The Myth of the Framework

In Defence of Science and Rationality

De: Karl Popper

Narrado por: Martyn Swain

Duración: 8 h y 30 m

Resumen del Editor

In a career spanning 60 years, Sir Karl Popper has made some of the most important contributions to the 20th century discussion of science and rationality. The Myth of the Framework is a collection of some of Popper's most important material on this subject.

Sir Karl discusses such issues as the aims of science, the role that it plays in our civilization, the moral responsibility of the scientist, the structure of history and the perennial choice between reason and revolution. In doing so, he attacks intellectual fashions (like positivism) that exaggerate what science and rationality have done, as well as intellectual fashions (like relativism) that denigrate what science and rationality can do. Scientific knowledge, according to Popper, is one of the most rational and creative of human achievements, but it is also inherently fallible and subject to revision.

In place of intellectual fashions, Popper offers his own critical rationalism - a view that he regards both as a theory of knowledge and as an attitude towards human life, human morals and democracy.

There are nine essays in this collection: 'The Rationality of Scientific Revolutions'; 'The Myth of the Framework'; 'Reason or Revolution'; 'Science: Problems, Aims and Responsibilities'; 'Philosophy and Physics'; 'The Moral Responsibility of the Scientist'; 'A Pluralist Approach to the Philosophy of History'; 'Models, Instruments, and Truth'; 'Epistemology and Industrialization'. In his Introduction, he writes: ‘All, or almost all, the papers collected in this volume are written to defend rationality and rational criticism. It is a way of thinking, and even a way of living: a readiness to listen to critical arguments, to search for one’s own mistakes, and to learn from them. It is, fundamentally, an attitude that I have tried to formulate (perhaps first in 1932) in the following two lines: ‘I may be wrong and you may be right, and by an effort, we may get nearer to the truth.’ This is vintage Karl Popper.

©1994 Estate of Sir Karl Popper (P)2021 Ukemi Productions Ltd

Heavy

This book is very heavy for the common mind. It has a clear narrative, but I had a hard time finishing this one as you need a great deal of focus on it. The vocabulary is not the easiest. The narrator, doesn't seem to make it easier, but from an academic mind point of view, and for the sake of really understanding Mr. Karl, this needs to be read instead of listening.

wonderful ideas clearly stated, so-so reading

I loved the content. Popper highlights features of the science of philosophy that matter, that seem fundamental, that distinguish differences in basic approaches to knowledge between Plato, Descartes, Bacon, and Einstein. Sometimes the text lacks specifics to make the ideas more tangible.

The reader has a wonderful, mellifluous voice that is a pleasure to hear, but. He often. Stops in the middle. Of sentences. And the pauses can seem to last.... Unreasonably long. Play at 1.25x and you're okay. Sorry, Martin.