We are currently making improvements to the Audible site. In an effort to enhance the accessibility experience for our customers, we have created a page to more easily navigate the new experience, available at the web address www.audible.com/access .
Innocent Audiobook

Innocent

Regular Price:$31.93
  • Membership Details:
    • First book free with 30-day trial
    • $14.95/month thereafter for your choice of 1 new book each month
    • Cancel easily anytime
    • Exchange books you don't like
    • All selected books are yours to keep, even if you cancel
  • - or -

Publisher's Summary

The sequel to the genre-defining, landmark best seller Presumed Innocent, Innocent continues the story of Rusty Sabich and Tommy Molto who are, once again, 20 years later, pitted against each other in a riveting psychological match after the mysterious death of Rusty's wife.

Rusty is the prime suspect. Reunited with his charismatic lawyer Sandy Stern, he will do anything to convince his beloved son, Nat, of his innocence. But what is he hiding?

In an explosive trial which will expose lies, jealousy, revenge, corruption, and the darker side of human nature, Rusty Sabich and Tommy Molto will battle it out to finally discover the real meaning of truth, and of justice.

©2010 Scott Turow (P)2010 Hachette

What the Critics Say

"Mesmerizing prose and intricate plotting lift Turow's superlative legal thriller, his best novel since his bestselling debut, Presumed Innocent....Once again, Turow displays an uncanny ability for making the passions and contradictions of his main characters accessible and understandable." (Publishers Weekly)

What Members Say

Average Customer Rating

4.0 (1741 )
5 star
 (597)
4 star
 (713)
3 star
 (310)
2 star
 (85)
1 star
 (36)
Overall
4.2 (702 )
5 star
 (301)
4 star
 (256)
3 star
 (110)
2 star
 (27)
1 star
 (8)
Story
4.3 (704 )
5 star
 (346)
4 star
 (259)
3 star
 (75)
2 star
 (15)
1 star
 (9)
Performance
Sort by:
  •  
    R. Pontiflet Fairfield, CA USA 02-24-14
    R. Pontiflet Fairfield, CA USA 02-24-14 Member Since 2015

    retired writer

    HELPFUL VOTES
    1162
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    238
    196
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    174
    11
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "A Great Sequel"

    The sequel is not as suspenseful but agreat ending as to what happened to some of the Presumed Innocent characters. I enjoyed it.

    2 of 2 people found this review helpful
  •  
    PETER WADE CINCINNATI, OH United States 07-23-10
    PETER WADE CINCINNATI, OH United States 07-23-10 Member Since 2016
    HELPFUL VOTES
    68
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    457
    33
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    4
    0
    Overall
    "WELL WRITTEN AND ENTERTAINING"

    What a nicely-crafted book. I found myself marveling at how well-written and researched it was. A really good, enthralling read.

    2 of 2 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Scott Roseville, CA, United States 07-16-10
    Scott Roseville, CA, United States 07-16-10

    Don't you just love a great story well told?

    HELPFUL VOTES
    758
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    361
    108
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    42
    0
    Overall
    "A True "Sequel" "

    Don't expect ENTIRELY different characters or plot line. I strongly recommend the original book FIRST.

    "Innocent" DID keep ME wondering, until the very end "who-done-it." (I'm a terrible detective.)

    As for courtroom drama: 1) At least a HALF of the the book is PURE courtroom or the "behind the scenes".
    2) Turrow WAS a high ranking attorney thus his keen observations of courtroom behavior ring true and are *precisely* what we courtroom drama lovers crave.

    The gripe: "Too much 'side story'" begs the question, doesn't a novel NEED developed characters? (Esp. other possible murderers?)

    My ONE beef (I RARELY complain about narrators) is that while EVERYONE ELSE sounds fine and identifiable, there is NO change in tone one BIT (that I can hear) for "the son" which leads to confusion with the father (if not listening closely for journal type headings.) I think the director expected a SON should SOUND just like his dad (ALL voices are very distinct, I've never heard a kid sound JUST like his older father.) So just THAT narration was poorly directed. Still, you get over it (Just listen for the journal type notes on who is talking now).

