Mudwoman

De: Joyce Carol Oates

Narrado por: Susan Ericksen

“Oates is just a fearless writer…with her brave heart and her impossibly lush and dead-on imaginative powers.”
—Los Angeles Times

“[An] extraordinarily intense, racking, and resonant novel.”
—Booklist (starred review)

One of the most acclaimed writers in the world today, the inimitable Joyce Carol Oates follows up her searing, New York Times bestselling memoir, A Widow’s Story, with an extraordinary new work of fiction. Mudwoman is a riveting psychological thriller, taut with dark suspense, that explores the high price of repression in the life of a respected university president teetering on the precipice of a nervous breakdown. Like Daphne DuMaurier’s gothic masterwork, Rebecca, and the classic ghost story, The Turn of the Screw, by Henry James, Oates’s Mudwoman is a chilling page-turner that hinges on the power of the imagination and the blurry lines between the real and the invented—and it stands tall among the author’s most powerful and beloved works, including The Falls, The Gravedigger’s Daughter, and We Were the Mulvaneys.

Vivid and engrossing

Although the narrator was a bit more dramatic than I thought was needed, this is a beautifully written, vivid story.

Difficult to listen to a broken life

I found it sad and difficult to listen to Mudgirl/Mudwoman lurking, unhealed, throughout the book. I wanted so much for her to take more responsibility for her life and attempt to truly address the psychological darkness that eroded her personal happiness. Joyce Carol Oates is clearly a talented author and the book was well read.

I Couldn't Have Been More Disappointed

This book wasn???t for you, but who do you think might enjoy it more?

The only people who might enjoy it is if they are a big Oates fan.

Has Mudwoman turned you off from other books in this genre?

I have learned to read all of the reviews before buying a book after being totally disappointed in this book.

Any additional comments?

As a great lover of mysteries, I decided to take a break, and read a different genre. I thought it would be nice to read a female author. Oates has left me frustrated with Mudwoman. I kept thinking that M R would get her act together, but, unlike her intellectual level, her emotional level is that of a 20 year old. I found the story a bit confusing and it seemed to go in circle, rather than resolving matters. There are too many wonderful books to be read, but this is not one of them.

Overly Detailed

What would have made Mudwoman better?

It was just too detailed with very little substance. I found it a difficult listen and could not get into the story. I gave up after about 8 chapters, I felt like I wasted my money on this one. I think the author just tried too hard to explain every little detail, it just didn't work for me.

Would you be willing to try another book from Joyce Carol Oates? Why or why not?

I'm not sure.

What didn’t you like about Susan Ericksen’s performance?

I'm not sure there was that much bad about her performance, I think it was just the material she had to work with that made her performance boring.

What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?

It made me sleepy, every time I tried to listen to it I wanted to go to sleep.

Any additional comments?

Very disappointing.

brilliant writing but disappointed

What did you like best about Mudwoman? What did you like least?

this author is gifted...her vocabulary and use of language is unparallelled. the reader was animated and easy to listen to. you could see the characters thru her

Would you ever listen to anything by Joyce Carol Oates again?

yes. usually very insightful

What about Susan Ericksen’s performance did you like?

her enthusiasm and use of accents and animation

Do you think Mudwoman needs a follow-up book? Why or why not?

definetly hope there is one because i hated the ending... thought i forgot to download a part.

Any additional comments?

very abrupt ending... makes me think i missed something... something important. other than a victory of sorts for the main character, i didn't feel like she was strong enough to avoid the demons that haunted her going foward.

I would not use a credit

What would have made Mudwoman better?

A better story line. The author could have accomplished the end result in 1/4 of the time. There could have been more substance present. The attempt to include events of 9/11 seemed a bit contrived. The story had choppy transitions for no apparent reason. I felt as if the amount of time the "reader" invested should have yielded more depth of character, and more of a reason to have engaged in reading this book. The premise was interesting, but, the book did not seem to deliver. There were moments it seemed to come close, but the author seemed to veer from these.

What was most disappointing about Joyce Carol Oates’s story?

