But for the terrified men and women chance had saved, it was also the dawn of a new struggle for survival - a struggle more dangerous and challenging than any they had ever known....
©1985 Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle; (P)2009 Audible, Inc.
"Take your earthquakes, waterlogged condominiums, swarms of bugs, colliding airplanes, and flaming what-nots, wrap them up and they wouldn't match one page of Lucifer's Hammer for sweaty-palmed suspense." (Chicago Daily News)
"Massively entertaining." (Cleveland Plain-Dealer)
The survivors come up with some similar solutions to having to do without technology. A bit plodding in some places but those were few and far between. A really engaging listen. I found myself wondering, "what about EMP"?
I like a lot of classic science fiction, and this one just doesn't hold a candle to so many others in the genre - I was disappointed given the acclaim of the authors in the genre and how often I'd read about this book as one of the classics of post-apocalyptic fiction. Nope. A good classic will stand the test of time, not become a cliche in style and substance, yet this is both. I like post-apocalyptic fiction and I've listened to several (including the excellent Alas Babylon and Day of the Triffids), but this one was worthy only to sate my curiosity, not for the book itself.
It's loaded with science but little emotion, and the expository writing in the third person makes it seem like an encyclopedia entry (a very loooonnnng encyclopedia entry) rather than a story about real people. The characterizations are cliches and dated, the language is cliched and dated, and the narration is rather wooden and clipped, furthering the emotionless feeling of the audiobook. Given that it's over 24 hours long, it's not a road I'd suggest anyone start down unless you know you're already a fan of this author. Not bad enough for me to ask for a refund (I didn't hate it), but I won't recommend it, either.
There was a time when Larry Niven was one of my favorite authors. Of course, that time was when I was an immature SF geek who didn't read much else. Okay, I still think "Ringworld" was kind of awesome. And I have fond memories of some of his other collaborations with Jerry Pournelle, e.g. "Footfall" and "Oath of Fealty." But the last few I have read really unearthed things I didn't notice when I was younger, and this one, which was one of their early collaboration, really shows its age.
"Lucifer's Hammer" is fine plot-wise. In fact, I'd say Niven and Pournelle always do very well with the plots and the hard SF. This is an end-of-the-world post-apocalypse adventure, and I love those like candy. So I enjoyed it despite groaning every now and then at the authors', ah... issues.
Written in 1977, "Lucifer's Hammer" is your basic "comet strike devastates Planet Earth" scenario. The Hamner-Brown comet is spotted months away by a wealthy amateur astronomer, and as it approaches, excitement turns to apprehension as scientists keep revising the estimate of the odds of the comet striking Earth from "billions to one" to "millions to one" to "thousands to one," and... you get the idea. It is not exactly a spoiler to say that the comet does, in fact, strike the Earth — in fact, it fragments into pieces which land in massive strikes all over the globe. Pretty much every coastal area is wiped out, there are massive weather changes, tectonic shifts bring volcanoes to life, so yeah, pretty much the end of global civilization, as least for a few generations. It doesn't help that as soon as the strikes begin, the USSR and China launch nukes at each other. Thanks in large part to a joint US-Soviet space mission, with astronauts and cosmonauts watching the entire Armageddon playing out from orbit, they are able to prevent the US from launching and being targeted in return.
The remainder of the story takes place in California, where survivors in the San Joaquin valley go about preparing for the coming ice age and trying to rebuild what little civilization they can. Needless to say, this is complicated by both internal tensions and external threats from an army of anti-technology fanatics who practice ritual cannibalism, led by a mad doomsday preacher.
It's very exciting stuff, and also fairly realistic in how it approaches both the social and technological challenges of survival in a post-armageddon scenario.
So why only three stars? Well, for starters, there is Niven and Pournelle's usual problem with women. It was even worse in "The Mote in God's Eye," and I was (pleasantly) surprised that there was not a lot of gratuitous rape to spice up the fall of civilization, but the female characters all pretty much go into instant "Attach myself to the nearest alpha-male" mode, and one of the characters is even referred to (ironically, and with awareness of her role, which she does not particularly like) as the "Princess" because her Senator father is the current leader of the survivors, and whoever marries her will ensure the stability and succession of the dynasty. So there was a little bit of awareness there, and yeah, it was written in 1977, but still, one gets the distinct impression that when the Senator's aide reflects smugly to himself that one of the few good things about Hammerfall was that it put an end to "Women's lib," he's kind of speaking for the authors.
Oh, then there's the part about that cannibal army forming around a group of Black Nationalists who were going on a crime spree when the Hammer fell. The New Brotherhood Army eventually becomes a multi-racial, ostensibly egalitarian organization ("egalitarian" in the sense that anyone regardless of race who steps out of line gets killed and eaten), but the leaders are the Black Nationalists and a black former Army sergeant. Until a white preacher comes and gives them a cause - namely, fighting technology. So, let's recap: when the Hammer falls and ends civilization, white farmers, politicians, and engineers start rebuilding a stable community, while black people turn into rampaging cannibals taking orders from a white guy. Umm, did nobody see any Unfortunate Implications in this even in 1977? I suppose Niven and Pournelle's defense would be that not all of the New Brotherhood Army is black, and there is a black astronaut who's one of the good guys, and a few black farmers in the Stronghold are mentioned. Well, okay then.
