The greatest obstacle to sound economic policy is not entrenched special interests or rampant lobbying, but the popular misconceptions, irrational beliefs, and personal biases held by ordinary voters. This is economist Bryan Caplan's sobering assessment in this provocative and eye-opening book.
Caplan argues that voters continually elect politicians who either share their biases or else pretend to, resulting in bad policies winning again and again by popular demand. Boldly calling into question our most basic assumptions about American politics, Caplan contends that democracy fails precisely because it does what voters want. Through an analysis of Americans' voting behavior and opinions on a range of economic issues, he makes the convincing case that noneconomists suffer from four prevailing biases: they underestimate the wisdom of the market mechanism, distrust foreigners, undervalue the benefits of conserving labor, and pessimistically believe the economy is going from bad to worse. Caplan lays out several bold ways to make democratic government work better - for example, urging economic educators to focus on correcting popular misconceptions and reccomending that democracies do less and let markets take up the slack.
The Myth of the Rational Voter takes an unflinching look at how people who vote under the influence of false beliefs ultimately end up with government that delivers lousy results. With the upcoming presidential election season drawing nearer, this thought-provoking book is sure to spark a long-overdue reappraisal of our elective system.
This book is published by Princeton University Press.
©2007 Princeton University Press (P)2010 Redwood Audiobooks
"The best political book this year." (The New York Times)
"Caplan thinks that democracy as it is now practiced cannot be salvaged, and his position is based on a simple observation: 'Democracy is a commons, not a market.'" (The New Yorker)
Good book by an author who's willing to depart from conventional wisdom. While democracy is spoken of virtually everywhere else as the only possible governance model for an enlightened nation, Mr. Caplan makes a good argument that democracy as we know it has some very serious flaws.
If you like books by economists, as I do, then you'll like this one. He starts by asking a question that most people would never dare ask, then he logically pursues an answer by examining the incentives created for voters and politicians under a democratic system, how people respond to them and where that leads.
Narrator does a fine job, in my opinion.
this book put you in a place with the prove of the big failure of democracy. it just dose not work . and if u are wandering how big country pass it legislation and have kinda stable system ? guess what , it because political just buy u words and dont actually do it (lips serves ),of course there is more details about that in the book . anyway the book is lighting . however the author is very materialistic and i hate that so much it just annoyed me i cant believe a man can be that materialise
Overall the content of the book was interesting and the author does a good job of making his argument. The book is somewhat hindered by being in audio format.
* Even with the headers between sections, it can be hard to tell where they are. It would help it the reader had paused briefly for them.
* The author likes to do lots of block quotes surrounded by prose. Given he is typically quoting contemporary writers, it can be hard to tell when the quote starts. This is a problem audible has in general.
With those complaints in mind, the book is still quite interesting and thought provoking. I still recommend listening to it.
This book was way longer than it needed to be to prove its point. I feel like 50 pages might have been more appropriate.
The voice wasn't interesting or engaging. It was great to listen to while trying to fall asleep; you could fall asleep in 5 minutes. However it was really bad at keeping your attention (though that might have just been the overly repetitive nature of the book, but I feel like it's a combination of the two).
If it were an hour long documentary, I think it would be valuable.
The concept of the book is excellent and one that I approached with much interest, being the Anarcho-Capitalist/Libertarian that I am. The book outlines the case for why decisions made in the free market are always more rational, sustainable, and mutually beneficial than ideas made in the electoral process. Unfortunately, it's a bit difficult to follow when you're listening to it as the author throws out a lot of statistics and gets sidetracked easily. It would probably be best read in paperback format.
Very dry and shallow, and made it all the more difficult to listen to this book as opposed to reading it.
Highly reccomend it as a read if you have spare time, but not worth the audio version unless you have a really good attention span.
"Rational acknowledgment of prevailing irrationalit"
essential reading for anyone interested in the flaws of the Democratic process and how it affects economic policies.
Very efficiently debunks accepted common sense wisdom.
Report Inappropriate Content