It was the universe's most elusive particle, the lynchpin for everything scientists dreamed up to explain how physics works. It had to be found. But projects as big as CERN's Large Hadron Collider don't happen without incredible risks - and occasional skullduggery.
In the definitive account of this landmark event, Sean Carroll reveals the insights, rivalry, and wonder that fuelled the Higgs discovery, and takes us on a riveting and irresistible ride to the very edge of physics today.
©2012 Sean Carroll (P)2013 Recorded Books LLC
"Excellent...This book is so hard to put down. That's testament to Carroll, a practising scientist, also being a gifted writer" (New Scientist)
"Vivid...Carroll is particularly skilled at tackling the complexities of particle physics in a readable yet reasonably uncompromising" (Financial Times)
Higgs boson explained
This is a factual book this is a silly question.
OK but at times he sounded like he had been reading too long and was tired.
Physics enlightens me, does not move me, silly question.
Overall it is an excellent listen if you are interested in the story behind the discovery of the Higgs boson. It requires a modicum of understanding of particle physics but most people who are attracted by this subject will be able to understand it.
Firstly the narration in my opinion is awful and makes the book painful to listen to. Also very full of annoying Americanisms.
The book doesn't 'end' as such, it just peters out feebly.
He makes the book hard to listen to with drawl of his voice and monotony of his timbre.
I was really looking forward to listening to this book but was left wishing I hadn't bothered.
"you had one job, carroll..."
I doubt it. Although I can't fault Hogan for a workmanlike job of narration, the flaw lies with Carroll, who manages to take one of the most exciting breakthroughs in modern physics, the biggest, most complex experiment ever conducted, plus the exploration of the deepest most fundamental nature of the universe and cock it up. True, it's a difficult, esoteric subject, but he's supposed to be a science communicator, and the audience for this kind of book (I would imagine) wouldn't come to it without a small measure of knowledge about the subject. A confused, muddled book, too full of vignettes about quirky scientists and personal imposition.
I'm not sure how he managed it, but, he made the whole fascinating tale boring hard work.
I would compare it unfavourably to anything by Richard Dawkins, such as The Blind Watchmaker or Unweaving The Rainbow, or Bad Science by Ben Goldacre, but only to show that these books are how it should be done.
Sure, the narration is fine, lively and engaging. Plenty of variation of pace and pitch and all the things that stop a voice being tedious to listen to.
Read a better book on the subject.
You had one job, Carroll.
Report Inappropriate Content