    The editing (no mouth sounds) is great.

    While a 2nd female narrator is advertised, she gets minimal speaking time compared to the male voice.
    Many nasty posts likely by other book companies hoping to cause, uh... "reasonable doubt", which is why they come out quickly after the book is released and are brief as they have other books to slam at work). THEY seldom explain WHAT was SO bad! Others just dislike a book but they tend say WHY. No accounting for taste.. "Esp. bad taste" - a cute rejoinder as it can cut BOTH ways.)

    Rely on the STARS given (since most don't WRITE reviews) AND then the more thorough reviews.

    5 of 6 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Richard Delman San Francisco 01-01-15
    Richard Delman San Francisco 01-01-15 Member Since 2016

    I am a 65-year-old psychologist, married for 25 years, with two sons who are 25 and 22. I love reviewing the books and the feedback I get.

    HELPFUL VOTES
    3479
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    521
    247
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    1132
    2
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Turow sells a lotta books."
    Is there anything you would change about this book?

    Its length! Can I say that again? Are you really in the mood for six solid hours of courtroom drama? I had a hard time with it. Certainly Mr. Turow and his editors don't care a fig about how I feel here, but something tells me that I have some company here. Ir's just too damn long! The plot is very clever, the writing is smooth and masterful, the narrator does a fine job, but even given all these, they lost me somewhere in the third hour of courtroom back and forth. And, I am interested in the law to begin with. I am a psychologist who has worked (some of my time) with lawyers and judges, and the issues addressed there still interest me. However, I have made my point. As I have said previously, brevity is the soul of wit.


    Would you be willing to try another book from Scott Turow? Why or why not?

    Probably not. I can't see him cutting down the length of his books, as this is the standard length of a novel now. Nonetheless, someone some day (I have a niece in the publishing business; I'll call her) will take a risk and fiddle with this tradition. Mr. Turow does not seem like a fiddler. The world of law is the highest upholder of conventionalism in our society.


    Did Edward Hermann and Orlagh Cassidy do a good job differentiating all the characters? How?

    They did. I have no complaints about either of them. Mr. Hermann is a well-known actor, and his stage presence, so to speak, is considerable. I have not heard of Ms. Cassidy before, but she, too has a very pleasant voice, very easy to listen to.


    Was Innocent worth the listening time?

    I have to say no here. Over twelve hours, most of it spent in a dusty courtroom...Even though the plot is really extremely clever, a bit soap-opera-ish, but still you do want to find out if the judge really did murder his wife. And also who offed Carolyn Polhemus twenty years ago. It's just the mind-numbing details, and the trivia of what gets dissected to no end in a trial (I do know whereof I speak; testifying in a trial makes it clear to you that trials are BORING). It is well-nigh impossible to keep up the suspense over such a long time. I will admit that The Testament, Polar Star, and The Ice Limit are all books that kept me totally involved through the ends, but those three are true masterworks. You just don't find many of those. I will keep looking.


    Any additional comments?

    I think I saw another review in which the reviewer said that the Mom did the killing, although I am sure he/she meant the first killing, of Carolyn Polhemus, out of sheer enraged jealousy. She surely didn't kill herself. Or did she?????

    7 of 9 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Charles Atkinson Greensboro, NC, United States 12-01-10
    Charles Atkinson Greensboro, NC, United States 12-01-10 Member Since 2015

    Dept Q, Harry Hole... where are you?

    HELPFUL VOTES
    5291
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    730
    453
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    1682
    11
    Overall
    "4.5 Stars for a Great Sequel"

    Presumed Innocent remains the best mystery I've ever read. I never figured out who the killer was until the last pages, and when I did, it all made sense. This book is not as spellbinding , but it works. And once again, you don't understand what really happened until the end. Its weakness for me was the severely flawed characters. I did not care for this Rusty Savage, though Molto was a pleasant surprise.

