Houston homicide detective Roland March was once one of the best. Now he's disillusioned, cynical, and on his way out. His superiors farm him out on a variety of punishment details until an unexpected break gives March one last chance to save his career. And his humanity. All he has to do? Find the missing teenage daughter of a Houston evangelist that every cop in town is already looking for. But March has an inside track: a multiple murder nobody else thinks is connected. Battling a new partner, an old nemesis, and the demons of his past, getting to the truth could cost March everything. Even his life.
©2012 J. Mark Bertrand (P)2012 Brilliance Audio, Inc.
This central murder mystery of this book is unexpectedly complex. We follow the plot down one logic path, just to have one or two suddenly spring up. But it all connects well, making sense in the overall story. I did feel the resolution was kind of rushed, because,all of a sudden, the murder is resolved. Then the author launches into lessons about how to be a good christian like suppressing ambition, turning away from revenge, forgiving the worst violations against you, and going to church to get over life's worst tragedies. The main character even kicks out a very personable and helpful liberally minded guy from the rental apartment they own in favor of a christian couple and all is portrayed as being better that way.
Bottom line: I REALLY enjoyed the murder mystery. But after being preached to so heavily at the close of the story, I wanted to throw my iPad across the shop I was working in.
By the way, the narration is typical Mel Foster. I like his reading style. So I enjoyed that aspect.
Book blogger at Bookwi.se
I liked the book. I am not normally a fan of Christian Fiction (I almost never read it). But several of my friends have recommended this to me and it has gotten good reviews. And I picked up the kindle version for free and used promotional credit for the audiobook. So I didn't have anything to lose.
The narrator was wrong. His accents were stereotypical and schlocky and overall detracted from the book. The book needed a darker narrator. Someone with more age and gravel in his voice. James Marsters (of Dresden Files book) would have been fine.
The narration wasn't horrible, I listened to most of the book. But I finished up the book on kindle and think that reading the book is a better choice.
The second book in the series is available on Audible, but I will read instead of listen to it.
I've read this book, and it is awesome! Imagine my surprise to find the recorded book to be one of the worst books I have ever listened to. There is no emotion, the narrator is speed reading in a monotone, and fails to even acknowledge punctuation. Even as a "free" read, this isn't worth keeping it's that bad. Opinions vary of course....so your mileage might vary.
Would have rated it 3.8 if I could. Would have given it a four but I wasn't that drawn to the main character.
One reviewer said this was a Christian book. I just thought it was part of the plot. Roland March is considered on his way out. He's been loaned out to other departments from being a murder detective. He sort of is bounced around between being a murder detective and working with the missing person's division. First he's on the team to investigate a murder at a drug house. Then he's switched to investigating the disappearance of the teenage daughter of an evangelist. He thinks the two are connected and sets about to prove it.
There were a lot of plot twists and turns and the Christian part wasn't overwhelming. It was more just part of the story. The characters were well developed and the story interesting.
There were complaints about the narrator but I didn't think he was that bad. His voice was easy to listen to.
Or maybe the fault was mine, but for whatever reason, I just couldn't get into this thing. My mind kept drifting away -- there were parts that caught my attention, I'd listen. But then it would veer off into .... .... ... I don't know what. It would lose me again. The book just drifted.
Time after time I backtracked, listened again, but I just couldn't get hooked on the story or the characters. I just now finished it -- have no real idea what it was about, even.
At one point, I was listening, the phone rang, I guess I forgot to turn the iPod off, so when I got back to the book it was still playing. This time? I didn't even backtrack -- I didn't have a clue what was going on anyway, what difference did it make?
I guess I'll steer clear of this author. (I don't know how to rate the narrator when I didn't like the book, but it doesn't seem fair to ding the narrator when it was the book itself that was the problem. Anyway, no problems with the narrator.. it was the book kept putting me to sleep...)
Don't know what I want to be when I grow up. Trip's cool though. Use Audible to make gym-training sane... And rip my imagination.
Mark Bertrand teases. He reveals Roland March slowly, using foreshadowing much like a potter might use his fingers. For a time I thought I'd missed an earlier book in this series since the plot seemed to feed upon facts not in evidence. And yet, much like a morning mist dissolves, things clarified and somewhere deep inside I muttered, "Of course".
"Back On Murder's" worth the time and I'll buy more of Roland March's adventures. Look forward to them. Oh, Mel Foster's OK, but he faced a particular challenge with the book.
There are too many characters with useful speaking parts in this story. I wish Bertrand had cut away at the supporting ensemble. Unlike a print version, it's hard to go back and recall who each character might be, hence the reader/actor has to create a uniquely differentiated ensemble. Foster does it OK, but perhaps it's not his fault that I can't say, "He done it reeeeely good." Y'know?
The book started out well but quickly lost me with the "big reveal" as to why the main character was the way he was. It might have helped if the narrator offered a bit more inflection in his voice. Since that never happened I quickly lost interest, however, it did provide white noise while I was in the dental chair for a bridge prep.
Overall the book was pretty good. It was writen in first person and the narration made me feel like I was listening to Dragnet with Joe Friday. The author did an excellent job with character development. I'm looking forward to reading book 2 in the series.
This surely was not a good book to listen to in 2015 after daily news of policemen taking advantage of their positions to destroy lives of people of color and the poor. I keep wanting to stop listening but I'm trying to make it through. I wonder if the author has had any thoughts about the story line (how wonderful and committed police officers are) and if he were writing this book today, would he give fewer accolades of those behind the blue line.
I will surely be more careful. I am really turned off.
Roland's constant accolades of the men with badges. Basically cops are good, none entered the profession to be able to carry guns, they all wanted to protect and serve, yada, yada, yada!
Report Inappropriate Content