American Colossus
The Triumph of Capitalism, 1865-1900
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Obtén 3 meses por US$0.99 al mes
Exclusivo para miembros Prime: ¿Nuevo en Audible? Obtén 2 audiolibros gratis con tu prueba.
Compra ahora por $27.00
-
Narrado por:
-
Robertson Dean
-
De:
-
H. W. Brands
The years between the Civil War and the end of the nineteenth century saw the wholesale transformation of America from a land of small farmers and small businessmen into an industrial giant. Driven by unfathomably wealthy and powerful businessmen like J. P. Morgan, Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, armies of workers, both male and female, were harnessed to a new vision of massive industry. A society rooted in the soil became one based in cities, and legions of immigrants were drawn to American shores. What’s more, in accomplishing its revolution, capitalism threatened to eclipse American democracy. “What do I care about the law?” bellowed Cornelius Vanderbilt. “Hain’t I got the power?” He did, and with it he and the other capitalists reshaped every aspect of American life. In American Colossus, H.W. Brands portrays the emergence, in a remarkably short time, of a recognizably modern America.
The capitalist revolution left not a single area or aspect of American life untouched. It roared across the South, wrenching that region from its feudal past and integrating the southern economy into the national one. It burst over the West, dictating the destruction of Native American economies and peoples, driving the exploitation of natural resources, and making the frontier of settlement a business frontier as well. It crashed across the urban landscape of the East and North, turning cities into engines of wealth and poverty, opulence and squalor. It swamped the politics of an earlier era, capturing one major party and half of the other, inspiring the creation of a third party and determining the issues over which all three waged some of the bitterest battles in American history.
Brands’s spellbinding narrative beautifully depicts the oil gushers of western Pennsylvania, the rise, in Chicago, of the first skyscraper, the exploration of the Colorado River, the cattle drives of the West, and the early passionate sparks of union life. By 1900 the America he portrays is wealthier than ever, yet prosperity is precarious, inequality rampant, and democracy stretched thin. American Colossus is an unforgettable portrait of the years when the contest between capitalism and democracy was at its sharpest, and capitalism triumphed.
Los oyentes también disfrutaron:
Featured Article: The Gilded Age in History and Fiction
While fans of Julian Fellowes’s Gilded Age may be gagging on the luxurious costumes and sumptuous sets, part of the fun is sorting out fact from fiction in the HBO period drama. With a mix of invented characters and actual historical figures—such as society queen Caroline Astor and African American newspaper editor and civil rights leader T. Thomas Fortune—enthusiasts have plenty of resources available so they can learn the truth about the extravagant era when wealthy railroad magnates and other arrivistes were upending late 19th-century New York City society and culture.
Las personas que vieron esto también vieron:
Great Narrative History
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
content
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
I think many are put off but the use of "capitalism" v. "democracy" and I agree that nothing could ever be so simplified (and our system of government, while flawed, is far more democratic now than it was in 1864). But I think in context it works because the point is explaining how this concept of capitalism sort of took over the country. Capitalism wasn't new, of course, but the US did drastically change between 1865 and 1895 and an event like the Civil War was probably more of a byproduct of the change than a cause of it.
It did have its laws. I felt more time could have been spent on certain titans like JP Morgan. And after thorough introduction of the likes of Rockefeller and Carnegie they are sort of dropped for awhile. Part of the meandering narrative is that things do seem to sort of get lost in the fray. But a great many wonderful books have been devoted to those people.
It was an interesting topic. Some parts were better than others. But I really think it is worth it overall.
Differnt but Interesting
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
The book is corrupted, however, by a pervasive bias against free enterprise. I listened attentively, but I don’t believe Brands ever defines “democracy,” which his narrative frames as the antithesis of capitalism—which he likewise never defines. As far as I can tell, his implicit definition of “democracy” is akin to “democratic socialism”-in other words, authoritarian governmental control of economic activity. That would be a true binary. But there is no true binary between capitalism—free economic activity—and American democracy, with its foundational restraints on governmental interference with freedom.
Tellingly, the only capitalists Brands seems to have heard of are a handful of industrial titans, for he never alludes to the millions upon millions of American capitalists who operated prosperous small businesses during the period treated and built a thriving middle-class.
Throughout the long narrative, one almost hears foreboding music when the word “capitalism” appears, as it only appears in conjunction with negative occurrences and conditions. It is only when you reach the epilogue that Brands, in a grudging CYA passage, acknowledges the extraordinary improvement in the standard of living enjoyed by virtually all Americans in the last third of the 19th century thanks to capitalism. But alas, Brands reverts to form in the last few lines with a cliched allusion to Calvin Coolidge and the breezy unsupported charge that the Great Depression was the product of capitalism.
This could have been a fine book had the author’s ideological blinders not marred it so badly.
Compelling narrative marred by ideological bias
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
The reviewer who argued that Professor Brands doesn't understand economics might make a correct point technically, but is denying the fundamental truth in the narrative. Democracy is the rule of the people, one vote for each person. In a prominently capitalist economy, the owners of industry hold far more power than one vote could get them. Brands Illustrates how this period, more than any before it in America, saw that balance of power swing strongly in favor of the prominant capitalists of the day. Brands does not take sides in this struggle, however. He merely shows how this shaped the America we live in today.
I think he tends to treat American presidents kindly, and this seems to be the case in his treatment of Grover Cleveland. His biography of Andrew Jackson also played things fairly safe.
Overall, a very enjoyable read and an excellent addition to an American history buff's collection.
Very good, not quite great.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.