    4 of 5 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Big jim Picotto Great White North 02-06-15
    Big jim Picotto Great White North 02-06-15 Member Since 2016

    Say something about yourself!

    HELPFUL VOTES
    492
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    99
    54
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    26
    5
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Good. Not Great."

    Struggled to find the son likeable/believable. Bit of a dunce in fact. Will be interesting to see if Turow continues with a Rusty Sabich follow up.

    1 of 1 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Kathleen 11-09-14
    Kathleen 11-09-14 Member Since 2015
    HELPFUL VOTES
    115
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    104
    20
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    1
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Phenelzine + cheese & pickled herring ='s murder?"

    I am half way through this book and am really enjoying it. At times I even get a " Gone Girl" vibe even though the stories are very dissimilar. My problem with the book (and the reason I am not giving it 5 stars) is the cause of death. At the risk of giving out a minor spoiler - the possible cause of death was murder caused by giving an MAO inhibitor along with certain foods that can cause a hypertensive crisis. In the book this medication had apparently been prescribed as a PRN to augment her other treatment. Now to the problem - MAO Inhibitors are not prescribed as PRNS for several reasons: like other antidepressants they do not work immediately, you need to be on them for a period of time to notice their effect, also, they can interact with other psych meds and would be dangerous if given with other types of antidepressants and we can assume someone who is bipolar and on numerous meds would be taking some sort of med for depression. I was a psych nurse for many years and long ago the use of this drug was fairly common. Patients were informed to avoid certain foods but compliance being what it is, I am sure plenty of beer and pizza was consumed despite the warnings, yet, never have I heard af any problems occurring because of eating "forbidden" foods which leads me to believe the risk may not be that great.
    "Presumed Innocent" is one of my all time favorite books and I'm guessing "Innocent" is going to follow a similar storyline which is fine with me. I just wish I didn't have to believe a psychiatrist would have prescribed a patient 10 tablets of Phenelzine.

    1 of 1 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Thomas RICHMOND, CA, United States 10-19-13
    Thomas RICHMOND, CA, United States 10-19-13 Member Since 2011
    HELPFUL VOTES
    44
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    22
    15
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    5
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "I had never read Turow and now I know why..."

    Yes, Turow has an eye for detail but only the most boring, superficial minutia. Page after page where nothing happens, no plot is advanced, story-lines repeat. And Hermann is a monotoned snooze. Perhaps Hermann should lay off the beta blockers before he reads.
    Don't bother, even if you always wondered about Turow, and you read the glowing reviews you will come away feeling cheated. There is nothing of depth to say as there is no depth to be found in this listen.

    1 of 1 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Cheryl Douglasville, GA, United States 06-07-13
    Cheryl Douglasville, GA, United States 06-07-13 Member Since 2014
    HELPFUL VOTES
    129
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    205
    198
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    9
    8
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "So, did he kill his wife?"

    This is a sequel to “Presumed Innocent” of which I thoroughly enjoyed listening to on audible. I looked forward to reading the second book, “Innocent”, and I was not disappointed. It was a great courtroom legal thriller focusing on the trial and the views of the different characters. Good characterization too.

    If you are a reader that enjoys legal thrillers, I highly recommend this story. It is great storytelling, plus the narrators, Edward Hermann and Orlagh Cassidy, did an excellent job!

    Be sure to read the first book in the series if at all possible.

    1 of 1 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Suzanne 10-22-10
    Suzanne 10-22-10 Member Since 2016

    * love to work (nursing informatics) * love dogs * love speed * listen to books constantly *

    HELPFUL VOTES
    69
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    256
    28
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    1
    0
    Overall
    "Loved It!"

    Could not put it down - very entertaining, satisfying, and always a surprising turn. Not just a story, but a crafted tale.

    1 of 1 people found this review helpful

Report Inappropriate Content

If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.

Cancel

Thank you.

Your report has been received. It will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.