There's also an awful lot of "neener-neener, how do you granola-crunching hippies like your 'natural living' now?" as the survivors of a former commune realize that gosh, they really did like having electricity and plumbing. Niven and Pournelle do this a lot, as in "Fallen Angels," where they spend the entire book poking at environmentalists and anti-space and anti-nuclear activists. In "Lucifer's Hammer," the only surviving nuclear power plant becomes potentially the salvation of civilization.
White people, nuclear power, and the space program = good.
Black people, religion, and women's lib: Bad.
I am being a little snarky here. The authors weren't quite as horribly axe-grinding as, say, certain authors of political thrillers or grimdark fantasy. But still, this is a book that you will enjoy if you like the premise and don't pay much attention to subtext, but will probably annoy you if you do notice things like ALL THE BLACK PEOPLE BECOME CANNIBALS!
Entertaining, suspenseful, a very good post-apocalyptic thriller for hard SF fans, and also slightly sexist and really (if unintentionally) racist.
I never lost interest in the book. Some thought that the book started slow but I didn't. It kept me interested from start to finish. The start of the book was informative and set the stage for a very exiting finish.
This audiobook, written in 1977, is timeless. The characters and events which take place, could easily take place today. Well worth the listen.
You've seen it before -- except this was where you saw it 'before.' An old-fashioned meteor-strikes-Earth novel that I had somehow missed but that is somehow not "dated," although it is decades old (Yes, it is "dated" in terms of the technology, of course...but that would make any novel not set in the present time "dated."). The characters' reactions to total disaster are spot on and timeless. The writing is well done...I was engrossed. Could absolutely not stop listening.
I was intrigued by the title and found out that it was a clever play on a central character's name. I really enjoyed this audiobook and would highly recommend it. Check it out and you will see!!!!!
Niven and Pournelle combine to make a well developed, plausible outcome to a devastating direct strike by a comet. The character development is not overly drawn out and the story moves along well.
The beginning was very boring to me. I kept at it knowing that it had to get better after the comet hit. It did, but then, it ended way too quickly and some of the events were glossed over. Still, not a bad listen, could have been better...
Good read, dated material, but still a great story. There's plenty of character development and the story moves nicely. A cannibal army always makes for some fun times!
"A book of three parts - boring, ok and good"
The first third of this book is pretty boring. Once things start to happen then the next third starts to become interesting as they realise what's going to happen and deal with the initial impact.
It's the final third which gets good.
Totally lost interest in the characters and plot.
I would try a sample first next time
He could only perform to the best of his ability with the content he was given.
Returned this book before i came to the end as i just could not have cared less what happens at the end.
This is the ultimate 'end of the world as we know it' novel. A great story.
"Was totall engrossed"
Epic, memorable, brilliant
The length - I love a long story and this is a real epic.
I agree with other reviews though - the lead up to the event doesn't need to be as long. Also some battles were missed out, I would've liked to have experienced those.
Accents. Very good accents.
Loved it. Just wish it had gone on longer. Have read a few in this genre and it's up there with Earth Abides as my favourite but this has more action. Earth Abides being more philosophical
"Dated and slow"
The advantage of a lot of sci-fi and fantasy is that, as it is set outside of it's own time, it usually dates well. This book however feels very much like a product of the early seventies and this is really apparent in the attitudes of the characters and the roles that women play. The pace is slow and the characters are not particularly interesting. After five hours of listening I decided that I didn't care if any of these people got squished by a comet and hit delete.
Arguably the best apocalyptic novel ever written. Set in the 70s but that only really affected a couple of scenes.
"Much better than those that came after"
It seems a storyline that was killed by Hollywood with some pretty poor movies. But this book is much more entertaining than those well known dodgy movies with similar storylines, I thoroughly enjoyed the whole thing. It has been emulated many times since published in one way or another, but in the disaster survival setting this book follows, it is a very good entertaining story. - Was interested to see that Arthur C Clarke published a book 20 years later called "Gods Hammer" about a comet strike on earth - wonder if they are similar in other ways - would like to get that on Audible... Recommend if you like "end of civilisation" stories with bad guys and heroes.
"Predictable Disaster Story"
A comet hits the earth and affects a diverse bunch of Californians. It all seemed a bit dated to me. It also seemed forever for the story to get going with the first part of the book really dragging. There's a whole chapter on mail getting delivered! Apart from that, if you like disaster stories, you may enjoy listening to a Californian apocalypse. I just didn't enjoy it that much.
Very disappointed the story wonders all over the place the reader is American and just doesn't do it.
This book was just brilliant - the stark realities of our fragile society............
Report Inappropriate Content