then and now

Like many Americans I really didn't know a lot about the McKinley assassination. So a lot of the facts were surprising. But even more enlightening were the parallels between life in America then and life in America now. There was fear of immigrants, terrorism and concerns about America's place on the world stage, especially when it came to trade. It is hard to read this book and not realize that not a lot is changed from then to now.

One of my favorites yet!!

This was not a biography of a person but rather more of a timeography as it was a very interesting and detailed look at that time.. in life and politics before during and after McKinley was assassinated.
Highly recommend!

compelling and focused history

I dispute the reviewer claiming the title is inaccurate, and I'm surprised some others found the chronology confusing. There are two timelines that proceed in a linear fashion; one centered around McKinnley's presidency, the other on the anarchist movement and Czolgosz's life in the US. Miller jumps back in forth in time when alternating these lines, but I found it easy to follow after becoming accustomed to it.

Apparently one reviewer was bothered by the fact this book isn't solely about the personal lives of the two subjects. It is true that, while most of the book is focused on these two men, there's ample detail of events they didn't witness (e.g. Battle of Manilla Bay, Haymarket Riot). It is after all a history book, not a novel, and I found such contextual info very well narrated and essential to understanding the decisions these men made.

Miller's relatively short book is very consise and focused. Almost every chapter is about either imperialism or the treatment of workers in the guilded age. It seemed pretty unbiased to me. Strongly recommended for those not well read in McKinnley's presidency.

A great account of McKinley’s presidency

This was a thorough and detailed account of McKinley’s presidency and the hardships and mental decline of his killer.

Fascinating, complex history

Scott Miller has written a well-researched, in-depth history of a time that seems similar to our own. There are really two (maybe three) books here -- that's a compliment and a criticism. He tells the story of anarchism in the late 1800s, with the Haymarket incident and Emma Goldman, as a way to explain the assassin. And tales of the McKinley administration, with the War of 1812 alone, are rich enough to fill several volumes.

I really have enjoyed the book, so I don't want to discourage anyone from reading it, but listening to the Audible edition, I've found the author's organization of the book jarring at times, moving from the 1870s to the 1890s and back again. That might just be a quibble if you're reading the print version. It isn't too jarring to continue, and I'm not sure how he would've avoided it, but fair warning if you'd like a linear storyline.

I might've preferred the print version, too, just to see footnotes, but I love footnotes, and not everyone is like me (hey, the print version may not even have footnotes, for all I know).

They're all great stories, and if you don't know much about this period of our history, or even if you do, you'll enjoy Miller's take on it. It gave me a much better understanding of Teddy Roosevelt, too, and of why the 20th century proceeded as it did.

But beware if you're not crazy for small, interesting nuggets of history. I love 'em, and I do like this book.