Klan War

Ulysses S. Grant and the Battle to Save Reconstruction

De: Fergus M. Bordewich

Narrado por: Landon Woodson

A NEW YORKER BEST BOOK OF THE YEAR • A stunning history of the first national anti-terrorist campaign waged on American soil—when Ulysses S. Grant wielded the power of the federal government to dismantle the KKK

The Ku Klux Klan, which celebrated historian Fergus Bordewich defines as “the first organized terrorist movement in American history,” rose from the ashes of the Civil War. At its peak in the early 1870s, the Klan boasted many tens of thousands of members, no small number of them landowners, lawmen, doctors, journalists, and churchmen, as well as future governors and congressmen. And their mission was to obliterate the muscular democratic power of newly emancipated Black Americans and their white allies, often by the most horrifying means imaginable.

To repel the virulent tidal wave of violence, President Ulysses S. Grant waged a two-term battle against both armed Southern enemies of Reconstruction and Northern politicians seduced by visions of postwar conciliation, testing the limits of the federal government in determining the extent of states’ rights. In this book, Bordewich transports us to the front lines, in the hamlets of the former Confederate States and in the marble corridors of Congress, reviving an unsung generation of grassroots Black leaders and key figures such as crusading Missouri senator Carl Schurz, who sacrificed the rights of Black Americans in the name of political “reform,” and the ruthless former slave trader and Klan leader Nathan Bedford Forrest.

Klan War is a bold and bracing record of America’s past that reveals the bloody, Reconstruction-era roots of present-day battles to protect the ballot box and stamp out resurgent white supremacist ideologies.

Ferocious Savagery

Eye opening for the cruelty displayed at the time. And the still pernicious mentality & ideology that is still very much a part of certain segments of the American white population today.

A Excellent Summary of Sad Events

This book provided a concise account of Reconstruction and its subsequent failure. I found it particularly interesting how the Radical Republican leadership destroyed itself with loss of will and in-fighting.

Had Thaddeus Stevens lived longer, if Hannibal Hamlin were still vice president after 1864, one wonders if Reconstruction would have had greater success in postwar America.

Well written.

Extraordinarily well researched and organized. Rasy to read or listen to. And like Congress at War, this book opens up a part of history that is generally disguised or ignored.

a great but depressing book

This well-written & deeply researched (for a popular history) book provides a superb slap-in-the-face to politicians & wannabe white supremacists bent of whitewashing American history, so that contemporary white children aren't made to feel guilty or uncomfortable about the actions of some of their ancestors. The fight against black former slaves (& freedmen) & against both Southern & Northern (in the South) advocates of equality was a pure, unadulterated horror show. The narrative of which was submerged in the subsequent 100 years by the Lost Cause myth & by Northern indifference. I found the book very enlightening but sometimes a hard read as atrocity after atrocity was related by the author. But still worthy of reading. The author also shows, as other books have, that in some ways Reconstruction in the south was doomed from its birth, despite the best efforts of lots of whites & blacks, north & south. And that while the Grant Administration in general & President Grant in particular tried hard to sustain some kind of positive effort, the Union occupation of the South was too light, scattered & isolated to do much good defending black rights & fighting off local white elites, the Klan & other copycats. So that the 1876 election compromise doesn't come as a surprise. Despite what I said above, this book is not meant to be a political document for our times, for the likes of DeSantis & his ilk. This book will stand on its own long after that reactionary wave is past (I hope).

Good, not great

As a history scholar that studied it and political science, and focused on the civil war and reconstruction, there are a lot of pertinent details missing. It is still a worthwhile read/listen.