
The Demon in Democracy
Totalitarian Temptations in Free Societies
Failed to add items
Add to Cart failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed

Get 2 free audiobooks during trial.
Buy for $14.61
-
Narrated by:
-
Liam Gerrard
Ryszard Legutko lived and suffered under communism for decades - and he fought with the Polish anti-communist movement to abolish it. Having lived for two decades under a liberal democracy, however, he has discovered that these two political systems have a lot more in common than one might think. They both stem from the same historical roots in early modernity, and accept similar presuppositions about history, society, religion, politics, culture, and human nature.
In The Demon in Democracy, Legutko explores the shared objectives between these two political systems, and explains how liberal democracy has, over time, lurched towards the same goals as communism, albeit without Soviet-style brutality.
Both systems, says Legutko, reduce human nature to that of the common man, who is led to believe himself liberated from the obligations of the past. Both the communist man and the liberal democratic man refuse to admit that there exists anything of value outside the political systems to which they pledged their loyalty. And both systems refuse to undertake any critical examination of their ideological prejudices.
©2016 Ryszard Legutko (P)2017 TantorListeners also enjoyed...




















People who viewed this also viewed...













Excellent, but bleak, political philosophy
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Slow to start but riveting by the end
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Fantastic book
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
I've written over 2300 reviews of Audible books and have refrained from negative comments about another review. However, the very negative review of this book by Tom S of London literally begs for a response. The review reeks of personal animosity toward the author. My advice to potential listeners of this book is to give the review the credit it deserves and ignore it completely.
Important book on political philosophy
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
I thought I'd finish it to see someone else's point but what a waste of time and money.
often his arguments start in a way that look like he has a point but leaves a lingering suspicion. Shortly thereafter, the argument's absurdity is displayed by cherry picked instances at best and outright distortions more usually.
Of course to him, who claims liberal democracy is a homogeneous block opposed to him, it is a quasi dictatorship.
Of course, to him, an academic, all other academics are blind and mindless.
When there is one fool in the room and you see many...
Regarding actual problems of democracy, his complaints would not fill a half page.
He is deeply anti European, claiming there can be no European society, willfully ignoring that not too long ago there was no German or Italian people, that the sense of community came with time and that today an Italian certainly thinks there is an Italian society.
if you are a right wing nutjob on the Alex Jones spectrum, maybe this is your echo chamber, that is if you believe that religious freedom and equality only counts for Christians and that according other religious groups the same right is discriminatory to your privileges then this is your guy. This guy also pretends that women and gays are privileged groups. Removing bigoted discrimination apparently makes those groups privileged rather than treated equal. So if you are a heterosexual man full of complexes that giving the 'weaker sex' the same position as men, worried about a war on you, you might find support here. Just don't try to explain away how the 'strong sex' has anything to fear from being given an equal starting point with the weak.
Oh yeah, if you like beating your wife, this is also for you. The author is outraged at the idea that a government intervene in matters of domestic violence. of course, written with plausible deniability.
I pity this man so thoroughly stuck in the far past by a profound fear of reality and the democracy that shapes it. A reality in which Christianity is less of a priority than in the dark ages. A reality in which he is a sore loser of a democratic process.
Sore loser
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.