It offered tremendous potential to explore the hidden psyche of the main character but failed to deliver.

Any additional comments?

The narration was excellent. I will seek this performer/reader out in the future.

painful

What disappointed you about Mudwoman?

Complete lack of clarity in the narrative, despite some beautiful and insightful prose.

What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?

I went from hopeful to patient to miserable as the story remained dreamlike, like the mud. Watching the character stumble through didn't provide any satisfaction.

Descent Into Madness or Political Treatise?

Intrigued by the title and description of the book, I bought it. I then spent nearly 20 hours confused by the plot, which never really went anywhere. Meredith Ruth Neukirchen, known as MR, is the protagonist of this novel. Abandoned as a child, she slips on the name of her sister (for reasons we never entirely grasp) when she is saved, lives as a foster child under that name, gets adopted and is renamed for the dead child of otherwise seemingly decent Quaker parents, grows up and becomes the president of a well known university. Established in that position, we spend a year in that present space of time going back and forth into her life through dreams or memories. At times we have trouble distinguishing the past and the present. We take long trips into political jargon through her mind and the conversations of her colleagues. We learn about some secret lover that she maintains for 20 years; a story line never really resolved. We learn about her biological mother and piece by piece we watch MR go from the mud, at age 3, to the university presidency at age 40.

We figure out that MR is intelligent and at one time athletic. We also figure out that she is perceived as ugly, a notion she totally buys into. We want to believe she has a kind and generous spirit, but Oates doesn't ever quite push us over the edge onto firm ground where this is concerned. The conflict we get with her intelligence is that she never really uses it to assess herself and by the age of 40, and quite successful, we figure MR really needs to "get over it." Or at least get counseling. Instead she prefers to wander listlessly through her mind and fails to take any time to take care of herself or to even enjoy life outside of work. She's really only half a person. It was really hard for me to be sympathetic toward her. But I wanted to be.

The most enjoyable parts of the book were the memories where I felt we got a better sense of MR viewing and learning about the world, and to a lesser extent, learning to trust people. But she never really enters life in that fashion, even with the secret lover. When she ultimately has a breakdown, primarily due to exhaustion, she returns home and it is here that we dare to hope that MR grows up. But in the 7 hours it takes for her to drive from her childhood home where she has temporarily stayed with a father she adores, she makes two wrong decisions which land her almost exactly where she was when she had the breakdown three months earlier. We are left in the in the last two minutes of the book wondering if she has inherited madness from her biological mother or perhaps learned it from her adoptive mother - which is another vague story line. I mean let's face it. Who names a newly adopted child after a biological dead one and gives the new child the same birthdate as the dead one? That's just plain nuts. Is this the secret that all Neukirchens fail to avoid - blood relatives or not? This is suggested to us throughout the novel.

I continued to read the book in spite of my frustration because I wanted to find out if MR just slips off the knife edge into madness. I wanted her to become solid instead of vapor whether that meant fully present or fully crazy in her life. I couldn't stand the vacillation between the two. But there is never resolution. If you want to read a book about a woman going mad, The Yellow Wallpaper does a much better job and does it in 30 minutes.

Susan Ericksen, as usual, does a fabulous job reading the title and it's too bad her talent is wasted on a book like this.

If you like rambling novels that teeter back and forth in confused, long winded passages, this book is for you. Otherwise, skip it and move on.

Doesn't follow through/To many catastrophies

With out giving anything away, something horrendoeus happened to a gentleman at the president of the colleges house but the consequences or inquiry were just ignored by the author. Did the author maybe want to mention something more and ran out of space???

It is unbelieveable for so many misgivings to happen to one person.

The reader of this story was very much an over actor. I found myself rolling my eyes at times.

With the reputation of this author, I expected more.

Horrible

What could have made this a 4 or 5-star listening experience for you?

Confusing and weak storyline. I spent more time being confused and lost with this horrible storyline. The worst book I've every read.

Would you listen to another book narrated by Susan Ericksen?

yes

What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?

confusion, disappointment.