Professor Cary explores thousands of years of deep reflection and brilliant debate over the nature of God, the human self, and the world in these 32 lectures. It's a debate that serves as a vivid introduction to the rich and complex history shared by the West's central religious and philosophical traditions.
Whether you're a believer, a seeker, or both, you'll find much to spark your deepest ponderings in these talks on the long and rich interplay between faith and reason. You'll join Professor Cary on the fascinating search for answers about the similar questions philosophy and faith ask: What is the ultimate reality? What can we know, or what should we believe about it? To learn how these crucial issues have been discussed over the past three millennia is to enter the core of our intellectual heritage - to find the origin of some of our deepest perplexities and most cherished aspirations. It is a comprehensive journey - intellectually, philosophically, and spiritually - but one which requires no special background. By the end of these lectures, you'll gain a new or sharpened fluency in issues that include the historical interaction between philosophical traditions (such as Platonism) and religious traditions (such as Judaism and Christianity); the synthesis of philosophy and religion that characterized the "classical theism" of the medieval period; the most prominent philosophical criticisms of religion; and the reasons why many religious thinkers of the 20th century are suspicious of the alliances between philosophy and religion.
PLEASE NOTE: When you purchase this title, the accompanying reference material will be available in your Library section along with the audio.
©1999 The Teaching Company, LLC (P)1999 The Great Courses
Your Brother in Christ
Years ago I had the privilege of listening to Prof. Cary speak on Luther and Calvin in regards to the sacraments and salvation. I've been a fan of his ever since. These lectures will make a fan of you also. As a Lutheran pastor I have given a lot of time to the study of both philosophy and religion. I've read Copleston and T.W. Jones on the history of philosophy, as well as diving into original sources. I have spent a good deal of time reading about other religions as well. Yet, I have found few who are able to deliver the content Cary does as clearly and concisely as he does. I mean his study and personal grasp of the subject matter is evident in every lesson, and point. Seriously, if you teach philosophy or religion in any capacity you do yourself a favor to give this lecture series a listen. If you are interested in this subject you will find nothing better that I know of.
This series will better help any listener understand why they personally think the way they do, it will also challenge them to understand why others think the way they think. This will be true of Christians, atheists, Jews and Muslims. Cary, a man of strong convictions himself, is refreshingly respectful of all the positions he covers, whether or not he agrees with them. He is also forthcoming with his own biases.
Cary does buy into "The New Perspective on Paul" as introduced by Sanders and made popular with N.T. Wright. I myself think that this position is a bit flawed. He discuses this position in relation to the Christian concept of legalism and Augustine. Yet, despite this disagreement I find myself compelled to take Cary's advice at the beginning of the lecture series and listen to this one again. I did find his presentation of this position to be the clearest one I've come across. And I'm sure listening to the series as second time will be even more rewarding than it was the first time through. I am also looking forward to listening to his other lecture series.
Cary has a particular gift of exposing how theology and philosophy have impacted each other over the years, and how these developments have changed Islam, Judaism and Christianity over the years, and in turn how these religions have also had impact on philosophy.
I am assuming the listener has a pretty good attention span and pretty good patience with walking through a lot of moderately abstract words and ideas. The person who would not like this is one who would quickly start rolling eyes and glazing over at any description of the details of religious doctrine. I love this lecture set. From days of sitting in Episcopal church as a little boy, I have always scratched my head at its odd (to my boy self) utterances, such as the Nicene Creed. Hey WHAT?! As a little boy with a hunger for vocabulary, I had a hunger to grab those words and phrases and follow them like strings back to whoever and wherever they came from. What does that MEAN? What did those people THINK? How did my "ordinary" neighbors and family members come to reel off all this jargon with apparently little deep understanding of it? How could they say they base their lives on that? As with political matters (where I read just today some impassioned, blustery comment on the Constitution's 14th Amendment, of which the writer was clearly utterly clueless), I have had the same feeling with almost all religious remarks and assertions I hear. How could people seem so ignorant and yet be hurling this stuff at each other and fighting about it? In other words, I am a scholar by temperament. I HAVE to dig into this stuff. And here, I am mightily rewarded. I am swimming in this stuff. And the presentation is ideal. This is as listenable as I could imagine this topic being. As I strive to do as a professor, this professor uses the most clear, plain examples possible to open our minds' eyes to some pretty fancy ideas. This is first-rate. Not only Plato and Aristotle, but inquiring minds might want to know, who was Plotinus? Philo of Alexandria? Maimonedes? Augustine? On and on.
Overall: The early discussion of the interplay of religion and philosophy was fascinating but the latter lectures were difficult to grasp or resulted in minimal revelation; The overall focus seemed too restrictive on the orthodox Judeo-Christian God vs. other views of God
• Discussion on the love-hate relationship between western philosophy and Christianity/Judaism: Examples of how philosophy challenges aspects of orthodox Christianity/Judaism but also how it is used to provide explanations; Examples are also provided of how Christianity borrowed ideas from Plato and other Platonist philosophers to help form its orthodoxy
• Philosophical thought on the nature of reality/meaning of life outside of the context of orthodox Christianity/Judaism was lightly covered (Islamic God, other views of God, etc.)
• Some of the lectures were hard to grasp (the latter ones) and when those philosopher’s main points were understood the insight appeared minimal and did not leave me more reflective
Didn't read the book. Good lecture series.
How it peaked my interest in Plato.
He white washes over many contradictions in Christianity, never really addressing clear, well noted flaws in the Bible. Though he does state his bias in the first and last chaper.
Report Inappropriate Content